IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jobhdp/v82y2000i2p237-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing the Effects of Performance Expectations on Behavioral Ratings

Author

Listed:
  • Baltes, Boris B.
  • Parker, Christopher P.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Baltes, Boris B. & Parker, Christopher P., 2000. "Reducing the Effects of Performance Expectations on Behavioral Ratings," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 237-267, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:82:y:2000:i:2:p:237-267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749-5978(00)92897-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schleicher, Deidra J. & Day, David V., 1998. "A Cognitive Evaluation of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training: Content and Process Issues, ," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 76-101, January.
    2. Balzer, William K., 1986. "Biases in the recording of performance-related information: The effects of initial impression and centrality of the appraisal task," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 329-347, June.
    3. Foti, Roseanne J. & Lord, Robert G., 1987. "Prototypes and scripts: The effects of alternative methods of processing information on rating accuracy," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 318-340, June.
    4. Guzzo, Richard A. & Wagner, David B. & Maguire, Eamonn & Herr, Barbara & Hawley, Charles, 1986. "Implicit theories and the evaluation of group process and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 279-295, April.
    5. Martell, Richard F. & Guzzo, Richard A., 1991. "The dynamics of implicit theories of group performance: When and how do they operate?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 51-74, October.
    6. Martell, Richard F. & Willis, Cynthia E., 1993. "Effects of Observers' Performance Expectations on Behavior Ratings of Work Groups: Memory or Response Bias?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 91-109, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carmona, Salvador & Iyer, Govind & Reckers, Philip M.J., 2014. "Performance evaluation bias: A comparative study on the role of financial fixation, similarity-to-self and likeability," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 9-17.
    2. Kai A. Bauch & Peter Kotzian & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2021. "Likeability in subjective performance evaluations: does it bias managers’ weighting of performance measures?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 35-59, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barbara Ritter, 2006. "Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-making Process in Business Students," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 153-164, October.
    2. Fabrice L. Cavarretta & Sean T Hannah & Ronald F Piccolo & Mary Uhl-Bien, 2015. "Leadership beyond the Tipping Point: toward the Discovery of Inversions and Complementary Hypotheses," Working Papers hal-01214027, HAL.
    3. Robert B. Lount & Oliver J. Sheldon & Floor Rink & Katherine W. Phillips, 2015. "Biased Perceptions of Racially Diverse Teams and Their Consequences for Resource Support," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 1351-1364, October.
    4. Christian Rosales Sánchez & Dolores Díaz-Cabrera & Estefanía Hernández-Fernaud, 2019. "Does effectiveness in performance appraisal improve with rater training?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Goncalo, Jack A. & Polman, Evan & Maslach, Christina, 2010. "Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 13-24, September.
    6. Kai A. Bauch & Peter Kotzian & Barbara E. Weißenberger, 2021. "Likeability in subjective performance evaluations: does it bias managers’ weighting of performance measures?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 35-59, February.
    7. Peterson, Randall S. & Behfar, Kristin Jackson, 2003. "The dynamic relationship between performance feedback, trust, and conflict in groups: A longitudinal study," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 102-112.
    8. Supavich Fone Pengnate & Rathindra Sarathy & Todd J. Arnold, 2021. "The Influence of the Centrality of Visual Website Aesthetics on Online User Responses: Measure Development and Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 435-452, April.
    9. Fuller, Sally Riggs & Aldag, Ramon J., 1998. "Organizational Tonypandy: Lessons from a Quarter Century of the Groupthink Phenomenon," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 73(2-3), pages 163-184, February.
    10. Natalija Keck & Steffen R. Giessner & Niels Quaquebeke & Erica Kruijff, 2020. "When do Followers Perceive Their Leaders as Ethical? A Relational Models Perspective of Normatively Appropriate Conduct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 477-493, July.
    11. Gurtner, Andrea & Tschan, Franziska & Semmer, Norbert K. & Nagele, Christof, 2007. "Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 127-142, March.
    12. Porter, Thomas W. & Smith, Daniel C., 2005. "Tactical implementation and Murphy's law: factors affecting the severity of problems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(12), pages 1702-1711, December.
    13. Cavarretta, Fabrice & Hannah, Sean & Piccolo, Ronald & Uhl-Bien, Mary, 2015. "Leadership beyond the Tipping Point: toward the Discovery of Inversions and Complementary Hypotheses," ESSEC Working Papers WP1519, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jobhdp:v:82:y:2000:i:2:p:237-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.