IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v119y2022ics026483772200240x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Smoothing down arbitrariness in planning: From SWOT to participatory decision making

Author

Listed:
  • Stacchini, Annalisa
  • Guizzardi, Andrea
  • Mariotti, Alessia

Abstract

SWOT analyses are frequently employed in land use planning, the literature proposes improved versions for reducing decision-making arbitrariness, however some drawbacks remain. The purpose of this paper is to design the methodological steps of participatory land use planning through a three-fold SWOT, yielding a strategy that is both feasible and in line with the residents’ vision. First, residents are interviewed with open-ended questions permitting them to freely express their ideas. Institutional players are involved next, through a modified Nominal Group Technique. Prioritization of factors is reached through an automatic algorithm that synthesizes the opinions of residents and institutional players, while avoiding the compensation between low scores for some criteria and high scores for others, so that the community’s view is not overpowered. The prioritization is also based on the interconnection between factors, to ensure feasibility of the strategy indicated. The results of our illustrative application show that this method can lead to community-based entrepreneurial land use. Unexpectedly, in the small area considered, institutional players place greater consideration on the development perspective of local businesses, compared to residents, who display a greater environmental consciousness and commitment to biodiversity conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacchini, Annalisa & Guizzardi, Andrea & Mariotti, Alessia, 2022. "Smoothing down arbitrariness in planning: From SWOT to participatory decision making," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:119:y:2022:i:c:s026483772200240x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772200240X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Jen-Hung & Peng, Kua-Hsin, 2012. "Fuzzy Rasch model in TOPSIS: A new approach for generating fuzzy numbers to assess the competitiveness of the tourism industries in Asian countries," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 456-465.
    2. Alexander, K.A. & Ramotadima, M. & Sanderson, Claire E., 2018. "The power of consensus: Developing a community voice in land use planning and tourism development in biodiversity hotspots," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(PC), pages 350-361.
    3. Bungon Sawatsuk & I Gede Darmawijaya & Sirikiet Ratchusanti & Ariya Phaokrueng, 2018. "Factors Determining the Sustainable Success of Community-BasedTourism: Evidence of Good Corporate Governance of Mae Kam PongHomestay, Thailand," International Journal of Business and Economic Affairs (IJBEA), Sana N. Maswadeh, vol. 3(1), pages 13-20.
    4. Starr, Morgan & Joshi, Omkar & Will, Rodney E. & Zou, Chris B., 2019. "Perceptions regarding active management of the Cross-timbers forest resources of Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas: A SWOT-ANP analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 523-530.
    5. Antonakakis, Nikolaos & Dragouni, Mina & Filis, George, 2015. "How strong is the linkage between tourism and economic growth in Europe?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 142-155.
    6. Almeida, Joana & Costa, Carlos & Nunes da Silva, Fernando, 2018. "Collaborative approach for tourism conflict management: A Portuguese case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 166-179.
    7. Kazemi, Fatemeh & Abolhassani, Leili & Rahmati, Elahe Azam & Sayyad-Amin, Pegah, 2018. "Strategic planning for cultivation of fruit trees and shrubs in urban landscapes using the SWOT method: A case study for the city of Mashhad, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-9.
    8. Coria, Jessica & Calfucura, Enrique, 2012. "Ecotourism and the development of indigenous communities: The good, the bad, and the ugly," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 47-55.
    9. Sisto, Roberta & Lopolito, Antonio & van Vliet, Mathijs, 2018. "Stakeholder participation in planning rural development strategies: Using backcasting to support Local Action Groups in complying with CLLD requirements," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 442-450.
    10. Kertész, Ádám & Nagy, Loránd Attila & Balázs, Boglárka, 2019. "Effect of land use change on ecosystem services in Lake Balaton Catchment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 430-438.
    11. Odysseas Moschidis & Vasileios Ismyrlis, 2018. "Citizens' Participation in Local Economic Development and Administration: An Exploratory Statistical Analysis," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 16(1), pages 35-54.
    12. Iandolo, Francesca & Fulco, Irene & Bassano, Clara & D’Amore, Raffaele, 2019. "Managing a tourism destination as a viable complex system. The case of Arbatax Park," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 21-30.
    13. Stefano Duglio & Alessandro Bonadonna & Marilisa Letey & Giovanni Peira & Laura Zavattaro & Giampiero Lombardi, 2019. "Tourism Development in Inner Mountain Areas—The Local Stakeholders’ Point of View through a Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Jia Wang & Zhifeng Wang, 2020. "Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) Analysis of China’s Prevention and Control Strategy for the COVID-19 Epidemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Ting Fan & Dong Qian Xue, 2018. "Sustainable Development of Cultural Industry in Shaanxi Province of Northwest China: A SWOT and AHP Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Karimi, Azadeh & Adams, Vanessa M., 2019. "Planning for the future: Combining spatially-explicit public preferences with tenure policies to support land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 497-508.
    17. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Živković, Živan, 2017. "Hybrid SWOT - ANP - FANP model for prioritization strategies of sustainable development of ecotourism in National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 11-26.
    18. Salvatore Greco & Alessio Ishizaka & Menelaos Tasiou & Gianpiero Torrisi, 2019. "On the Methodological Framework of Composite Indices: A Review of the Issues of Weighting, Aggregation, and Robustness," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 61-94, January.
    19. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Mihajlović, Ivan & Fedajev, Aleksandra & Živković, Živan, 2018. "A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 85-95.
