Making performance indicators work: The experience of using consensus indicators for external assessment of health and social services at regional level in Spain
AbstractObjectives To describe a methodology and the results of projects combining consensus processes for indicator development with methods of external assessment of health and social services.Methods Our methodology can be characterized by a four-step approach: (1) stakeholder involvement and creating an enabling environment, (2) using standardized consensus methods for indicator development, (3) using rigorous external evaluation methods to assess results and (4) developing and implementing quality improvement initiatives. We describe each step in detail and discuss factors of success and pitfalls based on our experience of applying the methodology in 648 health/social centres and reviewing overall 68,616 case records.Results We observe in four sectors (assisted living, elderly health care, care for people with drug abuse problems, and care for abused woman) improvements in overall quality improvement rates, ranging from 9.5% to 65.6%. Improvements in overall rates are accompanied by reduction in range of up to 48.8.Conclusions The conscientious setting up of an enabling environment and the systematic involvement of professionals in designing indicators and setting standards is a key to improving performance. Our research may entail lessons for policy makers on the current debate on pay for performance models.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Health Policy.
Volume (Year): 90 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 (April)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol
Performance assessment Consensus indicators External assessment Pay for performance Social care Spain;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Campbell, S. M. & Roland, M. O. & Buetow, S. A., 2000. "Defining quality of care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(11), pages 1611-1625, December.
- Norton, Edward C., 1992. "Incentive regulation of nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 105-128, August.
- Sabina Nuti & Chiara Seghieri & Milena Vainieri, 2013. "Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience," Journal of Management and Governance, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 59-69, February.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei) or () The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.