IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ijoais/v13y2012i3p287-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model-based auditing using REA

Author

Listed:
  • Weigand, Hans
  • Elsas, Philip

Abstract

The recent financial crisis has renewed interest in the value of the owner-ordered auditing tradition that starts from society's long-term interest rather than management interest. This tradition uses a model-based auditing approach in which control requirements are derived in a principled way. A problem with this approach is that it has been proven hard to apply it in modern complex organizations. Making it feasible requires at least an adequate enterprise modeling approach. In this paper, it is shown that the REA ontology fulfills most of the requirements for such a model-based approach. The analysis also suggests some directions in which REA can be extended.

Suggested Citation

  • Weigand, Hans & Elsas, Philip, 2012. "Model-based auditing using REA," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 287-310.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:13:y:2012:i:3:p:287-310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.accinf.2012.06.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089512000449
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.accinf.2012.06.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaspar, Jose-Miguel & Massa, Massimo & Matos, Pedro, 2005. "Shareholder investment horizons and the market for corporate control," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 135-165, April.
    2. Elsas, Ph.I., 2008. "X-raying Segregation of Duties: Support to illuminate an enterprise's immunity to solo-fraud," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 82-93.
    3. F. Gailly & G. Poels, 2007. "Ontology-driven Business Modelling: Improving the Conceptual Representation of the REA Ontology," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 07/444, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Yuxin & Tian, Yifu & Teixeira, André & Hulstijn, Joris & Tan, Yao-Hua, 2016. "Fault detection and diagnosis for compliance monitoring in international supply chains," Other publications TiSEM 3a2a4fd2-b5be-4f65-ab7b-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Jayasinghe Arachchig, J., 2013. "A unified modeling framework for service design," Other publications TiSEM 6a285c11-de61-4bbc-9a6c-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Sohei Ito & Dominik Vymětal & Roman Šperka & Michal Halaška, 2018. "Process mining of a multi-agent business simulator," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 500-531, December.
    4. repec:opa:wpaper:0015 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kim, Rosemary & Gangolly, Jagdish & Elsas, Philip, 2017. "A framework for analytics and simulation of accounting information systems: A Petri net modeling primer," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 30-54.
    6. W. Kobelsky, Kevin, 2014. "A conceptual model for segregation of duties: Integrating theory and practice for manual and IT-supported processes," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 304-322.
    7. Heise, David & Strecker, Stefan & Frank, Ulrich, 2014. "ControlML: A domain-specific modeling language in support of assessing internal controls and the internal control system," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 224-245.
    8. Dominik Vymetal & Sohei Ito, 2016. "The Formalization of a Generic Trading Company Model Using Software Agents as Active Elements," Working Papers 0029, Silesian University, School of Business Administration.
    9. Veenstra, Albert & Hulstijn, Joris & Griffioen, Paul, 2014. "Control and Monitoring in International Logistics Chains," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Current Issues and Emerging Practices. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferenc, volume 19, pages 365-390, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lars Hornuf & Paul P. Momtaz & Rachel J. Nam & Ye Yuan, 2023. "Cybercrime on the Ethereum Blockchain," CESifo Working Paper Series 10598, CESifo.
    2. Caroline Flammer & Michael W. Toffel & Kala Viswanathan, 2021. "Shareholder activism and firms' voluntary disclosure of climate change risks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1850-1879, October.
    3. Leon Zolotoy & Don O’Sullivan & Keke Song, 2021. "The Role of Ethical Standards in the Relationship Between Religious Social Norms and M&A Announcement Returns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 721-742, May.
    4. Chan, Kalok & Covrig, Vicentiu, 2012. "What determines mutual fund trading in foreign stocks?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 793-817.
    5. Chang, Xiaochen & Guo, Songlin & Huang, Junkai, 2022. "Kidnapped mutual funds: Irrational preference of naive investors and fund incentive distortion," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Ruth V. Aguilera & Kurt A. Desender & Mónica López-Puertas Lamy & Jun Ho Lee, 2017. "The governance impact of a changing investor landscape," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(2), pages 195-221, February.
    7. Cristina Cella & Andrew Ellul & Mariassunta Giannetti, 2013. "Investors' Horizons and the Amplification of Market Shocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(7), pages 1607-1648.
    8. Correa, Ricardo & Goldberg, Linda S., 2022. "Bank complexity, governance, and risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    9. Ryan D. Leece & Todd P. White, 2017. "The effects of firms’ information environment on analysts’ herding behavior," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 503-525, February.
    10. Chyz, James A. & Ching Leung, Winnie Siu & Zhen Li, Oliver & Meng Rui, Oliver, 2013. "Labor unions and tax aggressiveness," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 675-698.
    11. Stefano Ramelli & Alexander F Wagner & Richard J Zeckhauser & Alexandre Ziegler, 2021. "Investor Rewards to Climate Responsibility: Stock-Price Responses to the Opposite Shocks of the 2016 and 2020 U.S. Elections [Asset pricing with liquidity risk]," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 748-787.
    12. Justyna Przychodzen, 2012. "The economic costs of economic risk in the financial market (Europejskie rynki finansowe w obliczu globalnego kryzysu)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 10(39), pages 54-63.
    13. Dasgupta, Amil & Fos, Vyacheslav & Sautner, Zacharias, 2021. "Institutional investors and corporate governance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112114, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. repec:bof:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201508131351 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Xu, Tianli & Xu, Longbing & Zhu, Siyuan, 2023. "Common ownership and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    16. Najah Attig & Sean Cleary, 2014. "Organizational Capital and Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivity: The Effect of Management Quality Practices," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 43(3), pages 473-504, September.
    17. Zhao, Hong & Jin, Dawei & Li, Hui & Wang, Haizhi, 2021. "Affiliated bankers on board and firm environmental management: U.S. evidence," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    18. Li, Lin & Tong, Wilson H.S., 2018. "Information uncertainty and target valuation in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 84-107.
    19. Mazur, Mieszko & Salganik-Shoshan, Galla & Walker, Thomas & Wang, Jun, 2018. "Proximity and litigation: Evidence from the geographic location of institutional investors," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 60-74.
    20. Kim, Hyun-Dong & Kim, Yura & Mantecon, Tomas & Song, Kyojik Roy, 2019. "Short-term institutional investors and agency costs of debt," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 195-210.
    21. Caselli, Stefano & Gatti, Stefano & Chiarella, Carlo & Gigante, Gimede & Negri, Giulia, 2023. "Do shareholders really matter for firm performance? Evidence from the ownership characteristics of Italian listed companies," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ijoais:v:13:y:2012:i:3:p:287-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-accounting-information-systems/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.