IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v73y2021ics0301420721001811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of switch on-switch off (SOSO) mining: Human resource development tailored to technological solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Moore, K.R.
  • Moradi, S.
  • Doyle, K.
  • Sydd, O.
  • Amaral, V.
  • Bodin, J.
  • Brito-Parada, P.R.
  • Dudley, F.
  • Fitzpatrick, R.
  • Foster, P.
  • Goettmann, F.
  • Roberts, D.
  • Roethe, R.
  • Sairinen, R.
  • Sambrook, T.
  • Segura-Salazar, J.
  • Thomas, G.

Abstract

Adaptable, mobile, modularised technical solutions were piloted for switch on-switch off (SOSO) mining at test sites in the west Balkans. Pre-training occurred at the site of module construction and on the mine site in order to transfer knowledge relating to the rapid deployment, commissioning and operation of mining and processing units, in a mature health and safety culture. Translation of extensive documentation, describing operation of the equipment, into local languages and visual aids supported communication. Consideration of the activities required to deploy and operate prototype solutions revealed how characteristics of a SOSO workforce differed from other types of mining. Deployment of modularised plant employed fewer workers than traditional stick-build of a processing plant, but selective mining and processing of complex and variable deposits limited the potential for automation and required operator control. A workforce with mixed levels of experience was most amenable to development of a mature health and safety culture. The total number of employees was small at an individual site and might remain small, even in a multi-deposit, regional business model. However, employment is higher per unit of production than for conventional large-scale mining. The duration of employment is shorter than for large-scale mining but employment can nevertheless be important where there are few alternative opportunities and where it can increase the skills-base to support a more diversified local economy. SOSO mining constitutes a new relationship between society and the mining industry, which needs further consideration for greater resilience in the local community and increased social sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Moore, K.R. & Moradi, S. & Doyle, K. & Sydd, O. & Amaral, V. & Bodin, J. & Brito-Parada, P.R. & Dudley, F. & Fitzpatrick, R. & Foster, P. & Goettmann, F. & Roberts, D. & Roethe, R. & Sairinen, R. & Sa, 2021. "Sustainability of switch on-switch off (SOSO) mining: Human resource development tailored to technological solutions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:73:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721001811
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420721001811
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102167?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shandro, Janis A. & Veiga, Marcello M. & Shoveller, Jean & Scoble, Malcolm & Koehoorn, Mieke, 2011. "Perspectives on community health issues and the mining boom-bust cycle," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 178-186, June.
    2. Bradon Ellem, 2016. "Geographies of the labour process: automation and the spatiality of mining," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 30(6), pages 932-948, December.
    3. Lordan, Grace & Neumark, David, 2018. "People versus machines: The impact of minimum wages on automatable jobs," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 40-53.
    4. Marchand, Joseph, 2012. "Local labor market impacts of energy boom-bust-boom in Western Canada," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 165-174.
    5. Törmä, Hannu & Kujala, Susanna & Kinnunen, Jouko, 2015. "The employment and population impacts of the boom and bust of Talvivaara mine in the context of severe environmental accidents – A CGE evaluation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(P2), pages 127-138.
    6. Leeuw, Paseka & Mtegha, Hudson, 2018. "The significance of mining backward and forward linkages in reskilling redundant mine workers in South Africa," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 31-37.
    7. Melanie Arntz & Terry Gregory & Ulrich Zierahn, 2016. "The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 189, OECD Publishing.
    8. Sidorenko, Olga & Sairinen, Rauno & Moore, Kathryn, 2020. "Rethinking the concept of small-scale mining for technologically advanced raw materials production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    9. Holcombe, Sarah & Kemp, Deanna, 2019. "Indigenous peoples and mine automation: An issues paper," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Marais, Lochner & McKenzie, Fiona Haslam & Deacon, Leith & Nel, Etienne & Rooyen, Deidre van & Cloete, Jan, 2018. "The changing nature of mining towns: Reflections from Australia, Canada and South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 779-788.
