IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v163y2021icp1701-1710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Novel technique for sustainable utilisation of water hyacinth using EGSB and MCSTR: Control overgrowth, energy recovery, and microbial metabolic mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Jianfeng
  • Tang, Zhengkang
  • Wang, Changmei
  • Wu, Kai
  • Song, Yuanlin
  • Wang, Xingping
  • Zhang, Zhiwen
  • Zhao, Xingling
  • Yang, Bin
  • Piao, Mingguo
  • Yin, Fang
  • Zhang, Wudi

Abstract

An expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) and modified continuous stirred tank reactor (MCSTR) were investigated with respect to the treatment of water hyacinth juice (WHJ) and water hyacinth residue (WHR), to promote the utilisation of water hyacinth as a resource and control its excessive growth. The results revealed that EGSB and MCSTR can efficiently manage WHJ and WHR. The energy recovery efficiency of water hyacinth was 21.10 m3 biogas/t, wherein the WHJ in EGSB produced 0.190 m3 biogas/kg chemical oxygen demand, and the WHR in MCSTR generated 397 mL biogas/g total solid. High-throughput sequencing analyses indicated that the MCSTR and EGSB had similar dominant microbial composition in the hydrolytic acidification phase, while genus norank_o__NB1-n was unique to the MCSTR. The methanogenesis metabolic pathways of WHR contained both acetoclastic methanogenesis and hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, where the dominant functional microorganisms were Methanosaeta and Methanobacterium, respectively. However, the methanogenetic metabolic pathways of WHJ involved only acetoclastic methanogenesis, with Methanosaeta as the dominant functional microorganism. A novel processing technology for the sustainable utilisation of water hyacinth was successfully established. This technology allowed for substance circulation and energy exchange in the ecosystem and is suitable for industrial applications owing to its performance, cost, and environment-friendly characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Jianfeng & Tang, Zhengkang & Wang, Changmei & Wu, Kai & Song, Yuanlin & Wang, Xingping & Zhang, Zhiwen & Zhao, Xingling & Yang, Bin & Piao, Mingguo & Yin, Fang & Zhang, Wudi, 2021. "Novel technique for sustainable utilisation of water hyacinth using EGSB and MCSTR: Control overgrowth, energy recovery, and microbial metabolic mechanism," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1701-1710.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:163:y:2021:i:c:p:1701-1710
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120316591
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.10.093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nizami, A.S. & Orozco, A. & Groom, E. & Dieterich, B. & Murphy, J.D., 2012. "How much gas can we get from grass?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 783-790.
    2. Tian, Guangliang & Yang, Bin & Dong, Minghua & Zhu, Rui & Yin, Fang & Zhao, Xingling & Wang, Yongxia & Xiao, Wei & Wang, Qiang & Zhang, Wudi & Cui, Xiaolong, 2018. "The effect of temperature on the microbial communities of peak biogas production in batch biogas reactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 15-25.
    3. Alessandra Cesaro & Vincenzo Belgiorno, 2015. "Combined Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Maitriwong, Kiatchai & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2019. "Production of biogas from cassava wastewater using a three-stage upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 191-205.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, F. & Brewer, C.E., 2021. "Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    2. Nie, Erqi & He, Pinjing & Zhang, Hua & Hao, Liping & Shao, Liming & Lü, Fan, 2021. "How does temperature regulate anaerobic digestion?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    3. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Valerii Havrysh & Antonina Kalinichenko & Grzegorz Mentel & Tadeusz Olejarz, 2020. "Commercial Biogas Plants: Lessons for Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Abdulkhani, Ali & Alizadeh, Peyman & Hedjazi, Sahab & Hamzeh, Yahya, 2017. "Potential of Soya as a raw material for a whole crop biorefinery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1269-1280.
    6. Ouda, O.K.M. & Raza, S.A. & Nizami, A.S. & Rehan, M. & Al-Waked, R. & Korres, N.E., 2016. "Waste to energy potential: A case study of Saudi Arabia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 328-340.
    7. Browne, James D. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2013. "Assessment of the resource associated with biomethane from food waste," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 170-177.
    8. Vasmara, Ciro & Marchetti, Rosa & Carminati, Domenico, 2021. "Wastewater from the production of lactic acid bacteria as feedstock in anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Alun Scott & Richard Blanchard, 2021. "The Role of Anaerobic Digestion in Reducing Dairy Farm Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Carlos S. Ciria & Marina Sanz & Juan Carrasco & Pilar Ciria, 2019. "Identification of Arable Marginal Lands under Rainfed Conditions for Bioenergy Purposes in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, March.
    11. Joanna Berlowska & Katarzyna Pielech-Przybylska & Maria Balcerek & Weronika Cieciura & Sebastian Borowski & Dorota Kregiel, 2017. "Integrated Bioethanol Fermentation/Anaerobic Digestion for Valorization of Sugar Beet Pulp," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Józef Szlachta & Hubert Prask & Małgorzata Fugol & Adam Luberański, 2018. "Effect of Mechanical Pre-Treatment of the Agricultural Substrates on Yield of Biogas and Kinetics of Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-16, October.
    13. Nolan, P. & Luostarinen, S. & Doyle, E.M. & O'Kiely, P., 2016. "Anaerobic digestion of perennial ryegrass prepared by cryogenic freezing versus thermal drying methods, using contrasting in vitro batch digestion systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 273-278.
    14. Thamsiriroj, T. & Nizami, A.S. & Murphy, J.D., 2012. "Why does mono-digestion of grass silage fail in long term operation?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 64-76.
    15. Chibueze G. Achi & Amro Hassanein & Stephanie Lansing, 2020. "Enhanced Biogas Production of Cassava Wastewater Using Zeolite and Biochar Additives and Manure Co-Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2017. "Biogas Engine Waste Heat Recovery Using Organic Rankine Cycle," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Chen, Jiaxin & Zhang, Biying & Luo, Lingli & Zhang, Fan & Yi, Yanglei & Shan, Yuanyuan & Liu, Bianfang & Zhou, Yuan & Wang, Xin & Lü, Xin, 2021. "A review on recycling techniques for bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    18. Yong, Zihan & Dong, Yulin & Zhang, Xu & Tan, Tianwei, 2015. "Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 527-530.
    19. Seneesrisakul, Kessara & Jantaruksa, Todsapon & Jiraprasertwong, Achiraya & Pornmai, Krittiya & Rangsunvigit, Pramoch & Chavadej, Sumaeth, 2021. "Effects of the reactor volumetric ratio and recycle ratio on the methane and energy productivity of a three-step anaerobic sequencing batch reactor (3S-ASBR) treating ethanol wastewater," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    20. Li, Dong & Huang, Xianbo & Wang, Qingjing & Yuan, Yuexiang & Yan, Zhiying & Li, Zhidong & Huang, Yajun & Liu, Xiaofeng, 2016. "Kinetics of methane production and hydrolysis in anaerobic digestion of corn stover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-9.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:163:y:2021:i:c:p:1701-1710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.