IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v17y1993i6p621-642.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Program Evaluators and Ethical Challenges

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Morris

    (University of New Haven)

  • Robin Cohn

    (University of New Haven)

Abstract

A random sample of American Evaluation Association members was surveyed concerning the ethical challenges they encountered in their evaluation work Respondents who indicated that they had faced such challenges differed significantly (in amount and type of evaluation experi ence, as well as professional discipline) from those who said that they had never encountered an ethical conflict. Ethical problems associated with the reporting of findings by the evaluator were, by far, the most frequently mentioned. Also frequently described were conflicts involving the misinterpretation/misuse of results by stakeholders, contracting with stakeholders, and adherence to disclosure agreements. Aframeworkfor interpreting the study's findings, based on understanding the subjective commitment of evaluators to the roles of scientist and/or helping professional, is proposed .

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Morris & Robin Cohn, 1993. "Program Evaluators and Ethical Challenges," Evaluation Review, , vol. 17(6), pages 621-642, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:17:y:1993:i:6:p:621-642
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9301700603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9301700603
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9301700603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Windle, Charles & Neigher, William, 1978. "Ethical problems in program evaluation: Advice for trapped evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 97-107, January.
    2. Korr, Wynne Sandra, 1982. "How evaluators can deal with role conflict," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 53-58, January.
    3. Wei Li Fang & Mary Catherine Ellwein, 1990. "Photography and Ethics in Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 14(1), pages 100-107, February.
    4. Mathison, Sandra, 1991. "Role conflicts for internal evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 173-179, January.
    5. Sieber, Joan E. & Sanders, Nancy, 1978. "Ethical problems in program evaluation: Roles, not models," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 1(2), pages 117-120, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pleger, Lyn & Sager, Fritz, 2018. "Betterment, undermining, support and distortion: A heuristic model for the analysis of pressure on evaluators," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 166-172.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sherri N. Sheinfeld & Gary L. Lord, 1981. "The Ethics of Evaluation Researchers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 5(3), pages 377-391, June.
    2. Minnett, Ann M., 1999. "Internal evaluation in a self-reflective organization: one nonprofit agency's model," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 353-362, August.
    3. Bourgeois, Isabelle & Hart, Rebecca E. & Townsend, Shannon H. & Gagné, Marc, 2011. "Using hybrid models to support the development of organizational evaluation capacity: A case narrative," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 228-235, August.
    4. Cherniss, Cary & Fishman, Daniel B., 2004. "The Mesquite `MicroSociety' school: identifying organizational factors that facilitate successful adoption of an innovative program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 79-88, February.
    5. William D. Neigher & Herbert C. Schulberg, 1982. "Evaluating the Outcomes of Human Service Programs," Evaluation Review, , vol. 6(6), pages 731-752, December.
    6. Wetzel, Mary C. & McNaboe, Chris & McNaboe, Kathleen A., 1995. "A mission based ecological evaluation of a summer camp for youth with developmental disabilities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 37-46.
    7. Fawson, Trude J. & Moss-Summers, Vanessa & Marie May, Sharon, 2004. "`Somewhere out there:' a survey of the oft lone journey of evaluators working in business and industry settings," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 335-340, August.
    8. Eugenie Walsh Flaherty & Charles Windle, 1981. "Mandated Evaluation in Community Mental Health Centers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 5(5), pages 620-638, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:17:y:1993:i:6:p:621-642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.