IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v128y2010i1p136-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand

Author

Listed:
  • Mula, Josefa
  • Peidro, David
  • Poler, Raul

Abstract

The main focus of this work is to prove the effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach to model a supply chain production planning problem with uncertainty in demand. A fuzzy optimization model that takes into account the lack of knowledge in market demand is developed. This work uses an approach of possibilistic programming. Such an approach makes it possible to model the epistemic uncertainty in demand that could be present in the supply chain production planning problems as triangular fuzzy numbers. The emphasis is on obtaining more knowledge about the impact of fuzzy programming on supply chain planning problems with uncertain demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Mula, Josefa & Peidro, David & Poler, Raul, 2010. "The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 136-143, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:128:y:2010:i:1:p:136-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(10)00215-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Vasant, Pandian M. & Barsoum, Nader N. & Bhattacharya, Arijit, 2008. "Possibilistic optimization in planning decision of construction industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 664-675, February.
    3. Mula, Josefa & Peidro, David & Díaz-Madroñero, Manuel & Vicens, Eduardo, 2010. "Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 377-390, August.
    4. J. Mula & R. Poler & J. P. Garcia-Sabater, 2008. "Capacity and material requirement planning modelling by comparing deterministic and fuzzy models," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(20), pages 5589-5606, January.
    5. V. Sridharan & William L. Berry & V. Udayabhanu, 1987. "Freezing the Master Production Schedule Under Rolling Planning Horizons," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1137-1149, September.
    6. Jimenez, Mariano & Arenas, Mar & Bilbao, Amelia & Rodri'guez, M. Victoria, 2007. "Linear programming with fuzzy parameters: An interactive method resolution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1599-1609, March.
    7. de Kok, Ton & Inderfurth, Karl, 1997. "Nervousness in inventory management: Comparison of basic control rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 55-82, November.
    8. van Donselaar, K. & van den Nieuwenhof, J. & Visschers, J., 2000. "The impact of material coordination concepts on planning stability in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 169-176, November.
    9. Wang, Reay-Chen & Fang, Hsiao-Hua, 2001. "Aggregate production planning with multiple objectives in a fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(3), pages 521-536, September.
    10. Inuiguchi, Masahiro & Sakawa, Masatoshi & Kume, Yasufumi, 1994. "The usefulness of possibilistic programming in production planning problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1-3), pages 45-52, January.
    11. Wang, Reay-Chen & Liang, Tien-Fu, 2005. "Applying possibilistic linear programming to aggregate production planning," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 328-341, December.
    12. Sodhi, ManMohan S. & Tang, Christopher S., 2009. "Modeling supply-chain planning under demand uncertainty using stochastic programming: A survey motivated by asset-liability management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 728-738, October.
    13. Mula, J. & Poler, R. & Garcia-Sabater, J.P. & Lario, F.C., 2006. "Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 271-285, September.
    14. Escudero, L. F., 1994. "CMIT, capacitated multi-level implosion tool," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 511-528, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou, Y. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H., 2015. "Planning sustainable electric-power system with carbon emission abatement through CDM under uncertainty," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 350-364.
    2. Mohd Fahmi Bin Mad Ali & Mohd Khairol Anuar Bin Mohd Ariffin & Faizal Bin Mustapha & Eris Elianddy Bin Supeni, 2021. "An Unsupervised Machine Learning-Based Framework for Transferring Local Factories into Supply Chain Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-31, December.
    3. Lau, Kwok Hung, 2013. "Measuring distribution efficiency of a retail network through data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 598-611.
    4. Xinbo Zhang & Feng Zhang & Xiaohong Chen & Zhong Wan, 2014. "Polymorphic Uncertain Linear Programming for Generalized Production Planning Problems," Journal of Optimization, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-10, February.
    5. Cunico, Maria Laura & Flores, Julio Rolando & Vecchietti, Aldo, 2017. "Investment in the energy sector: An optimization model that contemplates several uncertain parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 831-845.
    6. Dinler, Esra & Güngör, Zülal, 2017. "Planning decisions for recycling products containing hazardous and explosive substances: A fuzzy multi-objective model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 117(PB), pages 93-101.
    7. Yan Sun & Xinya Li & Xia Liang & Cevin Zhang, 2019. "A Bi-Objective Fuzzy Credibilistic Chance-Constrained Programming Approach for the Hazardous Materials Road-Rail Multimodal Routing Problem under Uncertainty and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Mohd Fahmi Bin Mad Ali & Mohd Khairol Anuar Bin Mohd Ariffin & Aidin Delgoshaei & Faizal Bin Mustapha & Eris Elianddy Bin Supeni, 2023. "A Comprehensive 3-Phase Framework for Determining the Customer’s Product Usage in a Food Supply Chain," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula & Mariano Jiménez & David Peidro, 2017. "A rolling horizon approach for material requirement planning under fuzzy lead times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2197-2211, April.
