Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Weak complementarity, path independence, and the intuition of the Willig condition

Contents:

Author Info

  • Palmquist, Raymond B.
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    No abstract is available for this item.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WJ6-4D58B7T-1/2/66d5b44668d0056f799a8147d9a5bc0e
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.

    Volume (Year): 49 (2005)
    Issue (Month): 1 (January)
    Pages: 103-115

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:49:y:2005:i:1:p:103-115

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622870

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Hanemann, W Michael, 1991. "Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 81(3), pages 635-47, June.
    2. Udo Ebert, 1998. "Evaluation of Nonmarket Goods: Recovering Unconditional Preferences," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(2), pages 241-254.
    3. Joseph A. Herriges & Catherine L. Kling & Daniel J. Phaneuf, 2000. "What's the Use? Welfare Estimates from Revealed Preference Models When Weak Complementarity Does Not Hold," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University 00-wp258, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    4. Vartia, Yrjo O, 1983. "Efficient Methods of Measuring Welfare Change and Compensated Income in Terms of Ordinary Demand Functions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 51(1), pages 79-98, January.
    5. Silberberg, Eugene, 1972. "Duality and the Many Consumer's Surpluses," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 62(5), pages 942-52, December.
    6. Larson, Douglas M., 1991. "Recovering weakly complementary preferences," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 97-108, September.
    7. V. Kerry Smith & H. Spencer Banzhaf, 2004. "A Diagrammatic Exposition of Weak Complementarity and the Willig Condition," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(2), pages 455-466.
    8. Randall, Alan & Stoll, John R, 1980. "Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 449-55, June.
    9. Willig, Robert D., 1978. "Incremental consumer's surplus and hedonic price adjustment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 227-253, April.
    10. Cunha-e-Sa, Maria A. & Ducla-Soares, Maria M., 1999. "Specification Tests for Mixed Demand Systems with an Emphasis on Combining Contingent Valuation and Revealed Data," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 215-233, September.
    11. Bockstael, N E & McConnell, K E, 1993. "Public Goods as Characteristics of Non-market Commodities," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, Royal Economic Society, vol. 103(420), pages 1244-57, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Phaneuf, Daniel J. & Smith, V. Kerry, 2006. "Recreation Demand Models," Handbook of Environmental Economics, Elsevier, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 671-761 Elsevier.
    2. von Haefen, Roger H., 2007. "Empirical strategies for incorporating weak complementarity into consumer demand models," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 15-31, July.
    3. Irina Klytchnikova & Michael Lokshin, 2009. "Measuring Welfare Gains from Better Quality Infrastructure," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, India Development Foundation, vol. 1(2), pages 87-109, December.
    4. Smith, V. Kerry & Banzhaf, H. Spencer, 2007. "Quality adjusted price indexes and the Willig condition," Economics Letters, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 43-48, January.
    5. David G. Brown, . "Preference-Theoretic Weak Complementarity: Getting More with Less," Departmental Working Papers, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University 2008-09, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    6. David G. Brown, . "A Revealed Preference Feasibility Condition for Weak Complementarity," Departmental Working Papers, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University 2009-08, Department of Economics, Louisiana State University.
    7. Kuminoff, Nicolai V., 2008. "Recovering Preferences from a Dual-Market Locational Equilibrium," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society 5989, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Ebert, Udo, 2007. "Revealed preference and household production," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 276-289, March.
    9. Lankia, Tuija & Huhtala, Anni, 2011. "Valuation of Trips to Second Homes in the Country: Do Environmental Attributes Matter?," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland, European Association of Agricultural Economists 114405, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. V. Kerry Smith & Mary F. Evans & H. Spencer Banzhaf & Christine Poulos, 2008. "Can Weak Substitution be Rehabilitated?," NBER Working Papers 13903, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:49:y:2005:i:1:p:103-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.