IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v75y2019icp38-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalising the evaluation function: A South African study of impartiality, use and cost

Author

Listed:
  • Blaser Mapitsa, Caitlin
  • Chirau, Takunda J.

Abstract

This article explores the implications of outsourcing the evaluation function in South Africa, a context where there is a mismatch between evaluation supply and demand. It unpacks the tradeoffs between internal and external evaluation, and challenges some commonly held assumptions about both.

Suggested Citation

  • Blaser Mapitsa, Caitlin & Chirau, Takunda J., 2019. "Institutionalising the evaluation function: A South African study of impartiality, use and cost," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 38-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:38-42
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.04.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718918302076
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.04.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Hart, Rebecca E. & Townsend, Shannon H. & Gagné, Marc, 2011. "Using hybrid models to support the development of organizational evaluation capacity: A case narrative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 228-235, August.
    2. Guerra-López, Ingrid & Hicks, Karen, 2015. "The participatory design of a performance oriented monitoring and evaluation system in an international development environment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 21-30.
    3. Johnson, R. Burke, 1998. "Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 93-110, February.
    4. Lisa Bornstein, 2006. "Systems of Accountability, Webs of Deceit? Monitoring and Evaluation in South African NGOs," Development, Palgrave Macmillan;Society for International Deveopment, vol. 49(2), pages 52-61, June.
    5. Sean Phillips & Ian Goldman & Nolwazi Gasa & Ismail Akhalwaya & Bernadette Leon, 2014. "A focus on M&E of results: an example from the Presidency, South Africa," Journal of Development Effectiveness, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 392-406, December.
    6. Mathison, Sandra, 1994. "Rethinking the evaluator role: Partnerships between organizations and evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 299-304.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grant, Peter R., 1997. "The relocation of nursing home residents: An illustration of the advantages gained by planning a new program and designing an implementation evaluation together," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 507-516, November.
    2. Olsen, Odd Einar & Lindoe, Preben, 2004. "Trailing research based evaluation; phases and roles," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 371-380, November.
    3. Madden Ciarán, 2020. "A brief exploration of the Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service’s (IGEES) outputs and its role in Department of Children and Youth Affairs policymaking," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 68(2), pages 81-96, May.
    4. Heinz, Laura C. & Grant, Peter R., 2003. "A process evaluation of a parenting group for parents with intellectual disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 263-274, August.
    5. McConnell, Jesse, 2019. "Adoption for adaptation: A theory-based approach for monitoring a complex policy initiative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 214-223.
    6. Le Fanu, Guy, 2014. "International development, disability, and education: Towards a capabilities-focused discourse and praxis," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 69-79.
    7. Schlaufer, Caroline, 2018. "The contribution of evaluations to the discourse quality of newspaper content," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 157-165.
    8. Barbara Kożuch & Adam Jabłoński, 2018. "The Strategic Hybrids of Water Supply Companies as an Effective Management Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-43, November.
    9. Rogers, Alison F. & Kelly, Leanne M. & McCoy, Alicia, 2019. "Pathways to becoming an internal evaluator: Perspectives from the Australian non-government sector," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 102-109.
    10. Nelson Grima & Lisa Ringhofer & Simron J. Singh & Barbara Smetschka & Christian Lauk, 2017. "Mainstreaming Biodiversity in Development Practice: Can the Concept of PES Deliver?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 17(4), pages 267-281, October.
    11. Yusa, Anna & Hynie, Michaela & Mitchell, Scott, 2016. "Utilization of internal evaluation results by community mental health organizations: Credibility in different forms," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-18.
    12. Heimlich, Joe E., 2010. "Environmental education evaluation: Reinterpreting education as a strategy for meeting mission," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 180-185, May.
    13. Jacob, Steve & Ouvrard, Laurence & Bélanger, Jean-François, 2011. "Participatory evaluation and process use within a social aid organization for at-risk families and youth," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 113-123, May.
    14. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Whynot, Jane & Thériault, Étienne, 2015. "Application of an organizational evaluation capacity self-assessment instrument to different organizations: Similarities and lessons learned," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-55.
    15. Bernard Katerengabo & Christopher Gakuu & Harriet Kidombo, 2023. "Households’ Involvement in the Preparation of Monitoring and Evaluation Plan and Performance of Tanzania Conditional Cash Transfer Project," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 1-40, May.
    16. James Leslie Herbert, 2014. "Researching Evaluation Influence," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(5), pages 388-419, October.
    17. Schalock, Robert L. & Lee, Tim & Verdugo, Miguel & Swart, Kees & Claes, Claudia & van Loon, Jos & Lee, Chun-Shin, 2014. "An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 110-118.
    18. Willging, Cathleen E. & Helitzer, Deborah & Thompson, Janice, 2006. "`Sharing wisdom': Lessons learned during the development of a diabetes prevention intervention for urban American Indian women," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 130-140, May.
    19. Adela Itzkin & Jai Kumar Clifford-Holmes & Mary Scholes & Kaera Coetzer, 2022. "Approaches to Enhance Integration and Monitoring for Social-Ecological Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    20. Cole, Donald C. & Levin, Carol & Loechl, Cornelia & Thiele, Graham & Grant, Frederick & Girard, Aimee Webb & Sindi, Kirimi & Low, Jan, 2016. "Planning an integrated agriculture and health program and designing its evaluation: Experience from Western Kenya," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 11-22.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:75:y:2019:i:c:p:38-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.