IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v199y2020ics095183201930907x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A resilience measure for supply chain systems considering the interruption with the cyber-physical systems

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Liwei
  • Dui, Hongyan
  • Zhang, Chi

Abstract

In supply chain systems, the entities supplier, manufacturer and distribution center make up the communication platform, which can obtain the data of production, stock, demand, etc. The cyber-physical system (CPS) typically involves multiple computational platforms interacting over communication networks. In the CPS, when the supply chain is disturbed and interruption occurs, supply chain resilience measurement is important to reduce order losses in the supply chain. In this paper, firstly, according to the operational characteristics of different resilience measures, strategy of the supply chain in the interrupted environment is described. Secondly, based on the cost composition of the supply chain operating in the interrupted environment, measurement model of supply chain resilience is established. Thirdly, by introducing the time that the customers can wait as an indicator to represent the external demand environment of supply chain, the customer expectation can be distinguished quantitatively, and the customer expectation factor can be integrated into the measurement model of supply chain resilience. Finally, based on the measurement model of supply chain resilience, quantitative results of the supply chain resilience measurement are obtained, and the relationship between the results and resilience measures is analyzed based on resilience analysis, which illustrates the relationship between the unit capital investment and its ability to reduce order losses.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Liwei & Dui, Hongyan & Zhang, Chi, 2020. "A resilience measure for supply chain systems considering the interruption with the cyber-physical systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:199:y:2020:i:c:s095183201930907x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201930907X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2016. "A review of definitions and measures of system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 47-61.
    2. Lücker, Florian & Seifert, Ralf W., 2017. "Building up Resilience in a Pharmaceutical Supply Chain through Inventory, Dual Sourcing and Agility Capacity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 114-124.
    3. Cerqueti, Roy & Ferraro, Giovanna & Iovanella, Antonio, 2019. "Measuring network resilience through connection patterns," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 320-329.
    4. Cardoso, Sónia R. & Paula Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana & Relvas, Susana & Novais, Augusto Q., 2015. "Resilience metrics in the assessment of complex supply-chains performance operating under demand uncertainty," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 53-73.
    5. Tang, Ou & Nurmaya Musa, S., 2011. "Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 25-34, September.
    6. Eleftherios Iakovou & Dimitrios Vlachos & Anastasios Xanthopoulos, 2007. "An analytical methodological framework for the optimal design of resilient supply chains," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 1-20.
    7. Kevin B. Hendricks & Vinod R. Singhal, 2005. "Association Between Supply Chain Glitches and Operating Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(5), pages 695-711, May.
    8. Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel & Rocco, Claudio M., 2013. "Resilience-based network component importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 89-97.
    9. Xing, Liudong & Levitin, Gregory, 2017. "Balancing theft and corruption threats by data partition in cloud system with independent server protection," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 248-254.
    10. Dui, Hongyan & Li, Shumin & Xing, Liudong & Liu, Hanlin, 2019. "System performance-based joint importance analysis guided maintenance for repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 162-175.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dui, Hongyan & Chen, Shuanshuan & Wang, Jia, 2021. "Failure-oriented maintenance analysis of nodes and edges in network systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Moghadasi, Negin & Collier, Zachary A. & Koch, Andrew & Slutzky, David L. & Polmateer, Thomas L. & Manasco, Mark C. & Lambert, James H., 2022. "Trust and security of electric vehicle-to-grid systems and hardware supply chains," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Matthias Klumpp & Dominic Loske, 2021. "Sustainability and Resilience Revisited: Impact of Information Technology Disruptions on Empirical Retail Logistics Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Núñez-Merino, Miguel & Maqueira-Marín, Juan Manuel & Moyano-Fuentes, José & Castaño-Moraga, Carlos Alberto, 2022. "Industry 4.0 and supply chain. A Systematic Science Mapping analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    5. Huang, Cheng-Hao & Huang, Ding-Hsiang & Lin, Yi-Kuei, 2023. "Network reliability prediction for random capacitated-flow networks via an artificial neural network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    6. Hongyan Dui & Xiaoqian Zheng & Jianjun Guo & Hui Xiao, 2022. "Importance measure-based resilience analysis of a wind power generation system," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(3), pages 395-405, June.