    20. Van de Ven, A.H. & Delbecq, A.L., 1972. "The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 62(3), pages 337-342.
    21. Dennis L Buchanan & Mark H. A. Davis, 2018. "Strategic Management," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Metals and Energy Finance Application of Quantitative Finance Techniques to the Evaluation of Minerals, Coal and Petroleum Projects, chapter 3, pages 39-65, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    22. Cucari, Nicola & Wankowicz, Ewa & Esposito De Falco, Salvatore, 2019. "Rural tourism and Albergo Diffuso: A case study for sustainable land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 105-119.
    23. Sharpley, Richard, 2014. "Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 37-49.
    24. Spencer, Daniel M., 2010. "Facilitating public participation in tourism planning on American Indian reservations: A case study involving the Nominal Group Technique," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 684-690.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aftabi, Pegah & Bahramjerdi, Somayeh Fadaei Nezhad, 2023. "Developing a decision-making framework within the management of historical cities: Towards integrated conservation and development of the Roudaki neighbourhood," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. Margherita Pazzini & Rachele Corticelli & Claudio Lantieri & Cecilia Mazzoli, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Analysis and Decision-Making Approach for the Urban Regeneration: The Application to the Rimini Canal Port (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Palazzo, Maria & Vollero, Agostino & Vitale, Pierluigi & Siano, Alfonso, 2021. "Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: Exploring the influencers’ role in #sustainabletourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    2. Rêgo, Carmo Sousa & Almeida, Joana, 2022. "A framework to analyse conflicts between residents and tourists: The case of a historic neighbourhood in Lisbon, Portugal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Lishan Xu & Changlin Ao & Baoqi Liu & Zhenyu Cai, 2023. "Ecotourism and sustainable development: a scientometric review of global research trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 2977-3003, April.
    4. Xia Wang & Danli Liu, 2020. "The Coupling Coordination Relationship between Tourism Competitiveness and Economic Growth of Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Hayati, Mohammad & Mahdevari, Satar & Barani, Kianoush, 2023. "An improved MADM-based SWOT analysis for strategic planning in dimension stones industry," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Parvaneh Sobhani & Hassan Esmaeilzadeh & Isabelle D. Wolf & Marina Viorela Marcu & Michael Lück & Seyed Mohammad Moein Sadeghi, 2023. "Strategies to Manage Ecotourism Sustainably: Insights from a SWOT-ANP Analysis and IUCN Guidelines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-23, July.
    7. Margherita Pazzini & Rachele Corticelli & Claudio Lantieri & Cecilia Mazzoli, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Analysis and Decision-Making Approach for the Urban Regeneration: The Application to the Rimini Canal Port (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-28, December.
    8. José Ramón-Cardona & María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández, 2022. "Innovation and Strategic Management for the Development of Tourist Destinations: Development of Nightlife and Residents’ Attitudes in Punta del Este (Uruguay)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Jamali, Narjes & Feylizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Liu, Peide, 2021. "Prioritization of aircraft maintenance unit strategies using fuzzy Analytic Network Process: A case study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Moayad Mohammad Alrwajfah & Fernando Almeida-García & Rafael Cortés-Macías, 2019. "Residents’ Perceptions and Satisfaction toward Tourism Development: A Case Study of Petra Region, Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Arsić, Sanela & Nikolić, Djordje & Mihajlović, Ivan & Fedajev, Aleksandra & Živković, Živan, 2018. "A New Approach Within ANP-SWOT Framework for Prioritization of Ecosystem Management and Case Study of National Park Djerdap, Serbia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 85-95.
    12. Wilawan Jansri, 2019. "Perception of Residents, Community Participation and Support for Tourism Development in the Old Town Muang Songkhla, Thailand," Proceedings of the 13th International RAIS Conference, June 10-11, 2019 07WJ, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
    13. Mariateresa Ciommi & Chiara Gigliarano & Francesco M. Chelli & Mauro Gallegati, 2022. "It is the Total that Does [Not] Make the Sum: Nature, Economy and Society in the Equitable and Sustainable Well-Being of the Italian Provinces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 161(2), pages 491-522, June.
    14. Nazifa Rafa & Samiha Nuzhat & Sayed Mohammad Nazim Uddin & Mukesh Gupta & Rahul Rakshit, 2021. "Ecotourism as a Forest Conservation Tool: An NDVI Analysis of the Sitakunda Botanical Garden and Ecopark in Chattogram, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Rajko Tomaš, 2022. "Measurement of the Concentration of Potential Quality of Life in Local Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 79-109, August.
    16. Salvatore Bimonte & Antonella D’Agostino, 2021. "Tourism development and residents’ well-being: Comparing two seaside destinations in Italy," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1508-1525, November.
    17. Greco, Salvatore & Ishizaka, Alessio & Tasiou, Menelaos & Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2018. "σ-µ efficiency analysis: A new methodology for evaluating units through composite indices," MPRA Paper 83569, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Adriana Csikosova & Katarina Culkova & Erik Weiss & Maria Janoskova, 2021. "Evaluation of Market with Accommodation Facilities Considering Risk Influence—Case Study Slovakia," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Jelena DURKIN BADURINA & Daniela SOLDIC FRLETA & Larry DWYER, 2022. "Meet Sceptics, Neutrals And Believers: An Alternative Approach To Analysing Residents’ Attitudes Towards Tourism In Urban Destinations," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 24-44, February.
    20. Fusco, Elisa, 2023. "Potential improvements approach in composite indicators construction: The Multi-directional Benefit of the Doubt model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:119:y:2022:i:c:s026483772200240x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.