IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v129y2021icp723-735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing structural inter-organizational tensions in complex product systems projects: Lessons from the Metis case

Author

Listed:
  • Galati, Francesco
  • Bigliardi, Barbara
  • Galati, Roberta
  • Petroni, Giorgio

Abstract

This paper examines a Complex Product System (CoPS) project, Metis, an externally occulted coronagraph that is part of the ESA’s Solar Orbiter mission and whose development required the involvement of scientists, international firms and space agencies. Specifically, this study attempted to investigate two main issues: (i) the main structural inter-organizational tensions emerged over the years, and (ii) if and how they were solved, distinguishing between contingent and structural solutions. The coronagraph was successfully delivered to the European Space Agency (ESA) in 2017, notwithstanding two main tensions related to the shortage of financial resources and to the organizational design of the ESA mission. This study takes different theoretical lenses (contingency theory, paradox theory, and social balance theory) to infer about how structural inter-organizational tensions were mitigated, proposing the need to combine several theoretical perspectives. The contingent and structural solutions identified and discussed could have implications for several future CoPS projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Galati, Francesco & Bigliardi, Barbara & Galati, Roberta & Petroni, Giorgio, 2021. "Managing structural inter-organizational tensions in complex product systems projects: Lessons from the Metis case," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 723-735.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:129:y:2021:i:c:p:723-735
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319306332
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hobday, Mike, 1998. "Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 689-710, February.
    2. Braun, Corina & Hadwich, Karsten, 2016. "Complexity of internal services: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3508-3522.
    3. Prencipe, Andrea, 2000. "Breadth and depth of technological capabilities in CoPS: the case of the aircraft engine control system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 895-911, August.
    4. James Moody & Mark Dodgson, 2006. "Managing Complex Collaborative Projects: Lessons from the Development of a New Satellite," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 568-588, September.
    5. Andrew Davies, 1997. "The Life Cycle of a Complex Product System," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(03), pages 229-256.
    6. Lee, Joosung J. & Yoon, Hyungseok, 2015. "A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1296-1313.
    7. Alex Gillett & Kim Loader & Bob Doherty & Jonathan M. Scott, 2019. "An Examination of Tensions in a Hybrid Collaboration: A Longitudinal Study of an Empty Homes Project," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(4), pages 949-967, July.
    8. Erkko Autio, 2005. "Creative tension: the significance of Ben Oviatt's and Patricia McDougall's article ‘toward a theory of international new ventures’," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 36(1), pages 9-19, January.
    9. Tae-Young Park, 2013. "How a latecomer succeeded in a complex product system industry: three case studies in the Korean telecommunication systems," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(2), pages 363-396, April.
    10. Fleming, Lee & Sorenson, Olav, 2001. "Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1019-1039, August.
    11. Xie, Xuemei & Wang, Lijun & Zeng, Saixing, 2018. "Inter-organizational knowledge acquisition and firms' radical innovation: A moderated mediation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 295-306.
    12. Lazzeretti, Luciana & Capone, Francesco, 2016. "How proximity matters in innovation networks dynamics along the cluster evolution. A study of the high technology applied to cultural goods," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5855-5865.
    13. Kiamehr, Mehdi & Hobday, Mike & Hamedi, Mohsen, 2015. "Latecomer firm strategies in complex product systems (CoPS): The case of Iran’s thermal electricity generation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6), pages 1240-1251.
    14. Xie, Xuemei & Fang, Liangxiu & Zeng, Saixing, 2016. "Collaborative innovation network and knowledge transfer performance: A fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5210-5215.
    15. Hobday, Mike & Rush, Howard & Tidd, Joe, 2000. "Innovation in complex products and system," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 793-804, August.
    16. Cherrier, Helene & Goswami, Paromita & Ray, Subhasis, 2018. "Social entrepreneurship: Creating value in the context of institutional complexity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 245-258.
    17. Gann, David M. & Salter, Ammon J., 2000. "Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 955-972, August.
    18. Jae-Yong Choung & Hye-Ran Hwang, 2007. "Developing the complex system in Korea: the case study of TDX and CDMA telecom system," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 204-225.
    19. Giovanna Ferraro & Antonio Iovanella, 2018. "Clairvoyant targeted attack on complex networks," International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 41-62.
    20. van Fenema, Paul C. & Loebbecke, Claudia, 2014. "Towards a framework for managing strategic tensions in dyadic interorganizational relationships," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 516-524.
    21. Chen, Stephen & Lin, Nidthida, 2019. "The effect of inter- and intra-organizational distances on success of offshored outsourced innovation: A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 519-529.
    22. Anne-Sophie Fernandez & Fréderic Le Roy & Devi Gnyawali, 2014. "Sources and management of tension in co-opetition case evidence from telecommunications satellites manufacturing in Europe," Post-Print hal-02042458, HAL.
    23. Davies, Andrew & Brady, Tim, 2000. "Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 931-953, August.
    24. Kiamehr, Mehdi, 2017. "Paths of technological capability building in complex capital goods: The case of hydro electricity generation systems in Iran," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 215-230.
    25. Vasconcelos, Flávio C. & Ramirez, Rafael, 2011. "Complexity in business environments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 236-241, March.
    26. Candace Jones & William S. Hesterly & Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist & Stephen P. Borgatti, 1998. "Professional Service Constellations: How Strategies and Capabilities Influence Collaborative Stability and Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(3), pages 396-410, June.
