IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v146y2022icp166-175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Serious games for managers: Creating cognitive, financial, technological, social, and emotional value in in-service training

Author

Listed:
  • Allal-Chérif, Oihab
  • Lombardo, Evelyne
  • Jaotombo, Franck

Abstract

This article analyzes the value creation of serious games along five dimensions: (1) product design, (2) cost optimization, (3) impact on cognition, (4) experienced emotions, and (5) the socialization process. This research adopts an exploratory approach, mixes qualitative and quantitative methods, and is based on the case study of AXA, the number 1 global insurance brand. The authors interviewed learners, trainers, and managers from the company. The originality lies in the comparison of five different training methods: face-to-face, videoconference, non-tutored e-learning, tutored e-learning, and serious games. The qualitative study reveals that serious games create value according to five dimensions: conception, optimization, cognition, emotion, and socialization. The four recommendations are: (1) to integrate serious games into a wide-ranging training protocol; (2) to balance face-to-face and distance-learning phases; (3) to assess knowledge transfer and to check that learners can use what they learned in the real world; and (4) to ensure learner self-awareness and enhance cognitive engagement. The quantitative study suggests that value ​​created by serious games is significantly different from value ​​created by other learning methods. Additionally, managers recognize significantly higher value creation ​​than trainers and learners.