    7. Balan Sundarakani & Okey Peter Onyia, 2021. "Fast, furious and focused approach to Covid-19 response: an examination of the financial and business resilience of the UAE logistics industry," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 237-258, December.
    8. Dui, Hongyan & Zheng, Xiaoqian & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Resilience analysis of maritime transportation systems based on importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    9. Clavijo-Buritica, Nicolás & Triana-Sanchez, Laura & Escobar, John Willmer, 2023. "A hybrid modeling approach for resilient agri-supply network design in emerging countries: Colombian coffee supply chain," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    10. Bhavya Sharma & Murari Lal Mittal & Gunjan Soni & Bharti Ramtiyal, 2023. "An Implementation Framework for Resiliency Assessment in a Supply Chain," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 24(4), pages 591-614, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Chao & Xu, Xin & Dui, Hongyan, 2020. "Resilience Measure of Network Systems by Node and Edge Indicators," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. MacKenzie, Cameron A. & Hu, Chao, 2019. "Decision making under uncertainty for design of resilient engineered systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    3. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Ivanov, Dmitry & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2019. "Review of quantitative methods for supply chain resilience analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 285-307.
    4. Márcio das Chagas Moura & Helder Henrique Lima Diniz & Enrique López Droguett & Beatriz Sales da Cunha & Isis Didier Lins & Vicente Ribeiro Simoni, 2017. "Embedding resilience in the design of the electricity supply for industrial clients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-33, November.
    5. Schmidt, Christoph G. & Wuttke, David A. & Heese, H. Sebastian & Wagner, Stephan M., 2023. "Antecedents of public reactions to supply chain glitches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    6. Trucco, Paolo & Petrenj, Boris, 2023. "Characterisation of resilience metrics in full-scale applications to interdependent infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    9. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Landegren, Finn & Höst, Martin & Möller, Peter, 2018. "Simulation based assessment of resilience of two large-scale socio-technical IT networks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 112-125.
    11. Ouyang, Min & Liu, Chuang & Xu, Min, 2019. "Value of resilience-based solutions on critical infrastructure protection: Comparing with robustness-based solutions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Zhao, S. & Liu, X. & Zhuo, Y., 2017. "Hybrid Hidden Markov Models for resilience metrics in a dynamic infrastructure system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 84-97.
    13. Claudio M Rocco & Kash Barker & Jose Moronta & Jose E Ramirez-Marquez, 2018. "Community detection and resilience in multi-source, multi-terminal networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(6), pages 616-626, December.
    14. Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. & Rocco, Claudio M. & Barker, Kash & Moronta, Jose, 2018. "Quantifying the resilience of community structures in networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 466-474.
    15. Gonçalves, L.A.P.J. & Ribeiro, P.J.G., 2020. "Resilience of urban transportation systems. Concept, characteristics, and methods," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Almoghathawi, Yasser & Barker, Kash & Albert, Laura A., 2019. "Resilience-driven restoration model for interdependent infrastructure networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 12-23.
    17. Margolis, Joshua T. & Sullivan, Kelly M. & Mason, Scott J. & Magagnotti, Mariah, 2018. "A multi-objective optimization model for designing resilient supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 174-185.
    18. Xu, Zhaoping & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel & Liu, Yu & Xiahou, Tangfan, 2020. "A new resilience-based component importance measure for multi-state networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Dui, Hongyan & Zheng, Xiaoqian & Wu, Shaomin, 2021. "Resilience analysis of maritime transportation systems based on importance measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    20. Kakadia, Deepak & Ramirez-Marquez, Dr. Jose Emmanuel, 2020. "Quantitative approaches for optimization of user experience based on network resilience for wireless service provider networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:199:y:2020:i:c:s095183201930907x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.