Competition and cooperation in markets. The experimental case of a winner-take-all setting
AbstractThe aim of this experiment is twofold. First of all, we want to investigate whether a winner-take-all scenario where subjects with homogeneous skills meet more than once stimulates subjects' cooperation. Secondly, we want to compare agents' tendency to cooperate in settings with different levels of competition. We ran three treatments. The first one reproduces the classical public good game. The second environment represents a perfect competition market, while in the third treatment we consider a winner-take-all market. The most relevant result we obtain is that while perfect competition forces players to be efficient and to behave as they were self-interested, a winner-take-all market induces strategic cooperation.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
Volume (Year): 39 (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 (April)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175
Cooperation Competition Public good Risk aversion Winner-take-all market;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Amos Tversky & Daniel Kahneman, 1979.
"Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,"
Levine's Working Paper Archive
7656, David K. Levine.
- Kahneman, Daniel & Tversky, Amos, 1979. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 47(2), pages 263-91, March.
- Urs Fischbacher, 2007. "z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments," Experimental Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 171-178, June.
- Kräkel, Matthias & Nieken, Petra & Przemeck, Judith, 2008.
"Risk Taking in Winner-Take-All Competition,"
Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems
233, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
- Matthias KrÃ¤kel & Petra Nieken & Judith Przemeck, 2008. "Risk Taking in Winner-Take-All Competition," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers, University of Bonn, Germany bgse7_2008, University of Bonn, Germany.
- Ernst Fehr & Klaus M. Schmidt, .
"Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity - Evidence and Economic Applications,"
IEW - Working Papers
075, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Ernst Fehr & Klaus Schmidt, 2000. "Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity – Evidence and Economic Applications," CESifo Working Paper Series 403, CESifo Group Munich.
- Fehr, Ernst & Schmidt, Klaus M., 2001. "Theories of Fairness and Reciprocity - Evidence and Economic Applications," CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers 2703, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ledyard, John O., .
"Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research,"
Working Papers, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences
861, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
- Knetsch, Jack L & Sinden, J A, 1984. "Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 99(3), pages 507-21, August.
- Friedman, J W, 1969.
"On Experimental Research in Oligopoly,"
Review of Economic Studies, Wiley Blackwell,
Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(108), pages 399-415, October.
- James W. Friedman, 1968. "An Experimental Research in Oligopoly," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University 246, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Shlomi Dinar, 2009. "Scarcity and Cooperation Along International Rivers," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, MIT Press, vol. 9(1), pages 109-135, February.
- Urs Fischbacher & Christian ThÃ¶ni, .
"Excess Entry in an Experimental Winner-Take-All Market,"
IEW - Working Papers
086, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
- Fischbacher, Urs & Thöni, Christian, 2008. "Excess entry in an experimental winner-take-all market," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 150-163, July.
- Nicholas Bardsley & Peter Moffatt, 2007.
"The Experimetrics of Public Goods: Inferring Motivations from Contributions,"
Theory and Decision, Springer,
Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 161-193, March.
- Nicholas Bardsley & Peter Moffatt, 2005. "The Experimetrics of Public Goods: Inferring Motivations from Contributions," Discussion Papers, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham 2005-09, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
- Vernon L. Smith, 1962.
"An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 70, pages 111.
- Vernon L. Smith, 1962. "An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 70, pages 322.
- Ananish Chaudhuri & Sara Graziano & Pushkar Maitra, 2006. "Social Learning and Norms in a Public Goods Experiment with Inter-Generational Advice -super-1," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 73(2), pages 357-380.
- Christoph Engel, 2006. "How Much Collusion. A Meta-Analysis On Oligopoly Experiments," Working Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2006_27, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
- Lotito, Gianna & Migheli, Matteo & Ortona, Guido, 2011.
"Is cooperation instinctive? Evidence from the response times in a Public Goods Game,"
POLIS Working Papers, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS
161, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
- Gianna Lotito & Matteo Migheli & Guido Ortona, 2013. "Is cooperation instinctive? Evidence from the response times in a public goods game," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 123-133, July.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.