VaR is subject to a significant positive bias
AbstractThis article shows that value-at-risk (VaR), the most popular risk measure in financial practice, has a considerable positive bias when used for a portfolio with fat-tail distribution. The bias increases with higher confidence level, heavier tails, and smaller sample size. Also, the Harrell-Davis quantile estimator and its simulation counterpart, called the bootstrap estimator, tend to have a more significant positive bias for fat-tail distributions.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Statistics & Probability Letters.
Volume (Year): 72 (2005)
Issue (Month): 4 (May)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Darryll Hendricks, 1996. "Evaluation of value-at-risk models using historical data," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, issue Apr, pages 39-69.
- Masaaki Kijima & Masamitsu Ohnishi, 1996. "Portfolio Selection Problems Via The Bivariate Characterization Of Stochastic Dominance Relations," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(3), pages 237-277.
- Eckhard Platen & Gerhard Stahl, 2003. "A Structure for General and Specific Market Risk," Research Paper Series 91, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
- repec:fip:fedhpr:y:1996:i:may:p:334-362 is not listed on IDEAS
- Jeremy Berkowitz & James O'Brien, 2002. "How Accurate Are Value-at-Risk Models at Commercial Banks?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(3), pages 1093-1111, 06.
- Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean-Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228.
- Inui, Koji & Kijima, Masaaki, 2005. "On the significance of expected shortfall as a coherent risk measure," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 853-864, April.
- Kim, Joseph H.T., 2010. "Bias correction for estimated distortion risk measure using the bootstrap," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 198-205, October.
- Denuit, Michel & Dhaene, Jan & Goovaerts, Marc & Kaas, Rob & Laeven, Roger, 2006. "Risk measurement with equivalent utility principles," Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven urn:hdl:123456789/200185, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
- Denuit, M & Dhaene, Jan & Goovaerts, Marc & Kaas, R & Laeven, R, 2005. "Risk measurement with the equivalent utility principles," Open Access publications from Katholieke Universiteit Leuven urn:hdl:123456789/122216, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wendy Shamier).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.