Concept mapping of diet and physical activity: Uncovering local stakeholders perception in the Quebec City region
AbstractOverweight and obesity are major public health concerns that are neither evenly distributed among the population nor between regions. Many studies suggest that beyond individual characteristics, the place where one lives influences lifestyle choices that underpin overweight and obesity. We observed such a situation in the province of Quebec (Canada), and because data availability from surveys was limited to a local level, the observed overweight disparities between local communities could not be entirely explained. Aiming to uncover local factors not captured by national survey data sets and in order to aid local level intervention, we investigated how the overweight problem was perceived by stakeholders through a concept mapping methodology. Concept mapping is a mixed method that relies upon stakeholders' perception as well as statistical techniques to draw a synthesis of the problem in the form of a conceptual map. A total of 45 stakeholders working in four areas with contrasting overweight prevalence in the Quebec City region were involved in the process. The map enables a global understanding of stakeholders' perception. This perception is not necessarily in line with public health knowledge however. For example, key concepts on the map suggest that physical activity is perceived to be much more important than diet with regards to population overweight and that urban design elements seem to be of low concern. Concept mapping is an innovative tool for planning and evaluation and can help stakeholders to develop adapted interventions to promote healthy lifestyle. It also provides relevant information to enhance the comprehension of local health disparities with a geographical perspective where data availability is limited.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.
Volume (Year): 72 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 (February)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statistics
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wendy Shamier).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.