IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v34y2011i3p228-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using hybrid models to support the development of organizational evaluation capacity: A case narrative

Author

Listed:
  • Bourgeois, Isabelle
  • Hart, Rebecca E.
  • Townsend, Shannon H.
  • Gagné, Marc

Abstract

The ongoing need for public sector organizations to enhance their internal evaluation capacity is increasingly resulting in the use of hybrid evaluation project models, where internal evaluators work with external contracted evaluators to complete evaluative work. This paper first seeks to identify what is currently known about internal evaluation through a synthesis of the literature in this area. It then presents a case narrative illustrating how internal and external evaluation approaches may be used together to strengthen an evaluation project and to develop the evaluation capacity of the organization. Lessons learned include the need to integrate internal and external resources throughout the evaluation and to clarify expectations at the outset of the project.

Suggested Citation

  • Bourgeois, Isabelle & Hart, Rebecca E. & Townsend, Shannon H. & Gagné, Marc, 2011. "Using hybrid models to support the development of organizational evaluation capacity: A case narrative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 228-235, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:34:y:2011:i:3:p:228-235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718911000279
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winberg, Alan, 1991. "Maximizing the contribution of internal evaluation units," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 167-172, January.
    2. Mathison, Sandra, 1991. "Role conflicts for internal evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 173-179, January.
    3. Preskill, Hallie, 1994. "Evaluation's role in enhancing organizational learning: A model for practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 291-297.
    4. Lyon, Eleanor, 1989. "In-house research: A consideration of roles and advantages," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 241-248, January.
    5. Torres, Rosalie T., 1991. "Improving the quality of internal evaluation: The evaluator as consultant-mediator," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 189-198, January.
    6. Mathison, Sandra, 1991. "What do we know about internal evaluation?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 159-165, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madden Ciarán, 2020. "A brief exploration of the Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service’s (IGEES) outputs and its role in Department of Children and Youth Affairs policymaking," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 68(2), pages 81-96, May.
    2. Barbara Kożuch & Adam Jabłoński, 2018. "The Strategic Hybrids of Water Supply Companies as an Effective Management Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-43, November.
    3. Rogers, Alison F. & Kelly, Leanne M. & McCoy, Alicia, 2019. "Pathways to becoming an internal evaluator: Perspectives from the Australian non-government sector," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 102-109.
    4. Blaser Mapitsa, Caitlin & Chirau, Takunda J., 2019. "Institutionalising the evaluation function: A South African study of impartiality, use and cost," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 38-42.
    5. Yusa, Anna & Hynie, Michaela & Mitchell, Scott, 2016. "Utilization of internal evaluation results by community mental health organizations: Credibility in different forms," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-18.
    6. Schalock, Robert L. & Lee, Tim & Verdugo, Miguel & Swart, Kees & Claes, Claudia & van Loon, Jos & Lee, Chun-Shin, 2014. "An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 110-118.
    7. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Whynot, Jane & Thériault, Étienne, 2015. "Application of an organizational evaluation capacity self-assessment instrument to different organizations: Similarities and lessons learned," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-55.
    8. Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel & Lee, Tim, 2016. "A systematic approach to an organization’s sustainability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 56-63.
    9. Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel Angel & van Loon, Jos, 2018. "Understanding organization transformation in evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 53-60.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Minnett, Ann M., 1999. "Internal evaluation in a self-reflective organization: one nonprofit agency's model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 353-362, August.
    2. Yusa, Anna & Hynie, Michaela & Mitchell, Scott, 2016. "Utilization of internal evaluation results by community mental health organizations: Credibility in different forms," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-18.
    3. Madden Ciarán, 2020. "A brief exploration of the Irish Government Economic and Evaluation Service’s (IGEES) outputs and its role in Department of Children and Youth Affairs policymaking," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 68(2), pages 81-96, May.
    4. Michael Morris & Robin Cohn, 1993. "Program Evaluators and Ethical Challenges," Evaluation Review, , vol. 17(6), pages 621-642, December.
    5. Daigneault, Pierre-Marc, 2014. "Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 171-181.
    6. Gagnon, France & Aubry, Tim & Cousins, J. Bradley & Goh, Swee C. & Elliott, Catherine, 2018. "Validation of the evaluation capacity in organizations questionnaire," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 166-175.
    7. Schalock, Robert L. & Bonham, Gordon S. & Marchand, Cristine B., 2000. "Consumer based quality of life assessment: a path model of perceived satisfaction," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 77-87, February.
    8. Ryan, Katherine E. & Geissler, Barbara & Knell, Suzanne, 1996. "Progress and accountability in family literacy: Lessons from a collaborative approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 263-272, August.
    9. James Leslie Herbert, 2014. "Researching Evaluation Influence," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(5), pages 388-419, October.
    10. Wetzel, Mary C. & McNaboe, Chris & McNaboe, Kathleen A., 1995. "A mission based ecological evaluation of a summer camp for youth with developmental disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 37-46.
    11. Fawson, Trude J. & Moss-Summers, Vanessa & Marie May, Sharon, 2004. "`Somewhere out there:' a survey of the oft lone journey of evaluators working in business and industry settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 335-340, August.
    12. Johnson, R. Burke, 1998. "Toward a theoretical model of evaluation utilization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 93-110, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:34:y:2011:i:3:p:228-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.