IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v133y2021icp376-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Truth and lies: The impact of modality on customer feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Ringler, Christine

Abstract

As more retailers ask customers for their attitudes following a consumption experience, it becomes increasingly important to understand the role of response modality and customer honesty. This research examines when customers tell “white lies” while providing feedback. Five studies reveal that customer attitudes solicited through dynamic communication modes are more inflated than attitudes solicited through other modalities. However, attitude construction is an important moderator to these effects. When customers construct an attitude on the spot through dynamic communication modes, attitudes are significantly inflated when compared to static communication modes. When attitudes exist prior to providing feedback, response modality no longer plays an important role. Marketers should not, however, discount inflated attitudes. Extending research on lying, communication modes, and attitude dissimulation, findings here also show that inflated attitudes can have a lasting and positive impact when customers form attitudes about a product or service for the first time.

Suggested Citation

  • Ringler, Christine, 2021. "Truth and lies: The impact of modality on customer feedback," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 376-387.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:133:y:2021:i:c:p:376-387
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014829632100343X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jennifer J. Argo & Katherine White & Darren W. Dahl, 2006. "Social Comparison Theory and Deception in the Interpersonal Exchange of Consumption Information," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 99-108, June.
    2. Kapoor, Payal S. & M S, Balaji & Maity, Moutusy & Jain, Nikunj Kumar, 2021. "Why consumers exaggerate in online reviews? Moral disengagement and dark personality traits," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    3. Lynch, John G, Jr & Srull, Thomas K, 1982. "Memory and Attentional Factors in Consumer Choice: Concepts and Research Methods," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(1), pages 18-37, June.
    4. Elizabeth Cowley & Christina I Anthony & Darren W DahlEditor & Amna KirmaniEditor & Peter R DarkeAssociate Editor, 2019. "Deception Memory: When Will Consumers Remember Their Lies?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 46(1), pages 180-199.
    5. Jennifer J. Argo & Baba Shiv, 2012. "Are White Lies as Innocuous as We Think?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 38(6), pages 1093-1102.
    6. Woodside, Arch G. & Sharma, Manish, 2017. "Case-based modeling of prolific liars and constant truth-tellers: Who are the dishonesty and honesty self-reporters?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 142-153.
    7. Gatti, Lucia & Pizzetti, Marta & Seele, Peter, 2021. "Green lies and their effect on intention to invest," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 228-240.
    8. Hristina Nikolova & Cait Lamberton & Nicole Verrochi Coleman & Vicki MorwitzEditor & Stijn van OsselaerAssociate Editor, 2018. "Stranger Danger: When and Why Consumer Dyads Behave Less Ethically Than Individuals," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 45(1), pages 90-108.
    9. Christina I. Anthony & Elizabeth Cowley, 2012. "The Labor of Lies: How Lying for Material Rewards Polarizes Consumers' Outcome Satisfaction," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(3), pages 478-492.
    10. Siemiatycki, J., 1979. "A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 69(3), pages 238-245.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Snyder, Hannah & Witell, Lars & Gustafsson, Anders & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2022. "Consumer lying behavior in service encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 755-769.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Snyder, Hannah & Witell, Lars & Gustafsson, Anders & McColl-Kennedy, Janet R., 2022. "Consumer lying behavior in service encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 755-769.
    2. Guang-Xin Xie & Hua Chang & Tracy Rank-Christman, 2022. "Contesting Dishonesty: When and Why Perspective-Taking Decreases Ethical Tolerance of Marketplace Deception," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 117-133, January.
    3. Sung Youl Jun & Tae Wook Ju & Hye Kyung Park & Jacob C. Lee & Tae Min Kim, 2023. "Information distortion in word-of-mouth retransmission: the effects of retransmitter intention and source expertise," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 1848-1876, November.
    4. Kapoor, Payal S. & M S, Balaji & Maity, Moutusy & Jain, Nikunj Kumar, 2021. "Why consumers exaggerate in online reviews? Moral disengagement and dark personality traits," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Wozniak, David & MacNeill, Timothy, 2020. "Racial discrimination in the lab: Evidence of statistical and taste-based discrimination," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    6. Lauren Skinner Beitelspacher & Thomas L. Baker & Adam Rapp & Dhruv Grewal, 2018. "Understanding the long-term implications of retailer returns in business-to-business relationships," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 252-272, March.
    7. Robin J. Evans & Thomas S. Richardson, 2013. "Marginal log-linear parameters for graphical Markov models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(4), pages 743-768, September.
    8. Philip Law, 2010. "Examination of the actual turnover decisions of female auditors in public accounting: Evidence from Hong Kong," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(5), pages 484-502, May.
    9. Ginder, Whitney & Byun, Sang-Eun, 2022. "To trust or not to trust? The interplay between labor-related CSR claim type and prior CSR reputation of apparel retailers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Francesca Bernini & Fabio La Rosa, 2024. "Research in the greenwashing field: concepts, theories, and potential impacts on economic and social value," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 28(2), pages 405-444, June.
    11. Guosen Miao & Guoping Chen & Fan Wang & Anupam Kumar Das, 2023. "The Effect of Corporate Greenwashing on Employees’ Environmental Performance: Person–Organization Values Fit Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Claudine Gartenberg & Julie Wulf, 2017. "Pay Harmony? Social Comparison and Performance Compensation in Multibusiness Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 39-55, February.
    13. Zhenhui (Jack) Jiang & Cheng Suang Heng & Ben C. F. Choi, 2013. "Research Note —Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 579-595, September.
    14. Román, Sergio & Riquelme, Isabel P. & Iacobucci, Dawn, 2023. "Fake or credible? Antecedents and consequences of perceived credibility in exaggerated online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    15. Jennifer R. Joe & Scott D. Vandervelde, 2007. "Do Auditor†Provided Nonaudit Services Improve Audit Effectiveness?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(2), pages 467-487, June.
    16. Abdelmoety, Ziad Hassan & Aboul-Dahab, Sameh & Agag, Gomaa, 2022. "A cross cultural investigation of retailers commitment to CSR and customer citizenship behaviour: The role of ethical standard and value relevance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Habel, Johannes & Alavi, Sascha & Pick, Doreén, 2017. "When serving customers includes correcting them: Understanding the ambivalent effects of enforcing service rules," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 919-941.
    18. Walker, Chad & Baxter, Jamie & Ouellette, Danielle, 2015. "Adding insult to injury: The development of psychosocial stress in Ontario wind turbine communities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 358-365.
    19. Rohit Aggarwal & Ram Gopal & Ramesh Sankaranarayanan, 2007. "Negative Blogs, Positive Outcomes: When should Firms Permit Employees to Blog Honestly?," Working Papers 07-32, NET Institute, revised Sep 2007.
    20. González-Benito, Óscar & Martos-Partal, Mercedes & San Martín, Sonia, 2015. "Brands as substitutes for the need for touch in online shopping," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 121-125.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:133:y:2021:i:c:p:376-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.