IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v107y2021ics0264837721001794.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new quality management system of admittance indicators to improve industrial land use efficiency in the Beijing−Tianjin−Hebei region

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Yingying
  • Zhou, Dingyang
  • Jiang, Guanghui

Abstract

Given China’s rapid urbanization, the continual adjustment of industrial land admittance indicators (ILAIs) to promote the optimal allocation and utilization of industrial land is critical for urban land use optimization and sustainable urban development. Unlike previous studies that have focused on qualitative analysis and traditional economic and statistical methods to modify ILAIs via sample survey data, this paper proposes a new theoretical framework for determining the optimal regulation of ILAIs to improve land use efficiency from a quality management perspective, analyses the differences in ILAIs in industrial space and types at multiple scales and sets and modifies the diverse function values of ILAIs by sub-region and sub-industrial sector via a probability model based on big data for 2007–2016 for the Beijing−Tianjin−Hebei (BTH) region. The findings were as follows: (1) The floor area ratio (FAR), greening ratio (GR), building density (BD) and fixed asset investment intensity (FAII) of industrial land in BTH were found to be low within national standards and exhibited great excavation potential. (2) The ILAIs exhibited spatial heterogeneity, with a significant multicore circular structure of peaks and fluctuations and with FAR, BD and FAII values higher in the Jing-Jin region and in the southern and northeastern regions of Hebei Province but lower in northwestern BTH, while the GR’s spatial pattern showed the opposite trend. (3) Both the five classified sub-regions and industry sub-types displayed marked variations in ILAIs, indicating that it was necessary to modify ILAIs by sub-region and sub-industrial sector. (4) Industrial land use efficiency in BTH was further revealed at the general, non-intensive and extensive levels and was found to vary considerable by sub-type. The land use mode of the service industry was the most efficient and intensive, followed by that of the high-tech industry. The land intensiveness of various light industry sectors was clearly distinct, while the chemical, metallurgy and equipment manufacturing industries were of moderate to non-intensive levels. The lowest values were found for the mining and coking industry. (5) The probability model is suggested to be an effective method for modifying the multifunctional values of ILAIs. Relative to national standards, the improved control values of ILAIs were higher at the regional level, and for different sub-regions not fully proportional to their development levels, they were higher or lower than their regional counterparts, even deviating from national standards. The revised FAR of each industry was also found to be higher and directly proportional to existing national standards; however, their improvement exhibited the opposite trend. ILAIs performance was bifurcated in terms of industry sub-types and economic-geographic regions. This study suggests establishing twofold ILAIs of “land use efficiency and industrial development”, developing gradient path guidance for ILAIs threshold values and enhancing ILAIs implementation flexibility to realize the precise matching of industry transfer and acceptance and the coordinated and balanced development of the entire region and constructing a sound “access-adjustment-exit” circulation system for applying ILAIs throughout the life cycle of industrial land.

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Yingying & Zhou, Dingyang & Jiang, Guanghui, 2021. "A new quality management system of admittance indicators to improve industrial land use efficiency in the Beijing−Tianjin−Hebei region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:107:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001794
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837721001794
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105456?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xie, Hualin & Chen, Qianru & Lu, Fucai & Wu, Qing & Wang, Wei, 2018. "Spatial-temporal disparities, saving potential and influential factors of industrial land use efficiency: A case study in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 518-529.
    2. Gao, Jinlong & Chen, Wen & Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Spatial restructuring and the logic of industrial land redevelopment in urban China: II. A case study of the redevelopment of a local state-owned enterprise in Nanjing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 372-380.
    3. Zheng, Dan & Shi, Minjun, 2018. "Industrial land policy, firm heterogeneity and firm location choice: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 58-67.
    4. Joshi, Kirti Kusum & Kono, Tatsuhito, 2009. "Optimization of floor area ratio regulation in a growing city," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 502-511, July.
    5. Brent W. Ambrose, 1990. "An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Light Industrial Property Valuation," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 5(3), pages 355-370.
    6. Ciccone, Antonio & Hall, Robert E, 1996. "Productivity and the Density of Economic Activity," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(1), pages 54-70, March.
    7. Michael P Johnson, 2001. "Environmental Impacts of Urban Sprawl: A Survey of the Literature and Proposed Research Agenda," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 33(4), pages 717-735, April.
