IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v178y2021icp226-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and wheat straw using two-dimensional mathematical models and an artificial neural network

Author

Listed:
  • Abdel daiem, Mahmoud M.
  • Hatata, Ahmed
  • Galal, Osama H.
  • Said, Noha
  • Ahmed, Dalia

Abstract

Anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge with wheat straw has been applied in this study. Four novel two-dimensional mathematical models (TDMMs) along with an artificial neural network (ANN) have been used to simulate and predict the biogas production via anaerobic co-digestion process. In addition, a proposed moth flame optimization (MFO) technique is used to identify the optimal structure of the proposed multilayer feedforward neural network (MFFNN) to predict the produced biogas, then, a comparison is conducted based on the results obtained from both TDMMs and ANN. The experimental results demonstrated that the co-digestion at 7% mixing ratio (straw to sludge based on weight) improved the C/N ratio to 35, and the highest yield of biogas (15-fold higher than sludge mono) was recorded, along with the largest reductions in the total solids (TS), volatile solids (TVS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) with percentages of 58.06%, 66.55% and 74.67%, respectively. The four introduced TDMMs showed high correlation with the experimental data. Among them, the logistic kinetic model is considered the best one for the experimental data representation. However, the ANN results showed that the training, validation and testing of the MFFNN-MFO model yielded very high correlation coefficients in comparison with the other used models, demonstrating that it is the most useful tool for modeling the biogas production process. These findings can support decision-makers in the establishment of sustainable development strategies that utilize ecofriendly technologies for efficient power generation from biomass residues and in predicting the model behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdel daiem, Mahmoud M. & Hatata, Ahmed & Galal, Osama H. & Said, Noha & Ahmed, Dalia, 2021. "Prediction of biogas production from anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and wheat straw using two-dimensional mathematical models and an artificial neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 226-240.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:178:y:2021:i:c:p:226-240
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148121009162
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cao, Yucheng & Pawłowski, Artur, 2012. "Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: Brief overview and energy efficiency assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 1657-1665.
    2. Gueguim Kana, E.B. & Oloke, J.K. & Lateef, A. & Adesiyan, M.O., 2012. "Modeling and optimization of biogas production on saw dust and other co-substrates using Artificial Neural network and Genetic Algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 276-281.
    3. Claudia Bruna Rizzardini & Daniele Goi, 2014. "Sustainability of Domestic Sewage Sludge Disposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-11, April.
    4. Abu Qdais, H. & Bani Hani, K. & Shatnawi, N., 2010. "Modeling and optimization of biogas production from a waste digester using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 359-363.
    5. Elsakaan, Asmaa A. & El-Sehiemy, Ragab A. & Kaddah, Sahar S. & Elsaid, Mohammed I., 2018. "An enhanced moth-flame optimizer for solving non-smooth economic dispatch problems with emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1063-1078.
    6. Said, N. & El-Shatoury, S.A. & Díaz, L.F. & Zamorano, M., 2013. "Quantitative appraisal of biomass resources and their energy potential in Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 84-91.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abdel daiem, Mahmoud M. & Hatata, Ahmed & Said, Noha, 2022. "Modeling and optimization of semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of activated sludge and wheat straw using Nonlinear Autoregressive Exogenous neural network and seagull algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdel daiem, Mahmoud M. & Hatata, Ahmed & Said, Noha, 2022. "Modeling and optimization of semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of activated sludge and wheat straw using Nonlinear Autoregressive Exogenous neural network and seagull algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    2. Djatkov, Djordje & Effenberger, Mathias & Martinov, Milan, 2014. "Method for assessing and improving the efficiency of agricultural biogas plants based on fuzzy logic and expert systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 163-175.