    27. Constantine Andriopoulos & Marianne W. Lewis, 2009. "Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 696-717, August.
    28. Jörg Sydow & Arnold Windeler & Jörg Sydow & Arnold Windeler, 2003. "Knowledge, Trust, and Control: Managing Tensions and Contradictions in a Regional Network of Service Firms," International Studies of Management & Organization, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 69-100, January.
    29. Naghizadeh, Mohammad & Manteghi, Manoochehr & Ranga, Marina & Naghizadeh, Reza, 2017. "Managing integration in complex product systems: The experience of the IR-150 aircraft design program," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 253-261.
    30. Matteo Cinelli & Giovanna Ferraro & Antonio Iovanella, 2019. "Network processes for collaborative innovation," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 36(4), pages 430-452.
    31. Ritala, Paavo & Huizingh, Eelko & Almpanopoulou, Argyro & Wijbenga, Paul, 2017. "Tensions in R&D networks: Implications for knowledge search and integration," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 311-322.
    32. Miller, Roger, et al, 1995. "Innovation in Complex Systems Industries: The Case of Flight Simulation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 4(2), pages 363-400.
    33. Tobias Buchmann & Andreas Pyka, 2015. "The evolution of innovation networks: the case of a publicly funded German automotive network," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1-2), pages 114-139, March.
    34. Muhamed Kudic & Andreas Pyka & Marco Sunder, 2016. "The formation of R&D cooperation ties: an event history analysis for German laser source manufacturers," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(4), pages 649-670.
    35. Tobias Buchmann, 2015. "The Evolution of Innovation Networks," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-658-10383-5, November.
    36. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    37. Michael Hobday & Andrew Davies & Andrea Prencipe, 2005. "Systems integration: a core capability of the modern corporation," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 14(6), pages 1109-1143, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pejman Peykani & Jafar Gheidar-Kheljani & Sheida Shahabadi & Seyyed Hassan Ghodsypour & Mojtaba Nouri, 2023. "A two-phase resource-constrained project scheduling approach for design and development of complex product systems," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Guijarro-Garcia, María & Ulrich, Klaus, 2022. "Fostering sustainable growth in aeronautics: Open social innovation, multifunctional team management, and collaborative governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pierre Barbaroux & Victor Santos Paulino, 2022. "Why do motives matter? A demand-based view of the dynamics of a complex products and systems (CoPS) industry," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 1175-1204, September.
    2. Kwak, Kiho & Yoon, Hyungseok (David), 2020. "Unpacking transnational industry legitimacy dynamics, windows of opportunity, and latecomers’ catch-up in complex product systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(4).
    3. Naghizadeh, Mohammad & Manteghi, Manoochehr & Ranga, Marina & Naghizadeh, Reza, 2017. "Managing integration in complex product systems: The experience of the IR-150 aircraft design program," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 253-261.
    4. Han Huang & Jie Xiong & Junfang Zhang, 2021. "Windows of Opportunity in the CoPS’s Catch-Up Process: A Case Study of China’s High-Speed Train Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. De Toni, Alberto F. & Pessot, Elena, 2021. "Investigating organisational learning to master project complexity: An embedded case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 541-554.
    6. Zhongji Yang & Liangqun Qi & Xin Li & Tianxi Wang, 2022. "How Does Successful Catch-Up Occur in Complex Products and Systems from the Innovation Ecosystem Perspective? A Case of China’s High-Speed Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Lee, Joosung J. & Yoon, Hyungseok, 2015. "A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(7), pages 1296-1313.
    8. Huenteler, Joern & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Ossenbrink, Jan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Technology life-cycles in the energy sector — Technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 102-121.
    9. Gil, Nuno & Miozzo, Marcela & Massini, Silvia, 2012. "The innovation potential of new infrastructure development: An empirical study of Heathrow airport's T5 project," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 452-466.
    10. Lina Mao & Jinghua Li & Changwei Guo, 2019. "Integrator’s Coordination on Technological Innovation Performance in China: The Dual Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    11. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    12. Binz, Christian & Gosens, Jorrit & Hansen, Teis & Hansen, Ulrich Elmer, 2017. "Toward Technology-Sensitive Catching-Up Policies: Insights from Renewable Energy in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 418-437.
    13. Molden, Lars Hovdan & Clausen, Tommy Hoyvarde, 2021. "Playing 3D chess, or how firms can thrive under complexity: The mediating role of innovation capabilities in the use of innovation input," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-13.
    14. Gil, Nuno, 2007. "On the value of project safeguards: Embedding real options in complex products and systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 980-999, September.
    15. Mark Lorenzen & Lars Frederiksen, 2005. "On the Economics of Innovation Projects Product Experimentation in the Music Industry," DRUID Working Papers 05-23, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    16. Prencipe, Andrea & Tell, Fredrik, 2001. "Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1373-1394, December.
    17. Gholz, Eugene & James, Andrew D. & Speller, Thomas H., 2018. "The second face of systems integration: An empirical analysis of supply chains to complex product systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1478-1494.
    18. Miozzo, Marcela & Grimshaw, Damian, 2005. "Modularity and innovation in knowledge-intensive business services: IT outsourcing in Germany and the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(9), pages 1419-1439, November.
    19. Eugenia Cacciatori, 2004. "Organisational Memory and Innovation Across Projects: Integrated Service Provision in Engineering Design Firms," SPRU Working Paper Series 117, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Davies, Andrew & Brady, Tim, 2000. "Organisational capabilities and learning in complex product systems: towards repeatable solutions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(7-8), pages 931-953, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:129:y:2021:i:c:p:723-735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.