    8. Zhou, Lin & Tian, Li & Gao, Yuan & Ling, Yingkai & Fan, Chenjing & Hou, Deyi & Shen, Tiyan & Zhou, Wentong, 2019. "How did industrial land supply respond to transitions in state strategy? An analysis of prefecture-level cities in China from 2007 to 2016," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    9. Tatsuhito Kono & Takayuki Kaneko & Hisa Morisugi, 2010. "Necessity of minimum floor area ratio regulation: a second-best policy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 44(3), pages 523-539, June.
    10. Liu, Yansui, 2018. "Introduction to land use and rural sustainability in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-4.
    11. Zhou, Yang & Guo, Liying & Liu, Yansui, 2019. "Land consolidation boosting poverty alleviation in China: Theory and practice," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 339-348.
    12. Erik Louw & Yvonne Bontekoning, 2007. "Planning Of Industrial Land In The Netherlands: Its Rationales And Consequences," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(1), pages 121-129, February.
    13. Arnott, Richard J. & MacKinnon, James G., 1977. "Measuring the costs of height restrictions with a general equilibrium model," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 359-375, November.
    14. Giulio Cainelli & Donato Iacobucci & Enrica Morganti, 2006. "Spatial agglomeration and business groups: New evidence from Italian industrial districts," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 507-518.
    15. Ara, Kenjiro, 1961. "Labor, Capital and Land in Economic Growth," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 2(1), pages 26-41, September.
    16. Yang, Yuanyuan & Liu, Yansui & Li, Yurui & Li, Jintao, 2018. "Measure of urban-rural transformation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in the new millennium: Population-land-industry perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 595-608.
    17. Cheng, Mingyang & Yansui Liu, & Zhou, Yang, 2019. "Measuring the symbiotic development of rural housing and industry: A case study of Fuping County in the Taihang Mountains in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 307-316.
    18. Jinu Kim, 1998. "Industrial Rents and Land Values in the Sydney Property Market," International Real Estate Review, Global Social Science Institute, vol. 1(1), pages 150-160.
    19. Chen, Wei & Shen, Yue & Wang, Yanan & Wu, Qun, 2018. "How do industrial land price variations affect industrial diffusion? Evidence from a spatial analysis of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 384-394.
    20. Li Fang & Chuanhao Tian & Xiaohong Yin & Yan Song, 2018. "Political Cycles and the Mix of Industrial and Residential Land Leasing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, August.
    21. Bertaud, Alain & Brueckner, Jan K., 2005. "Analyzing building-height restrictions: predicted impacts and welfare costs," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 109-125, March.
    22. Ann Hodgkinson & Chris Nyland & Simon Pomfret, 2001. "The Determination of Location in New South Wales," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 39-55.
    23. Larry J. Lockwood & Ronald C. Rutherford, 1996. "Determinants of Industrial Property Value," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 257-272.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ning Wang & Zhigang Chen & Tianshu Li & Mengjia Zhen, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Pattern Evolution and Influence Mechanism of Urban Vertical Expansion: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Congguo Zhang & Di Yao & Yanlin Zhen & Weiwei Li & Kerun Li, 2022. "Mismatched Relationship between Urban Industrial Land Consumption and Growth of Manufacturing: Evidence from the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-35, August.
    3. Naifu Yu & Yingkai Tang & Ying Ma, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution, Spillover Effects of Land Resource Use Efficiency in Urban Built-Up Area: A Further Analysis Based on Economic Agglomeration," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Yanqi Zhao & Yue Zhang & Ying Yang & Fan Li & Rongkun Dai & Jianlin Li & Mingshi Wang & Zhenhua Li, 2023. "The Impact of Land Use Structure Change on Utilization Performance in Henan Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Gao, Fugang & Ma, Xianlei & van der Krabben, Erwin & Ploegmakers, Huub & Shi, Xiaoping, 2022. "Causes of industrial land-use regulations in China: A share tenancy perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    6. Yao Luo & Chen Li & Junjun Zhi & Qun Wu & Jiajing Yao, 2022. "Policy Innovation of Life Cycle Management of Industrial Land Supply in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Jian & Wu, Qun & Yan, Siqi & Guo, Guancheng & Peng, Shangui, 2020. "China’s local governments breaking the land use planning quota: A strategic interaction perspective," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Shu, Hui & Xiong, Ping-ping, 2019. "Reallocation planning of urban industrial land for structure optimization and emission reduction: A practical analysis of urban agglomeration in China’s Yangtze River Delta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 604-623.
