IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v165y2022ics1364032122004932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A factor analysis and self-organizing map based evaluation approach for the renewable energy heating potentials at county level: A case study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Xuejing
  • Yang, Xueqing
  • Miao, Hongfei
  • Liu, Huzhen
  • Yu, Yanzhe
  • Wang, Yaran
  • Zhang, Huan
  • You, Shijun

Abstract

Reflecting on the sharp contradictions between energy and environmental concerns, nowadays, a critical theme is to strengthen the role of renewables for heating. The majority of current renewable energy (RE) studies are for power generation, research at the macro level, with subjective evaluation methods. Aimed at filling the niche, this paper proposes an integrated approach involving the investigation of renewable energy (solar, geothermal and biomass) heating potentials, the evaluation of suitability at the county level, and the guidance of targeted policies. Accordingly, the factor analysis, an objective statistical analysis method, is employed to concentrate information and score appropriateness based on the county development level, population quality, government support and renewable resource potentials. Subsequently, the comprehensive scores for counties are categorized into four classes by self-organizing maps. In this study, a novel approach for evaluating the RE heating potentials and identifying the constraints of RE development is proposed. The heating demand and the potentials of renewables are determined on a detailed and precise scale at the county level, and the heating supply-demand is mapped with symbol sizes. Finally, specific recommendations for renewables energy development are put forward from a local planning perspective. The application of this systematic approach, which can be broadly exported and applied to other regions, will promote a strong commitment to renewable energy and significantly accelerate the transition to a clean energy supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Xuejing & Yang, Xueqing & Miao, Hongfei & Liu, Huzhen & Yu, Yanzhe & Wang, Yaran & Zhang, Huan & You, Shijun, 2022. "A factor analysis and self-organizing map based evaluation approach for the renewable energy heating potentials at county level: A case study in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:165:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122004932
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122004932
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xiaoyu & Luo, Dongkun & Zhao, Xu & Sun, Zhu, 2018. "Estimates of energy consumption in China using a self-adaptive multi-verse optimizer-based support vector machine with rolling cross-validation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 539-548.
    2. Guo, Siyue & Yan, Da & Hu, Shan & Zhang, Yang, 2021. "Modelling building energy consumption in China under different future scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Chen, Falin & Lu, Shyi-Min & Wang, Eric & Tseng, Kuo-Tung, 2010. "Renewable energy in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 2029-2038, September.
    4. Yu, Yanzhe & Cheng, Jie & You, Shijun & Ye, Tianzhen & Zhang, Huan & Fan, Man & Wei, Shen & Liu, Shan, 2019. "Effect of implementing building energy efficiency labeling in China: A case study in Shanghai," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    5. Zhang, Dahai & Wang, Jiaqi & Lin, Yonggang & Si, Yulin & Huang, Can & Yang, Jing & Huang, Bin & Li, Wei, 2017. "Present situation and future prospect of renewable energy in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 865-871.
    6. Suganthi, L. & Iniyan, S. & Samuel, Anand A., 2015. "Applications of fuzzy logic in renewable energy systems – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 585-607.
    7. Pan, Shu-Yuan & Gao, Mengyao & Shah, Kinjal J. & Zheng, Jianming & Pei, Si-Lu & Chiang, Pen-Chi, 2019. "Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 19-32.
    8. Mirzanamadi, Raheb & Hagentoft, Carl-Eric & Johansson, Pär, 2020. "Coupling a Hydronic Heating Pavement to a Horizontal Ground Heat Exchanger for harvesting solar energy and heating road surfaces," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 447-463.
    9. Davoudabadi, Reza & Mousavi, Seyed Meysam & Mohagheghi, Vahid, 2021. "A new decision model based on DEA and simulation to evaluate renewable energy projects under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy uncertainty," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1588-1601.
    10. Bian, Yiwen & He, Ping & Xu, Hao, 2013. "Estimation of potential energy saving and carbon dioxide emission reduction in China based on an extended non-radial DEA approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 962-971.
    11. Tang, Ningning & Zhang, Yuning & Niu, Yuguang & Du, Xiaoze, 2018. "Solar energy curtailment in China: Status quo, reasons and solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 509-528.
    12. Zheng, Guozhong & Wang, Xiao, 2020. "The comprehensive evaluation of renewable energy system schemes in tourist resorts based on VIKOR method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    13. Lizhi Zhang & Fan Li & Bo Sun & Chenghui Zhang, 2019. "Integrated Optimization Design of Combined Cooling, Heating, and Power System Coupled with Solar and Biomass Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, February.
    14. Çelikbilek, Yakup & Tüysüz, Fatih, 2016. "An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1246-1258.
    15. Poggi, Francesca & Firmino, Ana & Amado, Miguel, 2018. "Planning renewable energy in rural areas: Impacts on occupation and land use," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 630-640.