Suggested Citation

  • Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Lombardo, Evelyne & Jaotombo, Franck, 2022. "Serious games for managers: Creating cognitive, financial, technological, social, and emotional value in in-service training," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 166-175.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:146:y:2022:i:c:p:166-175
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322003113
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koivisto, Jonna & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 191-210.
    2. Imed Boughzala, 2014. "Characterizing the serious game and assessing learning goals," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-01243536, HAL.
    3. Goodman, Jodi S. & Wood, Robert E. & Chen, Zheng, 2011. "Feedback specificity, information processing, and transfer of training," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 253-267, July.
    4. Spil, Ton A.M. & Romijnders, Vincent & Sundaram, David & Wickramasinghe, Nilmini & Kijl, Björn, 2021. "Are serious games too serious? Diffusion of wearable technologies and the creation of a diffusion of serious games model," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    5. Lam, Chak Fu & DeRue, D. Scott & Karam, Elizabeth P. & Hollenbeck, John R., 2011. "The impact of feedback frequency on learning and task performance: Challenging the “more is better” assumption," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 217-228.
    6. Pando-Garcia, Julián & Periañez-Cañadillas, Iñaki & Charterina, Jon, 2016. "Business simulation games with and without supervision: An analysis based on the TAM model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1731-1736.
    7. Imed Boughzala, 2014. "Characterizing the serious game and assessing learning goals," Post-Print hal-01243536, HAL.
    8. Oihab Allal-Chérif & Marc Bidan & Mohamed Makhlouf, 2016. "Using serious games to manage knowledge and competencies: The seven-step development process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1153-1163, December.
    9. Köse, Dicle Berfin & Morschheuser, Benedikt & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "Is it a tool or a toy? How user’s conception of a system’s purpose affects their experience and use," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 461-474.
    10. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Makhlouf, Mohamed, 2016. "Using serious games to manage knowledge: The SECI model perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1539-1543.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Humberto Marín-Vega & Giner Alor-Hernández & Maritza Bustos-López & Ignacio López-Martínez & Norma Leticia Hernández-Chaparro, 2023. "Extended Reality (XR) Engines for Developing Gamified Apps and Serious Games: A Scoping Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, November.
    2. João M. Lopes & Sofia Gomes & Ivo Rodrigues, 2024. "Playing the gamification and co-creation game: a bibliometric literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 353-376, February.
    3. Mónica Fernanda Aranibar & Yolanda Baez-Lopez & Jorge Limon-Romero & María Concepción Ramírez-Barón & Blanca Rosa García Rivera & Melina Ortega-Pérez Tejada & Jacqueline Hernández Bejarano, 2022. "The Impact of Social Benefits on Work Commitment and Organizational Socialization in the Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Newbery, Robert & Lean, Jonathan & Moizer, Jonathan & Haddoud, Mohamed, 2018. "Entrepreneurial identity formation during the initial entrepreneurial experience: The influence of simulation feedback and existing identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 51-59.
    2. Kwee Keong Choong & Patrick W. Leung, 2022. "A Critical Review of the Precursors of the Knowledge Economy and Their Contemporary Research: Implications for the Computerized New Economy," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1573-1610, June.
    3. Allal-Chérif, Oihab, 2022. "Intelligent cathedrals: Using augmented reality, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence to provide an intense cultural, historical, and religious visitor experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    4. Canonico, Paolo & De Nito, Ernesto & Esposito, Vincenza & Pezzillo Iacono, Mario & Consiglio, Stefano, 2020. "Knowledge creation in the automotive industry: Analysing obeya-oriented practices using the SECI model," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 450-457.
    5. Andiola, Lindsay M., 2014. "Performance feedback in the audit environment: A review and synthesis of research on the behavioral effects," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 1-36.
    6. Hakmaoui, Abdelati & Oubrich, Mourad & Calof, Jonathan & El Ghazi, Hamid, 2022. "Towards an anticipatory system incorporating corporate foresight and competitive intelligence in creating knowledge: a longitudinal Moroccan bank case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Yela Aránega, Alba & Castaño Sánchez, Rafael, 2021. "Intelligent recruitment: How to identify, select, and retain talents from around the world using artificial intelligence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    8. Zhuoyao Cui & Haochen Yang, 2023. "From Game Elements to Active Learning Intentions: Exploring the Driving Factors in Digital Learning Platforms," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    9. Christiane Hinerasky, 2014. "Advances in Training Evaluation - Psychological, Educational, Economic, and Econometric Perspectives on the Kirkpatrick Model," Working Papers Dissertations 14, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    10. Sandro Casal & Nives DellaValle & Luigi Mittone & Ivan Soraperra, 2017. "Feedback and efficient behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Chun, Jinseok S. & Brockner, Joel & De Cremer, David, 2018. "How temporal and social comparisons in performance evaluation affect fairness perceptions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1-15.
    12. Zhou, Fei & Lin, Youhai & Mou, Jian & Cohen, Jason & Chen, Sihua, 2023. "Understanding the dark side of gamified interactions on short-form video platforms: Through a lens of expectations violations theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    13. Oluwaseun Niyi Anifowose & Matina Ghasemi & Banji Rildwan Olaleye, 2022. "Total Quality Management and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises’ (SMEs) Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation Speed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Adriaan (A.R.) Soetevent & Gert-Jan Romensen, 2017. "Tailored Feedback and Worker Green Behavior: Field Evidence from Bus Drivers," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-073/VII, Tinbergen Institute.
    15. José Braga Vasconcelos & Chris Kimble & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "A special issue on knowledge and competence management: Developing Enterprise solutions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1035-1039, December.
    16. Thomas, Nibu John & Baral, Rupashree & Crocco, Oliver S. & Mohanan, Swathi, 2023. "A framework for gamification in the metaverse era: How designers envision gameful experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    17. Christiane Hinerasky & Rene Fahr, 2014. "Learning Outcomes, Feedback, and the Performance Effects of a Training Program," Working Papers Dissertations 16, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    18. Andreea-Ionela Puiu & Rodica Ianole-Călin & Elena Druică, 2023. "Exploring the Consumer Acceptance of Nano Clothing Using a PLS-SEM Analysis," Stats, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-19, October.
    19. Alvin Chung Man Leung & Radhika Santhanam & Ron Chi-Wai Kwok & Wei Thoo Yue, 2023. "Could Gamification Designs Enhance Online Learning Through Personalization? Lessons from a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 27-49, March.
    20. Xi, Nannan & Hamari, Juho, 2019. "Does gamification satisfy needs? A study on the relationship between gamification features and intrinsic need satisfaction," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 210-221.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:146:y:2022:i:c:p:166-175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.