    3. Tikoudis, Ioannis & Verhoef, Erik T. & van Ommeren, Jos N., 2018. "Second-best urban tolls in a monocentric city with housing market regulations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 342-359.
    4. Zeng, Zhaozhao & Song, Bingjie & Zheng, Xiaodong & Li, Huan, 2019. "Changes of traffic network and urban transformation: A case study of Xi’an city, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    5. Lu, Shasha & Zhou, Yi & Sun, Haisheng & Chen, Ni & Guan, Xingliang, 2021. "Examining the influencing factors of forest health, its implications on rural revitalization: A case study of five forest farms in Beijing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Cai, Zhaoyang & Liu, Qing & Cao, Shixiong, 2020. "Real estate supports rapid development of China's urbanization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    7. Kono, Tatsuhito & Joshi, Kirti Kusum & Kato, Takeaki & Yokoi, Takahisa, 2012. "Optimal regulation on building size and city boundary: An effective second-best remedy for traffic congestion externality," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 619-630.
    8. Wang, Cheng & Wang, Gang & Guo, Ziru & Dai, Lingjun & Liu, Hongyu & Li, Yufeng & Chen, Hao & Zhao, Yongxiang & Zhang, Yanan & Cheng, Hai, 2020. "Effects of land-use change on the distribution of the wintering red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis) in the coastal area of northern Jiangsu Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Yidi Wang & Ying Fan & Zan Yang, 2022. "Challenges, Experience, and Prospects of Urban Renewal in High-Density Cities: A Review for Hong Kong," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Lu, Xinhai & Li, Yan & Ke, Shangan, 2020. "Spatial distribution pattern and its optimization strategy of China’s overseas farmland investments," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Wen, Yangyang & Zhang, Zhengfeng & Liang, Di & Xu, Ze, 2020. "Rural Residential Land Transition in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region: Spatial-Temporal Patterns and Policy Implications," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    12. Zhou, Qian & Shao, Qinglong & Zhang, Xiaoling & Chen, Jie, 2020. "Do housing prices promote total factor productivity? Evidence from spatial panel data models in explaining the mediating role of population density," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    13. Gao, Yang & Liu, Bei & Yu, Lili & Yang, Haoran & Yin, Shijiu, 2019. "Social capital, land tenure and the adoption of green control techniques by family farms: Evidence from Shandong and Henan Provinces of China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Yao, Yongling & Pan, Haozhi & Cui, Xiaoyu & Wang, Zhen, 2022. "Do compact cities have higher efficiencies of agglomeration economies? A dynamic panel model with compactness indicators," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    15. Zhang, Ling & Zhang, Lei & Xu, Yan & Zhou, Peng & Yeh, Chung-Hsing, 2020. "Evaluating urban land use efficiency with interacting criteria: An empirical study of cities in Jiangsu China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    16. Ye, Sijing & Song, Changqing & Shen, Shi & Gao, Peichao & Cheng, Changxiu & Cheng, Feng & Wan, Changjun & Zhu, Dehai, 2020. "Spatial pattern of arable land-use intensity in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    17. Lü, Da & Gao, Guangyao & Lü, Yihe & Xiao, Feiyan & Fu, Bojie, 2020. "Detailed land use transition quantification matters for smart land management in drylands: An in-depth analysis in Northwest China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    18. Chenxi Li & Xing Gao & Bao-Jie He & Jingyao Wu & Kening Wu, 2019. "Coupling Coordination Relationships between Urban-industrial Land Use Efficiency and Accessibility of Highway Networks: Evidence from Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, March.
    19. Yue, Wenze & Wang, Tianyu & Liu, Yong & Zhang, Qun & Ye, Xinyue, 2019. "Mismatch of morphological and functional polycentricity in Chinese cities: An evidence from land development and functional linkage," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Dai, Bing & Gu, Xiaokun & Xie, Boming, 2020. "Policy Framework and Mechanism of Life Cycle Management of Industrial Land (LCMIL) in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:107:y:2021:i:c:s0264837721001794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.