IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v69y2009i4p613-622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Why doesn't she seek help for partner abuse?" An exploratory study with South Asian immigrant women

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad, Farah
  • Driver, Natasha
  • McNally, Mary Jane
  • Stewart, Donna E.

Abstract

This study explores why South Asian immigrant women with experiences of partner abuse delay seeking help from professionals. Three focus groups were conducted in Hindi language with South Asian immigrant women in Toronto. Twenty-two women participated with a mean age of 46 years (range 29-68 years). Thematic analysis was conducted on the transcribed data using constant comparison techniques within and across the groups. We found that three major themes emerged from the discussions: reasons for delayed help-seeking, turning points and talking to professionals. Women expressed delaying help-seeking to the point when "Pani sar se guzar jata he" (water crosses over your head). Their dominant reasons for delayed help-seeking were social stigma, rigid gender roles, marriage obligations, expected silence, loss of social support after migration and limited knowledge about available resources and myths about partner abuse. Women usually turned for help only after experiencing pronounced mental and physical health problems. The findings are interpreted in light of participants' immigration context and the socio-cultural norms of patriarchy, collectivism and familism. Prevention approaches to address partner abuse and delayed help-seeking among South Asian immigrant women should include tailored community education, social services to reduce vulnerability, and cultural competency of professionals. Further research and program evaluation is needed to advance the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad, Farah & Driver, Natasha & McNally, Mary Jane & Stewart, Donna E., 2009. ""Why doesn't she seek help for partner abuse?" An exploratory study with South Asian immigrant women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 613-622, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:4:p:613-622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00371-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Raj, A. & Silverman, J.G., 2003. "Immigrant South Asian women at greater risk for injury from intimate partner violence," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(3), pages 435-437.
    3. Westaby, James D., 2005. "Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 97-120, November.
    4. Hennie Boeije, 2002. "A Purposeful Approach to the Constant Comparative Method in the Analysis of Qualitative Interviews," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 391-409, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qijia Lyu & Linxiu Zhang, 2021. "Love Match, Marriage Distance, and Marriage Payment: Evidence from Rural China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Patrizia Di Giacomo & Alessandra Cavallo & AnnaMaria Bagnasco & Marina Sartini & Loredana Sasso, 2017. "Violence against women: knowledge, attitudes and beliefs of nurses and midwives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2307-2316, August.
    3. Caroline Bradbury‐Jones & Maria T Clark & Jayne Parry & Julie Taylor, 2017. "Development of a practice framework for improving nurses’ responses to intimate partner violence," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(15-16), pages 2495-2502, August.
    4. Sawrikar, Pooja & Katz, Ilan, 2017. "How aware of child sexual abuse (CSA) are ethnic minority communities? A literature review and suggestions for raising awareness in Australia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 246-260.
    5. Chantal Robillard & Janet McLaughlin & Donald C. Cole & Biljana Vasilevska & Richard Gendron, 2018. "“Caught in the Same Webs”—Service Providers’ Insights on Gender-Based and Structural Violence Among Female Temporary Foreign Workers in Canada," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 583-606, August.
    6. Caroline Bradbury‐Jones & Julie Taylor & Thilo Kroll & Fiona Duncan, 2014. "Domestic abuse awareness and recognition among primary healthcare professionals and abused women: a qualitative investigation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3057-3068, November.
    7. Sawrikar, Pooja & Katz, Ilan, 2017. "The treatment needs of victims/survivors of child sexual abuse (CSA) from ethnic minority communities: A literature review and suggestions for practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 166-179.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yadav, Rambalak & Giri, Arunangshu & Chatterjee, Satakshi, 2022. "Understanding the users' motivation and barriers in adopting healthcare apps: A mixed-method approach using behavioral reasoning theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    2. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Sanghoon Lee & Eunil Park & Sang Jib Kwon & Angel P. Del Pobil, 2015. "Antecedents of Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Telecommunication Services: Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Technology Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Elizabeth Kempen & Lorna Christie, 2022. "Designing to Attract in an Emerging Market: Applying Behavioural Reasoning Theory to South African Consumer Reactions to an Ultra-High Temperature Milk Product Line Extension," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(14), pages 4-21.
    5. Laura Petitta & Tahira M. Probst & Claudio Barbaranelli, 2017. "Safety Culture, Moral Disengagement, and Accident Underreporting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 489-504, March.
    6. Muhammad Zeeshan Zafar & Adnan Maqbool & Lucian-Ionel Cioca & Syed Ghulam Meran Shah & Shahjahan Masud, 2021. "Accentuating the Interrelation between Consumer Intention and Healthy Packaged Food Selection during COVID-19: A Case Study of Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Eccarius, Timo & Leung, Abraham & Shen, Chung-Wei & Burke, Matthew & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2021. "Prospects for shared electric velomobility: Profiling potential adopters at a multi-campus university," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    8. Lalicic, Lidija & Weismayer, Christian, 2021. "Consumers’ reasons and perceived value co-creation of using artificial intelligence-enabled travel service agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 891-901.
    9. Liang, Jyun-Kai & Eccarius, Timo & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2019. "Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 799-812.
    10. Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Hajiheydari, Nastaran, 2020. "On-demand service platforms pro/anti adoption cognition: Examining the context-specific reasons," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 180-194.
    11. Kyriakos Riskos & Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Naoum Mylonas & George Tsourvakas, 2021. "Ecolabels and the Attitude–Behavior Relationship towards Green Product Purchase: A Multiple Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Saubhagya Bhalla, 2021. "Testing the Motivations and Constraints of Collaborative Consumption: An Empirical Analysis of Disruptive Innovative Business Model," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 10(2), pages 146-157, June.
    13. Jabeen, Fauzia & Dhir, Amandeep & Islam, Nazrul & Talwar, Shalini & Papa, Armando, 2023. "Emotions and food waste behavior: Do habit and facilitating conditions matter?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    14. Bowen Qin & Ge Song, 2022. "Internal Motivations, External Contexts, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior in China—Based on the TPB-ABC Integration Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Rüdiger Hahn & Felix Ostertag & Adrian Lehr & Marion Büttgen & Sabine Benoit, 2020. "“I like it, but I don't use it”: Impact of carsharing business models on usage intentions in the sharing economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1404-1418, March.
    16. Schaubroeck, John M. & Lam, Simon S.K. & Peng, Ann C., 2016. "Can peers’ ethical and transformational leadership improve coworkers’ service quality? A latent growth analysis," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 45-58.
    17. Qian, Lixian & Yin, Juelin & Huang, Youlin & Liang, Ya, 2023. "The role of values and ethics in influencing consumers’ intention to use autonomous vehicle hailing services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. Francesc Miralles & Ferran Giones & Brian Gozun, 2017. "Does direct experience matter? Examining the consequences of current entrepreneurial behavior on entrepreneurial intention," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 881-903, September.
    19. Ying, Shiyi & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian & Song, Jinzhu, 2023. "Privacy paradox for location tracking in mobile social networking apps: The perspectives of behavioral reasoning and regulatory focus," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    20. Sarah Zafar & Saeed Badghish & Rana Muhammad Shahid Yaqub & Muhammad Zafar Yaqub, 2023. "The Agency of Consumer Value and Behavioral Reasoning Patterns in Shaping Webrooming Behaviors in Omnichannel Retail Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:4:p:613-622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.