IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v140y2019icp190-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of Gaussian Process power curve models based on different stationary covariance functions for the purpose of improving model accuracy

Author

Listed:
  • Pandit, Ravi Kumar
  • Infield, David

Abstract

Gaussian Process (GP) models are increasingly finding application in wind turbine condition monitoring and in particular early fault detection. GP model accuracy is greatly influenced by the choice and type of the covariance functions (used to described the similarity between two given data points). Hence, the appropriate selection and composition of covariance functions is essential for accurate GP modelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Pandit, Ravi Kumar & Infield, David, 2019. "Comparative analysis of Gaussian Process power curve models based on different stationary covariance functions for the purpose of improving model accuracy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 190-202.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:140:y:2019:i:c:p:190-202
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148119303520
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2019.03.047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abhirup Datta & Sudipto Banerjee & Andrew O. Finley & Alan E. Gelfand, 2016. "Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(514), pages 800-812, April.
    2. Hameed, Z. & Hong, Y.S. & Cho, Y.M. & Ahn, S.H. & Song, C.K., 2009. "Condition monitoring and fault detection of wind turbines and related algorithms: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 1-39, January.
    3. Kusiak, Andrew & Zheng, Haiyang & Song, Zhe, 2009. "Models for monitoring wind farm power," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 583-590.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Shuai & Xiang, Yue & Zhang, Hongcai & Xie, Shanyi & Li, Jianhua & Gu, Chenghong & Sun, Wei & Liu, Junyong, 2021. "Hybrid forecasting method for wind power integrating spatial correlation and corrected numerical weather prediction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Francisco Bilendo & Angela Meyer & Hamed Badihi & Ningyun Lu & Philippe Cambron & Bin Jiang, 2022. "Applications and Modeling Techniques of Wind Turbine Power Curve for Wind Farms—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Peng & Li, Jian & Wang, Caisheng & Lei, Xiao, 2016. "A generalized model for wind turbine anomaly identification based on SCADA data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 550-567.
    2. Cambron, P. & Lepvrier, R. & Masson, C. & Tahan, A. & Pelletier, F., 2016. "Power curve monitoring using weighted moving average control charts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 126-135.
    3. Lapira, Edzel & Brisset, Dustin & Davari Ardakani, Hossein & Siegel, David & Lee, Jay, 2012. "Wind turbine performance assessment using multi-regime modeling approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 86-95.
    4. Li, Yanting & Liu, Shujun & Shu, Lianjie, 2019. "Wind turbine fault diagnosis based on Gaussian process classifiers applied to operational data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 357-366.
    5. Beganovic, Nejra & Söffker, Dirk, 2016. "Structural health management utilization for lifetime prognosis and advanced control strategy deployment of wind turbines: An overview and outlook concerning actual methods, tools, and obtained result," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 68-83.
    6. Matthias Katzfuss & Joseph Guinness & Wenlong Gong & Daniel Zilber, 2020. "Vecchia Approximations of Gaussian-Process Predictions," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 25(3), pages 383-414, September.
    7. Fassò, A. & Finazzi, F. & Madonna, F., 2018. "Statistical issues in radiosonde observation of atmospheric temperature and humidity profiles," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 97-100.
    8. Habibi, Hamed & Howard, Ian & Simani, Silvio, 2019. "Reliability improvement of wind turbine power generation using model-based fault detection and fault tolerant control: A review," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 877-896.
    9. Rana Muhammad Adnan & Zhongmin Liang & Xiaohui Yuan & Ozgur Kisi & Muhammad Akhlaq & Binquan Li, 2019. "Comparison of LSSVR, M5RT, NF-GP, and NF-SC Models for Predictions of Hourly Wind Speed and Wind Power Based on Cross-Validation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-22, January.
    10. Xueli An & Dongxiang Jiang, 2014. "Bearing fault diagnosis of wind turbine based on intrinsic time-scale decomposition frequency spectrum," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(6), pages 558-566, December.
    11. Le Zhang & Qiang Yang, 2020. "Investigation of the Design and Fault Prediction Method for an Abrasive Particle Sensor Used in Wind Turbine Gearbox," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Ding Zhai & Anyang Lu & Jinghao Li & Qingling Zhang, 2016. "Fault detection for singular switched linear systems with multiple time-varying delay in finite frequency domain," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(13), pages 3232-3257, October.
    13. Jin, Xin & Ju, Wenbin & Zhang, Zhaolong & Guo, Lianxin & Yang, Xiangang, 2016. "System safety analysis of large wind turbines," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1293-1307.
    14. Edgar Santos‐Fernandez & Erin E. Peterson & Julie Vercelloni & Em Rushworth & Kerrie Mengersen, 2021. "Correcting misclassification errors in crowdsourced ecological data: A Bayesian perspective," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 147-173, January.
    15. Zhang, Zijun & Kusiak, Andrew & Song, Zhe, 2013. "Scheduling electric power production at a wind farm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 227-238.
    16. Ruiz de la Hermosa González-Carrato, Raúl & García Márquez, Fausto Pedro & Dimlaye, Vichaar, 2015. "Maintenance management of wind turbines structures via MFCs and wavelet transforms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 472-482.
    17. Sellak, Hamza & Ouhbi, Brahim & Frikh, Bouchra & Palomares, Iván, 2017. "Towards next-generation energy planning decision-making: An expert-based framework for intelligent decision support," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1544-1577.
    18. Isabelle Grenier & Bruno Sansó & Jessica L. Matthews, 2024. "Multivariate nearest‐neighbors Gaussian processes with random covariance matrices," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(3), May.
    19. Sierra Pugh & Matthew J. Heaton & Jeff Svedin & Neil Hansen, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Lagged Models for Variable Rate Irrigation in Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(4), pages 634-650, December.
    20. Quan Zhou & Taotao Xiong & Mubin Wang & Chenmeng Xiang & Qingpeng Xu, 2017. "Diagnosis and Early Warning of Wind Turbine Faults Based on Cluster Analysis Theory and Modified ANFIS," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:140:y:2019:i:c:p:190-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.