IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v283y2021ics0277953621005426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of healthcare system reforms on public hospitals’ revenue structures: Evidence from Beijing, China

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Lu
  • Shi, Leiyu
  • Meng, Qingyue
  • Kong, Xiangrong
  • Guo, Moning
  • Lu, Feng

Abstract

To reduce the heavy reliance of public hospitals on drug sales and use of advanced technologies and to contain the escalating medical expenditures, Beijing implemented two rounds of comprehensive public hospital reform in 2017 and 2019, respectively. The first round focused on separating drug sales from hospital revenue (reform1), and the second round extended to include zero markup on medical consumables and price adjustments for medical services (reform2). To estimate how these two rounds of reform have affected public hospitals' revenue structures, we used observational data of medical revenues from 2016 to 2019 covering 354 healthcare facilities. A Panel-interrupted time-series (PITS) model was used to analyze the effects. The results suggest that the reforms have changed the structure of public hospitals' revenues. The proportion of drug sales in hospital revenues fell from 43.96% in 2016 (pre-reform) to 34.08% in 2019 (post-reform); the proportions of medical consumables decreased by 0.73% after reform 2; and the proportion of medical consultation service fees increased from 15.16% in 2016 to 24.51% in 2019. PITS analysis showed that the proportion of drug sales dropped by 5.46% in the month of reform 1, and it dropped by 0.20% per month on average after reform 2(p < 0.001). The proportion of medical consumables decreased by 0.04% per month on average after reform 2 (p < 0.001). The proportion of medical consultation service increased by 7.13% in the month of reform 1, and it increased by 0.14% per month on average after reform 2(p < 0.001). Similar trends were seen in hospital revenue structures from both inpatient services and from outpatient and accident and emergency services. Thus, Beijing's reforms successfully contained rising medical expenditures and optimized hospitals' revenue structures. These reforms can provide a reference for further public hospital reforms in China and other countries with similar systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Lu & Shi, Leiyu & Meng, Qingyue & Kong, Xiangrong & Guo, Moning & Lu, Feng, 2021. "Effect of healthcare system reforms on public hospitals’ revenue structures: Evidence from Beijing, China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:283:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621005426
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621005426
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114210?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas G. McGuire & Mark V. Pauly, 1991. "Physician Response to Fee Changes with Multiple Payers," Papers 0015, Boston University - Industry Studies Programme.
    2. Chen, Chun & Dong, Weizhen & Shen, Jay J. & Cochran, Christopher & Wang, Ying & Hao, Mo, 2014. "Is the prescribing behavior of Chinese physicians driven by financial incentives?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 40-48.
    3. Yip, Winnie C., 1998. "Physician response to Medicare fee reductions: changes in the volume of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgeries in the Medicare and private sectors," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 675-699, December.
    4. McGuire, Thomas G. & Pauly, Mark V., 1991. "Physician response to fee changes with multiple payers," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 385-410.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu, Hongqiao & Li, Ling & Yip, Winnie, 2018. "Intended and unintended impacts of price changes for drugs and medical services: Evidence from China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 114-122.
    2. Currie, Janet & Lin, Wanchuan & Zhang, Wei, 2011. "Patient knowledge and antibiotic abuse: Evidence from an audit study in China," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 933-949.
    3. Christopher S. Brunt, 2015. "Medicare Part B Intensity and Volume Offset," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(8), pages 1009-1026, August.
    4. Claudia Keser & Claude Montmarquette & Martin Schmidt & Cornelius Schnitzler, 2020. "Custom-made health-care: an experimental investigation," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Gao, Qiuming & Wang, Derek, 2021. "Hospital efficiency and equity in health care delivery: A study based in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    6. Lien, Hsien-Ming & Albert Ma, Ching-To & McGuire, Thomas G., 2004. "Provider-client interactions and quantity of health care use," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1261-1283, November.
    7. Kantarevic, Jasmin & Kralj, Boris & Weinkauf, Darrel, 2010. "Enhanced Fee-for-Service Model and Access to Physician Services: Evidence from Family Health Groups in Ontario," IZA Discussion Papers 4862, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Jack Hadley & James Reschovsky, 2006. "Medicare fees and physicians’ medicare service volume: Beneficiaries treated and services per beneficiary," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 131-150, June.
    9. Yoshida, Atsushi & Kawamura, Akira, 2009. "Who has benefited from the health services system for the elderly in Japan?," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 256-269, August.
    10. Martin Salm & Ansgar Wübker, 2020. "Do hospitals respond to decreasing prices by supplying more services?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 209-222, February.
    11. Jack Hadley & James Reschovsky & James O’Malley & Bruce Landon, 2014. "Factors associated with geographic variation in cost per episode of care for three medical conditions," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Robert S. Huckman, 2003. "The Utilization of Competing Technologies Within the Firm: Evidence from Cardiac Procedures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 599-617, May.
    13. Pierre Azoulay & Ariel Fishman, 2020. "The Rise of For-Profit Experimental Medicine," NBER Working Papers 26892, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. He, Daifeng & Mellor, Jennifer M., 2012. "Hospital volume responses to Medicare's Outpatient Prospective Payment System: Evidence from Florida," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 730-743.
    15. Jasmin Kantarevic & Boris Kralj & Darrel Weinkauf, 2008. "Income effects and physician labour supply: evidence from the threshold system in Ontario," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 1262-1284, November.
    16. Nicholas Benson & Jose Joaquin Lopez, 2024. "Surgeons' response to reimbursement changes for alternative procedures: Evidence from spine fusion in the U.S," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 42(1), pages 41-55, January.
    17. Christopher S. Brunt & Joshua R. Hendrickson, 2021. "Geographic variation in Part B reimbursement and physician offsetting behavior: a physician matching approach," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 115-188, June.
    18. Geruso, Michael & Richards, Michael R., 2022. "Trading spaces: Medicare's regulatory spillovers on treatment setting for non-Medicare patients," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Janet Currie & Wanchuan Lin & Juanjuan Meng, 2012. "Using Audit Studies to Test for Physician Induced Demand: The Case of Antibiotic Abuse in China," NBER Working Papers 18153, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Elise Coudin & Anne Pla & Anne‐Laure Samson, 2015. "GP responses to price regulation: evidence from a French nationwide reform," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(9), pages 1118-1130, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:283:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621005426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.