IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v135y2012i1p222-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scheduling a maintenance activity and due-window assignment based on common flow allowance

Author

Listed:
  • Mor, Baruch
  • Mosheiov, Gur

Abstract

We study a due-window assignment problem on a single machine. The job-dependent due-windows are obtained by the common flow allowance criterion. The scheduler has the option to perform a maintenance activity which is rate modifying, i.e., improves the processing times of the following jobs. We consider a number of versions of this setting: (i) The maintenance requires a constant time, (ii) The maintenance duration is an increasing function of its starting time (linear deterioration), and (iii) The maintenance duration is position-dependent (general deterioration). We study the standard setting of regular job processing times, and investigate also the extension to position-dependent processing times. The set of potential optimal positions for the maintenance activity is fully characterized. Consequently, the problems based on all the combinations of these settings are shown to be solved in polynomial time.

Suggested Citation

  • Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2012. "Scheduling a maintenance activity and due-window assignment based on common flow allowance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 222-230.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:135:y:2012:i:1:p:222-230
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.07.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527311003148
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.07.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Suh-Jenq & Yang, Dar-Li, 2010. "Minimizing the makespan on single-machine scheduling with aging effect and variable maintenance activities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 528-533, December.
    2. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    3. De, Prabuddha & Ghosh, Jay B. & Wells, Charles E., 1994. "Solving a generalized model for CON due date assignment and sequencing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 179-185, March.
    4. Cheng, T. C. E. & Oguz, C. & Qi, X. D., 1996. "Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with compressible processing times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 29-35, May.
    5. Dvir Shabtay & George Steiner, 2007. "Optimal Due Date Assignment and Resource Allocation to Minimize the Weighted Number of Tardy Jobs on a Single Machine," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 332-350, March.
    6. Cheng, T. C. E. & Oguz, C. & Qi, X. D., 1996. "Due-date assignment and single machine scheduling with compressible processing times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 107-113, June.
    7. Gordon, V. S., 1993. "A note on optimal assignment of slack due-dates in single-machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 311-315, November.
    8. M. A. Kubzin & V. A. Strusevich, 2006. "Planning Machine Maintenance in Two-Machine Shop Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 789-800, August.
    9. Lee, C. -Y. & Leon, V. J., 2001. "Machine scheduling with a rate-modifying activity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 119-128, January.
    10. Quaddus, M. A., 1990. "A network flow approach to optimal slack due-date determination," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 265-267, January.
    11. Cheng, T. C. E., 1986. "Optimal slack due-date determination and sequencing," Engineering Costs and Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 305-309, March.
    12. Sun, Kaibiao & Li, Hongxing, 2010. "Scheduling problems with multiple maintenance activities and non-preemptive jobs on two identical parallel machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 151-158, March.
    13. Cheng, T. C. E., 1991. "Optimal constant due-date determination and sequencing of n jobs on a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 259-261, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Yu-Bin & Wan, Long & Wang, Xiao-Yuan, 2015. "Study on due-window assignment scheduling based on common flow allowance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 155-157.
    2. Janiak, Adam & Janiak, Władysław A. & Krysiak, Tomasz & Kwiatkowski, Tomasz, 2015. "A survey on scheduling problems with due windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 347-357.
    3. Xu, Dehua & Wan, Long & Liu, Aihua & Yang, Dar-Li, 2015. "Single machine total completion time scheduling problem with workload-dependent maintenance duration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 101-106.
    4. Chen, Ke & Ji, Min & Ge, Jiaojiao, 2013. "A note on scheduling a maintenance activity and due-window assignment based on common flow allowance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 645-646.
    5. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2016. "Minsum and minmax scheduling on a proportionate flowshop with common flow-allowance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 360-370.
