IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v68y2006i2p153-164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-making Process in Business Students

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Ritter

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the various guidelines presented in the literature for instituting an ethics curriculum and to empirically study their effectiveness. Three questions are addressed concerning the trainability of ethics material and the proper integration and implementation of an ethics curriculum. An empirical study then tested the effect of ethics training on moral awareness and reasoning. The sample consisted of two business classes, one exposed to additional ethics curriculum (experimental), and one not exposed (control). For the experimental group, ethics exercises and discussion relevant to each topic were completed. Findings suggested gender differences such that, relative to other groups, women in the experimental group showed significantly improved moral awareness and decision-making processes. An explanation of the underlying cognitive processes is presented to explain the gender effect. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Ritter, 2006. "Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-making Process in Business Students," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 153-164, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:68:y:2006:i:2:p:153-164
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9062-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-006-9062-0
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-006-9062-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Foti, Roseanne J. & Lord, Robert G., 1987. "Prototypes and scripts: The effects of alternative methods of processing information on rating accuracy," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 318-340, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabrice L. Cavarretta & Sean T Hannah & Ronald F Piccolo & Mary Uhl-Bien, 2015. "Leadership beyond the Tipping Point: toward the Discovery of Inversions and Complementary Hypotheses," Working Papers hal-01214027, HAL.
    2. Natalija Keck & Steffen R. Giessner & Niels Quaquebeke & Erica Kruijff, 2020. "When do Followers Perceive Their Leaders as Ethical? A Relational Models Perspective of Normatively Appropriate Conduct," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 477-493, July.
    3. Baltes, Boris B. & Parker, Christopher P., 2000. "Reducing the Effects of Performance Expectations on Behavioral Ratings," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 237-267, July.
    4. Cavarretta, Fabrice & Hannah, Sean & Piccolo, Ronald & Uhl-Bien, Mary, 2015. "Leadership beyond the Tipping Point: toward the Discovery of Inversions and Complementary Hypotheses," ESSEC Working Papers WP1519, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:68:y:2006:i:2:p:153-164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.