    16. Kim, Kyung-Taek & Lee, Deok Joo & Park, Sung-Joon & Zhang, Yanshuai & Sultanov, Azamat, 2015. "Measuring the efficiency of the investment for renewable energy in Korea using data envelopment analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 694-702.
    17. Kahraman, Cengiz & Kaya, İhsan & Cebi, Selcuk, 2009. "A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1603-1616.
    18. Chen, Falin & Lu, Shyi-Min & Tseng, Kuo-Tung & Lee, Si-Chen & Wang, Eric, 2010. "Assessment of renewable energy reserves in Taiwan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2511-2528, December.
    19. Kljajić, Miroslav V. & Anđelković, Aleksandar S. & Hasik, Vaclav & Munćan, Vladimir M. & Bilec, Melissa, 2020. "Shallow geothermal energy integration in district heating system: An example from Serbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P2), pages 2791-2800.
    20. Benedek, József & Sebestyén, Tihamér-Tibor & Bartók, Blanka, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable energy sources in peripheral areas and renewable energy-based rural development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 516-535.
    21. Şengül, Ümran & Eren, Miraç & Eslamian Shiraz, Seyedhadi & Gezder, Volkan & Şengül, Ahmet Bilal, 2015. "Fuzzy TOPSIS method for ranking renewable energy supply systems in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 617-625.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Çolak, Murat & Kaya, İhsan, 2017. "Prioritization of renewable energy alternatives by using an integrated fuzzy MCDM model: A real case application for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 840-853.
    2. Çelikbilek, Yakup & Tüysüz, Fatih, 2016. "An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 1246-1258.
    3. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    4. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    5. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    6. Strantzali, Eleni & Aravossis, Konstantinos, 2016. "Decision making in renewable energy investments: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 885-898.
    7. Songrui Li & Yitang Hu, 2022. "A Multi-Criteria Framework to Evaluate the Sustainability of Renewable Energy: A 2-Tuple Linguistic Grey Relation Model from the Perspective of the Prospect Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    8. Esra Karaka & Ozan Veli Y ld ran, 2019. "Evaluation of Renewable Energy Alternatives for Turkey via Modified Fuzzy AHP," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(2), pages 31-39.
    9. Yilan, Gülşah & Kadirgan, M.A. Neşet & Çiftçioğlu, Gökçen A., 2020. "Analysis of electricity generation options for sustainable energy decision making: The case of Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 519-529.
    10. Karaaslan, Abdulkerim & Gezen, Mesliha, 2022. "The evaluation of renewable energy resources in Turkey by integer multi-objective selection problem with interval coefficient," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 842-854.
    11. Alizadeh, Reza & Soltanisehat, Leili & Lund, Peter D. & Zamanisabzi, Hamed, 2020. "Improving renewable energy policy planning and decision-making through a hybrid MCDM method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    12. Dongxiao Niu & Hao Zhen & Min Yu & Keke Wang & Lijie Sun & Xiaomin Xu, 2020. "Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives for China by Using a Hybrid FMCDM Methodology with Uncertain Information," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Karunakaran Venkatesan & Uma Govindarajan & Padmanathan Kasinathan & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban & Jens Bo Holm-Nielsen & Zbigniew Leonowicz, 2019. "Economic Analysis of HRES Systems with Energy Storage During Grid Interruptions and Curtailment in Tamil Nadu, India: A Hybrid RBFNOEHO Technique," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Ezbakhe, Fatine & Pérez-Foguet, Agustí, 2021. "Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 601-613.
    15. Pasquale Contestabile & Vincenzo Ferrante & Diego Vicinanza, 2015. "Wave Energy Resource along the Coast of Santa Catarina (Brazil)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-25, December.
    16. Feng, Chun-Chiang & Chang, Kuei-Feng & Lin, Jin-Xu & Lee, Tsung-Chen & Lin, Shih-Mo, 2022. "Toward green transition in the post Paris Agreement era: The case of Taiwan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    17. Pei-Hsuan Tsai & Chih-Jou Chen & Ho-Chin Yang, 2021. "Using Porter’s Diamond Model to Assess the Competitiveness of Taiwan’s Solar Photovoltaic Industry," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    18. Shih-Chieh Huang & Shang-Lien Lo & Yen-Ching Lin, 2013. "To Re-Explore the Causality between Barriers to Renewable Energy Development: A Case Study of Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Koua, Blaise K. & Koffi, Paul Magloire E. & Gbaha, Prosper & Touré, Siaka, 2015. "Present status and overview of potential of renewable energy in Cote d’Ivoire," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 907-914.
    20. Nie, S. & Huang, Charley Z. & Huang, G.H. & Li, Y.P. & Chen, J.P. & Fan, Y.R. & Cheng, G.H., 2016. "Planning renewable energy in electric power system for sustainable development under uncertainty – A case study of Beijing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 772-786.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:165:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122004932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.