IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v239y2021ics092552732100150x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Allocating fixed costs using multi-coalition epsilon equilibrium

Author

Listed:
  • Pendharkar, Parag C.

Abstract

In this paper, a multi-coalition fixed cost allocation (MCFCA) is considered. The problem is solved using epsilon equilibrium (also called ε-Nash equilibrium) concept and data envelopment analysis framework. The MCFCA epsilon equilibrium involves tradeoffs between satisfying objectives of cooperative coalitions and conflicts arising from inter-coalitions objectives. First, it is shown that a simple single objective fixed cost allocation problem is an easy problem to solve and multiple solutions satisfying traditional Nash equilibrium can be trivially obtained. Second, the MCFCA problem is proposed by using different coalitions’ objective criteria highlighted in previous studies. Third, the MCFCA problem is solved using a genetic algorithm (GA) procedure. Several real-world datasets from different domains are used to test the procedure and two different types of GA fitness functions – raw and scaled – are used. The results indicate that different fitness functions perturb solutions around the epsilon equilibrium so that multiple statistically similar solutions can be obtained to aid subjective managerial solution selection among multiple similar solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pendharkar, Parag C., 2021. "Allocating fixed costs using multi-coalition epsilon equilibrium," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:239:y:2021:i:c:s092552732100150x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552732100150X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108174?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John C. Harsanyi & Reinhard Selten, 1988. "A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262582384, December.
    2. Du, Juan & Cook, Wade D. & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Joe, 2014. "Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 206-214.
    3. Li, Yongjun & Lin, Lin & Dai, Qianzhi & Zhang, Linda, 2020. "Allocating common costs of multinational companies based on arm's length principle and Nash non-cooperative game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1002-1010.
    4. Cook, Wade D. & Kress, Moshe, 1999. "Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: A DEA approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(3), pages 652-661, December.
    5. Beasley, J. E., 2003. "Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 198-216, May.
    6. Scarf, Herbert E., 1971. "On the existence of a coopertive solution for a general class of N-person games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 169-181, June.
    7. Toloo, Mehdi & Babaee, Seddigheh, 2015. "On variable reductions in data envelopment analysis with an illustrative application to a gas company," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 270(C), pages 527-533.
    8. Zhao, Jingang, 1992. "The hybrid solutions of an N-person game," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 145-160, January.
    9. Satoru Sekine & Jing Fu & Shigeo Muto, 2014. "Game Theoretic Approaches to Weight Assignments in Data Envelopment Analysis Problems," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-9, April.
    10. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    11. Yang, Zhe & Yuan, George Xianzhi, 2019. "Some generalizations of Zhao’s theorem: Hybrid solutions and weak hybrid solutions for games with nonordered preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 94-100.
    12. Nakabayashi, Ken & Tone, Kaoru, 2006. "Egoist's dilemma: a DEA game," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 135-148, April.
    13. Joe Zhu, 2014. "DEA Cross Efficiency," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking, edition 3, chapter 4, pages 61-92, Springer.
    14. Pendharkar, Parag C. & Koehler, Gary J., 2007. "A general steady state distribution based stopping criteria for finite length genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(3), pages 1436-1451, February.
    15. Yongjun Li & Lin Lin & Qianzhi Dai & Linda Zhang, 2020. "Allocating common costs of multinational companies based on arm's length principle and Nash non-cooperative game," Post-Print hal-02508948, HAL.
    16. Yongjun Li & Feng Li & Ali Emrouznejad & Liang Liang & Qiwei Xie, 2019. "Allocating the fixed cost: an approach based on data envelopment analysis and cooperative game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 373-394, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. An, Qingxian & Tao, Xiangyang & Xiong, Beibei & Chen, Xiaohong, 2022. "Frontier-based incentive mechanisms for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 294-308.
    2. Dai, Qianzhi & Li, Yongjun & Lei, Xiyang & Wu, Dengsheng, 2021. "A DEA-based incentive approach for allocating common revenues or fixed costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 675-686.
    3. An, Qingxian & Wang, Ping & Emrouznejad, Ali & Hu, Junhua, 2020. "Fixed cost allocation based on the principle of efficiency invariance in two-stage systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(2), pages 662-675.
    4. Yongjun Li & Feng Li & Ali Emrouznejad & Liang Liang & Qiwei Xie, 2019. "Allocating the fixed cost: an approach based on data envelopment analysis and cooperative game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 373-394, March.
    5. Li, Yongjun & Lin, Lin & Dai, Qianzhi & Zhang, Linda, 2020. "Allocating common costs of multinational companies based on arm's length principle and Nash non-cooperative game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1002-1010.
    6. Tao Ding & Ya Chen & Huaqing Wu & Yuqi Wei, 2018. "Centralized fixed cost and resource allocation considering technology heterogeneity: a DEA approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 268(1), pages 497-511, September.
    7. Li, Feng & Zhu, Qingyuan & Chen, Zhi, 2019. "Allocating a fixed cost across the decision making units with two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-154.
    8. Akram Dehnokhalaji & Mojtaba Ghiyasi & Pekka Korhonen, 2017. "Resource allocation based on cost efficiency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1279-1289, October.
    9. Feng Li & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang, 2019. "A new data envelopment analysis based approach for fixed cost allocation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 347-372, March.
    10. Weiwei Zhu & Qian Zhang & Haiqing Wang, 2019. "Fixed costs and shared resources allocation in two-stage network DEA," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 278(1), pages 177-194, July.
    11. Chu, Junfei & Wu, Jie & Chu, Chengbin & Zhang, Tinglong, 2020. "DEA-based fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems: Leader-follower and satisfaction degree bargaining game approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Jiekun Song & Zhicheng Liu & Rui Chen & Xueli Leng, 2023. "Calculation and Allocation of Atmospheric Environment Governance Cost in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Xie, Qiwei & Xu, Qifan & Zhu, Da & Rao, Kaifeng & Dai, Qianzhi, 2020. "Fair allocation of wastewater discharge permits based on satisfaction criteria using data envelopment analysis," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    14. Jie Wu & Jun-Fei Chu & Liang Liang, 2016. "Target setting and allocation of carbon emissions abatement based on DEA and closest target: an application to 20 APEC economies," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(1), pages 279-296, November.
    15. Mehdi Soltanifar & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Hamid Sharafi & Sebastián Lozano, 2022. "Resource allocation and target setting: a CSW–DEA based approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 318(1), pages 557-589, November.
    16. Chih-Ching Yang, 2017. "Measuring health indicators and allocating health resources: a DEA-based approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 365-378, September.
    17. Xi Jin & Bin Zou & Chan Wang & Kaifeng Rao & Xiaowen Tang, 2019. "Carbon Emission Allocation in a Chinese Province-Level Region Based on Two-Stage Network Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, March.
    18. Menghan Chen & Sheng Ang & Lijing Jiang & Feng Yang, 2020. "Centralized resource allocation based on cross-evaluation considering organizational objective and individual preferences," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(2), pages 529-565, June.
    19. Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo & Jafar Sadeghi & Mohammad Khodabakhshi, 2017. "Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 85(2), pages 223-240, April.
    20. Adel Hatami-Marbini & Zahra Ghelej Beigi & Hirofumi Fukuyama & Kobra Gholami, 2015. "Modeling Centralized Resources Allocation and Target Setting in Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1189-1213, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:239:y:2021:i:c:s092552732100150x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.