IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v78y2022ics0301420722003968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting the optimal exploitation option using a digital deposit model and the AHP

Author

Listed:
  • Sobczyk, Eugeniusz J.
  • Galica, Dominik
  • Kopacz, Michał
  • Sobczyk, Wiktoria

Abstract

The prime objective of the study was to identify and evaluate options for development and exploitation of a prospective hard coal deposit using a digital geological model and a multi-criteria decision-making approach allowed, in elaborated research process, to identify investment alternatives and outline the one that maximizes the benefits for the potential investor. The developed research methodology was based on decision criteria including: economic, technical, geological, social, and environmental aspects. The combination of the above criteria made it possible to create six options for the development of the deposit named as: 1.2 MAX and 1.2 EKO, 1.5 MAX and 1.5 EKO, and 1.8 MAX and 1.8 EKO. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used as a method to select the optimum investment option. The research process consisted in taking into account the positive and negative impacts of individual exploitation options by building four separate hierarchical models (BOCR analysis), i.e. Benefits (B), Opportunities (O), Costs (C) and Risks (R).

Suggested Citation

  • Sobczyk, Eugeniusz J. & Galica, Dominik & Kopacz, Michał & Sobczyk, Wiktoria, 2022. "Selecting the optimal exploitation option using a digital deposit model and the AHP," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:78:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722003968
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722003968
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F Samimi Namin & K Shahriar & A Bascetin & S H Ghodsypour, 2012. "FMMSIC: a hybrid fuzzy based decision support system for MMS (in order to estimate interrelationships between criteria)," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 63(2), pages 218-231, February.
    2. Radwanek-Bąk, Barbara & Sobczyk, Wiktoria & Sobczyk, Eugeniusz J., 2020. "Support for multiple criteria decisions for mineral deposits valorization and protection," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Pohekar, S. D. & Ramachandran, M., 2004. "Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 365-381, August.
    5. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    6. Kopacz, Michał & Kulpa, Jarosław & Galica, Dominik & Olczak, Piotr, 2020. "The influence of variability models for selected geological parameters on the resource base and economic efficiency measures - Example of coking coal deposit," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Kopacz, Michał & Sobczyk, Eugeniusz J. & Galica, Dominik, 2018. "The impact of variability and correlation of selected geological parameters on the economic assessment of bituminous coal deposits with use of non-parametric bootstrap and copula-based Monte Carlo sim," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 171-183.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andersen, Steffen & Harrison, Glenn W. & Lau, Morten Igel & Rutström, Elisabet E., 2014. "Dual criteria decisions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 101-113.
      • Andersen, Steffen & Harrison, Glenn W. & Lau, Morten Igel & Rutström, Elisabet, 2009. "Dual Criteria Decisions," Working Papers 02-2009, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Economics.
    2. Sobczyk, Eugeniusz J. & Kicki, Jerzy & Sobczyk, Wiktoria & Szuwarzyński, Marek, 2017. "Support of mining investment choice decisions with the use of multi-criteria method," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 94-99.
    3. Aertsen, Wim & Kint, Vincent & van Orshoven, Jos & Özkan, Kürşad & Muys, Bart, 2010. "Comparison and ranking of different modelling techniques for prediction of site index in Mediterranean mountain forests," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1119-1130.
    4. Lucas, Rochelle Irene & Promentilla, Michael Angelo & Ubando, Aristotle & Tan, Raymond Girard & Aviso, Kathleen & Yu, Krista Danielle, 2017. "An AHP-based evaluation method for teacher training workshop on information and communication technology," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 93-100.
    5. Alejandro Salado & Roshanak Nilchiani, 2014. "A Categorization Model of Requirements Based on Max‐Neef's Model of Human Needs," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 348-360, September.
    6. Stefan A. Hajkowicz, 2012. "For the Greater Good? A Test for Strategic Bias in Group Environmental Decisions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 331-344, May.
    7. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Güleryüz, Sezin, 2016. "An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 435-448.
    8. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    9. Vasileiou, Margarita & Loukogeorgaki, Eva & Vagiona, Dimitra G., 2017. "GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 745-757.
    10. Rahimdel, Mohammad Javad & Noferesti, Hossein, 2020. "Investment preferences of Iran's mineral extraction sector with a focus on the productivity of the energy consumption, water and labor force," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Clark Briggs & Patrick Little, 2008. "Impacts of Organizational Culture and Personality Traits on Decision‐making in Technical Organizations," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(1), pages 15-26, March.
    12. Virginia Racioppi & Gabriella Marcarelli & Massimo Squillante, 2015. "Modelling a sustainable requalification problem by analytic hierarchy process," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1661-1677, July.
    13. Guillaume, Romain & Houé, Raymond & Grabot, Bernard, 2014. "Robust competence assessment for job assignment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 630-644.
    14. Diaz-Balteiro, L & González-Pachón, J. & Romero, C., 2017. "Measuring systems sustainability with multi-criteria methods: A critical review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 607-616.
    15. Elena Carrara & Rebecca Ciavarella & Stefania Boglietti & Martina Carra & Giulio Maternini & Benedetto Barabino, 2021. "Identifying and Selecting Key Sustainable Parameters for the Monitoring of e-Powered Micro Personal Mobility Vehicles. Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Dalton Garcia Borges de Souza & Erivelton Antonio dos Santos & Nei Yoshihiro Soma & Carlos Eduardo Sanches da Silva, 2021. "MCDM-Based R&D Project Selection: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-34, October.
    17. Dinulescu Ruxandra & Dobrin Cosmin, 2022. "Applying the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for classifying and prioritizing healthcare quality attributes," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 15-40, March.
    18. Behnoosh Matani & Babak Shirazi & Javad Soltanzadeh, 2019. "F-MaMcDm: Sustainable Green-Based Hydrogen Production Technology Roadmap Using Fuzzy Multi-Aspect Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(08), pages 1-32, December.
    19. Mallikarjun, Sreekanth & Lewis, Herbert F., 2014. "Energy technology allocation for distributed energy resources: A strategic technology-policy framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 783-799.
    20. Luiz Flavio Autran Monteiro Gomes & Luís Alberto Duncan Rangel & Gisele Dos Santos, 2016. "An AHP-based asset allocation model," International Journal of Business and Systems Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 78-99.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:78:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722003968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.