    6. Shirvani, Nargess & Ruiz, Rubén & Shadrokh, Shahram, 2014. "Cyclic scheduling of perishable products in parallel machine with release dates, due dates and deadlines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Tan, Zhiyi & Chen, Yong & Zhang, An, 2013. "On the exact bounds of SPT for scheduling on parallel machines with availability constraints," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 293-299.
    8. Mor, Baruch & Mosheiov, Gur, 2014. "Batch scheduling with a rate-modifying maintenance activity to minimize total flowtime," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 238-242.
    9. Yang, Dar-Li & Lai, Chien-Jung & Yang, Suh-Jenq, 2014. "Scheduling problems with multiple due windows assignment and controllable processing times on a single machine," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 96-103.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George & Zhang, Rui, 2016. "Optimal coordination of resource allocation, due date assignment and scheduling decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 41-54.
    2. Du-Juan Wang & Yunqiang Yin & Shuenn-Ren Cheng & T.C.E. Cheng & Chin-Chia Wu, 2016. "Due date assignment and scheduling on a single machine with two competing agents," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1152-1169, February.
    3. Leyvand, Yaron & Shabtay, Dvir & Steiner, George, 2010. "A unified approach for scheduling with convex resource consumption functions using positional penalties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 301-312, October.
    4. Min Ji & Sai Liu & Xiaolin Zhang & Keke Cao & T. C. E. Cheng, 2017. "Sequencing Games with Slack Due Windows and Group Technology Considerations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(2), pages 121-133, February.
    5. Chun-Lai Liu & Jian-Jun Wang, 2016. "Unrelated Parallel-Machine Scheduling with Controllable Processing Times and Impact of Deteriorating Maintenance Activities under Consideration," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(01), pages 1-16, February.
    6. Gordon, Valery & Proth, Jean-Marie & Chu, Chengbin, 2002. "A survey of the state-of-the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Geurtsen, M. & Didden, Jeroen B.H.C. & Adan, J. & Atan, Z. & Adan, I., 2023. "Production, maintenance and resource scheduling: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 501-529.
    8. J-G Kim & D-H Lee, 2009. "Algorithms for common due-date assignment and sequencing on a single machine with sequence-dependent setup times," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(9), pages 1264-1272, September.
    9. Cheng, T. C. E. & Ng, C. T. & Yuan, J. J. & Liu, Z. H., 2005. "Single machine scheduling to minimize total weighted tardiness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 423-443, September.
    10. Dvir Shabtay & George Steiner, 2008. "The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 25-40, March.
    11. Koulamas, Christos & Gupta, Sushil & Kyparisis, George J., 2010. "A unified analysis for the single-machine scheduling problem with controllable and non-controllable variable job processing times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 479-482, September.
    12. Hui Zhu & Min Li & Zhangjin Zhou & Yun You, 2016. "Due-window assignment and scheduling with general position-dependent processing times involving a deteriorating and compressible maintenance activity," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(12), pages 3475-3490, June.
    13. Wenchang Luo & Yao Xu & Weitian Tong & Guohui Lin, 2019. "Single-machine scheduling with job-dependent machine deterioration," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 691-707, December.
    14. Koulamas, Christos & Kyparisis, George J., 2023. "A classification of dynamic programming formulations for offline deterministic single-machine scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 999-1017.
    15. Rustogi, Kabir & Strusevich, Vitaly A., 2012. "Single machine scheduling with general positional deterioration and rate-modifying maintenance," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 791-804.
    16. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    17. Xu, Dehua & Wan, Long & Liu, Aihua & Yang, Dar-Li, 2015. "Single machine total completion time scheduling problem with workload-dependent maintenance duration," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 101-106.
    18. Norelhouda Sekkal & Fayçal Belkaid, 0. "A multi-objective simulated annealing to solve an identical parallel machine scheduling problem with deterioration effect and resources consumption constraints," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-37.
    19. Lu Liu & Jian-Jun Wang & Xiao-Yuan Wang, 2016. "Single machine due-window assignment scheduling with resource-dependent processing times to minimise total resource consumption cost," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 1186-1195, February.
    20. Biskup, Dirk, 1999. "Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 173-178, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:135:y:2012:i:1:p:222-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.