    10. Yan Sun & Xinya Li, 2019. "Fuzzy Programming Approaches for Modeling a Customer-Centred Freight Routing Problem in the Road-Rail Intermodal Hub-and-Spoke Network with Fuzzy Soft Time Windows and Multiple Sources of Time Uncerta," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-40, August.
    11. R. Uthayakumar & B. Karthick, 2023. "Analysis of several reduction strategies on a two-echelon sustainable supply chain model with triangular fuzzy demand," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 60(1), pages 393-419, March.
    12. Masoud Alinezhad & Iraj Mahdavi & Milad Hematian & Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, 2022. "A fuzzy multi-objective optimization model for sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design in food industries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8779-8806, June.
    13. Yan Sun & Yue Lu & Cevin Zhang, 2019. "Fuzzy Linear Programming Models for a Green Logistics Center Location and Allocation Problem under Mixed Uncertainties Based on Different Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Changyu Zhou & Guohe Huang & Jiapei Chen, 2018. "A Multi-Objective Energy and Environmental Systems Planning Model: Management of Uncertainties and Risks for Shanxi Province, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peidro, David & Mula, Josefa & Jiménez, Mariano & del Mar Botella, Ma, 2010. "A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 65-80, August.
    2. Demirel, Edil & Özelkan, Ertunga C. & Lim, Churlzu, 2018. "Aggregate planning with Flexibility Requirements Profile," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 45-58.
    3. Mula, J. & Poler, R. & Garcia-Sabater, J.P. & Lario, F.C., 2006. "Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 271-285, September.
    4. Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula & Mariano Jiménez & David Peidro, 2017. "A rolling horizon approach for material requirement planning under fuzzy lead times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2197-2211, April.
    5. Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
    6. Figueroa–García, Juan Carlos & Hernández, Germán & Franco, Carlos, 2022. "A review on history, trends and perspectives of fuzzy linear programming," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    7. Yasser A. Davizón & César Martínez-Olvera & Rogelio Soto & Carlos Hinojosa & Piero Espino-Román, 2015. "Optimal Control Approaches to the Aggregate Production Planning Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Shih-Pin Chen & Wen-Lung Huang, 2014. "Solving Fuzzy Multiproduct Aggregate Production Planning Problems Based on Extension Principle," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-18, August.
    9. Pereira, Daniel Filipe & Oliveira, José Fernando & Carravilla, Maria Antónia, 2020. "Tactical sales and operations planning: A holistic framework and a literature review of decision-making models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    10. SakallI, Ümit Sami & Baykoç, Ömer Faruk, 2011. "An optimization approach for brass casting blending problem under aletory and epistemic uncertainties," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 708-718, October.
    11. Laurent Lim, Lâm & Alpan, Gülgün & Penz, Bernard, 2014. "Reconciling sales and operations management with distant suppliers in the automotive industry: A simulation approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 20-36.
    12. Yong Zeng & Yanpeng Cai & Guohe Huang & Jing Dai, 2011. "A Review on Optimization Modeling of Energy Systems Planning and GHG Emission Mitigation under Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(10), pages 1-33, October.
    13. Meixell, Mary J., 2005. "The impact of setup costs, commonality, and capacity on schedule stability: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 95-107, January.
    14. João Flávio de Freitas Almeida & Samuel Vieira Conceição & Luiz Ricardo Pinto & Ricardo Saraiva de Camargo & Gilberto de Miranda Júnior, 2018. "Flexibility evaluation of multiechelon supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-27, March.
    15. Mike Spiliotis & Dionissis Latinopoulos & Lampros Vasiliades & Kyriakos Rafailidis & Eleni Koutsokera & Ifigenia Kagalou, 2022. "Flexible Goal Programming for Supporting Lake Karla’s (Greece) Sustainable Operation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, April.
    16. Carlos Herrera & Sana Belmokhtar-Berraf & André Thomas & Víctor Parada, 2016. "A reactive decision-making approach to reduce instability in a master production schedule," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2394-2404, April.
    17. Chia-Nan Wang & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Tran Quynh Le & Panitan Kewcharoenwong, 2020. "Transportation Optimization Models for Intermodal Networks with Fuzzy Node Capacity, Detour Factor, and Vehicle Utilization Constraints," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-27, November.
    18. Niu, G. & Li, Y.P. & Huang, G.H. & Liu, J. & Fan, Y.R., 2016. "Crop planning and water resource allocation for sustainable development of an irrigation region in China under multiple uncertainties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 53-69.
    19. Houda Ghamlouch & Mitra Fouladirad & Antoine Grall, 2019. "The use of real option in condition-based maintenance scheduling for wind turbines with production and deterioration uncertainties," Post-Print hal-02365402, HAL.
    20. Patoghi, Amirhosein & Mousavi, Seyed Meysam, 2021. "A new approach for material ordering and multi-mode resource constraint project scheduling problem in a multi-site context under interval-valued fuzzy uncertainty," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:128:y:2010:i:1:p:136-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.