    11. Bellamy, Drew & Pravica, Luka, 2011. "Assessing the impact of driverless haul trucks in Australian surface mining," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 149-158, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belloc, Filippo & Burdin, Gabriel & Cattani, Luca & Ellis, William & Landini, Fabio, 2022. "Coevolution of job automation risk and workplace governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    2. Thomas Moritz & Thomas Ejdemo & Patrik Söderholm & Linda Wårell, 2017. "The local employment impacts of mining: an econometric analysis of job multipliers in northern Sweden," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 30(1), pages 53-65, April.
    3. Fierro, Luca Eduardo & Caiani, Alessandro & Russo, Alberto, 2022. "Automation, Job Polarisation, and Structural Change," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 499-535.
    4. Josten, Cecily & Lordan, Grace, 2022. "Automation and the Changing Nature of Work," IZA Discussion Papers 15180, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Aragón, Fernando M. & Rud, Juan Pablo & Toews, Gerhard, 2018. "Resource shocks, employment, and gender: Evidence from the collapse of the UK coal industry," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 54-67.
    6. Raja Bentaouet Kattan & Kevin Macdonald & Harry Anthony Patrinos, 2021. "The Role of Education in Mitigating Automation’s Effect on Wage Inequality," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 35(1), pages 79-104, March.
    7. Van Assche, Kristof & Gruezmacher, Monica & Deacon, Leith, 2020. "Land use tools for tempering boom and bust: Strategy and capacity building in governance," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Bürgisser, Reto, 2023. "Policy Responses to Technological Change in the Workplace," SocArXiv kwxn2, Center for Open Science.
    9. Anderton, Robert & Jarvis, Valerie & Labhard, Vincent & Morgan, Julian & Petroulakis, Filippos & Vivian, Lara, 2020. "Virtually everywhere? Digitalisation and the euro area and EU economies," Occasional Paper Series 244, European Central Bank.
    10. Jiao, Wenting & Zhang, Xiaosen & Li, Changhong & Guo, Jiaqi, 2021. "Sustainable transition of mining cities in China: Literature review and policy analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Claude Paraponaris, 2017. "Plateformes numériques, conception ouverte et emploi," Post-Print halshs-01614430, HAL.
    12. Basso, Henrique S. & Jimeno, Juan F., 2021. "From secular stagnation to robocalypse? Implications of demographic and technological changes," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 833-847.
    13. Caroline Lloyd & Jonathan Payne, 2021. "Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 109-124, March.
    14. Lütkenhorst, Wilfried, 2018. "Creating wealth without labour? Emerging contours of a new techno-economic landscape," IDOS Discussion Papers 11/2018, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    15. Kivinen, Mari & Eilu, Pasi & Markovaara-Koivisto, Mira, 2021. "Mineral futures in land-use planning: Foresight tools and case studies in Northern Finland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Arntz, Melanie & Gregory, Terry & Lehmer, Florian & Matthes, Britta & Zierahn, Ulrich, 2016. "Arbeitswelt 4.0 - Stand der Digitalisierung in Deutschland: Dienstleister haben die Nase vorn (Current state of digitalisation in Germany : Service Providers are one step ahead)," IAB-Kurzbericht 201622, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    17. Stephan E. Maurer & Andrei V. Potlogea, 2021. "Male‐biased Demand Shocks and Women's Labour Force Participation: Evidence from Large Oil Field Discoveries," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(349), pages 167-188, January.
    18. Marianna Kudlyak & Murat Tasci & Didem Tuzemen, 2019. "Minimum Wage Increases and Vacancies," Working Papers 19-30R, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, revised 21 Apr 2022.
    19. Chan, Ying Tung & Zhao, Hong, 2023. "Optimal carbon tax rates in a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with a supply chain," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Dario Cords & Klaus Prettner, 2022. "Technological unemployment revisited: automation in a search and matching framework [The future of work: meeting the global challenges of demographic change and automation]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 115-135.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:73:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721001811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.