    3. Pomeroy, Brett & Grilc, Miha & Likozar, Blaž, 2022. "Artificial neural networks for bio-based chemical production or biorefining: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    4. Jayne Lois San Juan & Carlo James Caligan & Maria Mikayla Garcia & Jericho Mitra & Andres Philip Mayol & Charlle Sy & Aristotle Ubando & Alvin Culaba, 2020. "Multi-Objective Optimization of an Integrated Algal and Sludge-Based Bioenergy Park and Wastewater Treatment System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Shahbeig, Hossein & Nosrati, Mohsen, 2020. "Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for bioenergy production: Thermo-kinetic studies, evolved gas analysis, and techno-socio-economic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Iftikhar Ahmad & Adil Sana & Manabu Kano & Izzat Iqbal Cheema & Brenno C. Menezes & Junaid Shahzad & Zahid Ullah & Muzammil Khan & Asad Habib, 2021. "Machine Learning Applications in Biofuels’ Life Cycle: Soil, Feedstock, Production, Consumption, and Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Kamel, Salah & El-Sattar, Hoda Abd & Vera, David & Jurado, Francisco, 2018. "Bioenergy potential from agriculture residues for energy generation in Egypt," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 28-37.
    8. Elahi, Ehsan & Zhang, Zhixin & Khalid, Zainab & Xu, Haiyun, 2022. "Application of an artificial neural network to optimise energy inputs: An energy- and cost-saving strategy for commercial poultry farms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    9. Fabio Merzari & Jillian Goldfarb & Gianni Andreottola & Tanja Mimmo & Maurizio Volpe & Luca Fiori, 2020. "Hydrothermal Carbonization as a Strategy for Sewage Sludge Management: Influence of Process Withdrawal Point on Hydrochar Properties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    10. Suraj Adebayo Opatokun & Ana Lopez-Sabiron & German Ferreira & Vladimir Strezov, 2017. "Life Cycle Analysis of Energy Production from Food Waste through Anaerobic Digestion, Pyrolysis and Integrated Energy System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Farhad Beik & Leon Williams & Tim Brown & Stuart T. Wagland, 2021. "Managing Non-Sewered Human Waste Using Thermochemical Waste Treatment Technologies: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-22, November.
    12. Katinas, Vladislovas & Marčiukaitis, Mantas & Perednis, Eugenijus & Dzenajavičienė, Eugenija Farida, 2019. "Analysis of biodegradable waste use for energy generation in Lithuania," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 559-567.
    13. Ru Fang, Yan & Zhang, Silu & Zhou, Ziqiao & Shi, Wenjun & Hui Xie, Guang, 2022. "Sustainable development in China: Valuation of bioenergy potential and CO2 reduction from crop straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    14. Syed-Hassan, Syed Shatir A. & Wang, Yi & Hu, Song & Su, Sheng & Xiang, Jun, 2017. "Thermochemical processing of sewage sludge to energy and fuel: Fundamentals, challenges and considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 888-913.
    15. Salah Jellali & Yassine Charabi & Muhammad Usman & Abdullah Al-Badi & Mejdi Jeguirim, 2021. "Investigations on Biogas Recovery from Anaerobic Digestion of Raw Sludge and Its Mixture with Agri-Food Wastes: Application to the Largest Industrial Estate in Oman," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    16. Ziad M. Ali & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem & Ahmed I. Omar & Bahaa Saad Mahmoud, 2022. "Economical-Environmental-Technical Operation of Power Networks with High Penetration of Renewable Energy Systems Using Multi-Objective Coronavirus Herd Immunity Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-43, April.
    17. Li, Chaoshun & Wang, Wenxiao & Chen, Deshu, 2019. "Multi-objective complementary scheduling of hydro-thermal-RE power system via a multi-objective hybrid grey wolf optimizer," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 241-255.
    18. Ahmed I. Omar & Ziad M. Ali & Mostafa Al-Gabalawy & Shady H. E. Abdel Aleem & Mujahed Al-Dhaifallah, 2020. "Multi-Objective Environmental Economic Dispatch of an Electricity System Considering Integrated Natural Gas Units and Variable Renewable Energy Sources," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-37, July.
    19. Jha, Sunil Kr. & Bilalovic, Jasmin & Jha, Anju & Patel, Nilesh & Zhang, Han, 2017. "Renewable energy: Present research and future scope of Artificial Intelligence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 297-317.
    20. Emma Lindkvist & Maria T. Johansson & Jakob Rosenqvist, 2017. "Methodology for Analysing Energy Demand in Biogas Production Plants—A Comparative Study of Two Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:178:y:2021:i:c:p:226-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.