IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/evarev/v14y1990i1p100-107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Photography and Ethics in Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Li Fang

    (University of Virginia)

  • Mary Catherine Ellwein

    (University of Virginia)

Abstract

In recent years evaluators have been using photography as one method for collecting data in qualitative evaluatron studies. The public nature of photographs have ethical implications for application in evaluation practice. Of primary ethical concern are the issues of honesty and accurate representation in the sampling plan, proposed use of the photographs, and selection and interpretation of the photographs for presentation. Additional considerations include costs and benefits for the evaluator, clients, participants, and society.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Li Fang & Mary Catherine Ellwein, 1990. "Photography and Ethics in Evaluation," Evaluation Review, , vol. 14(1), pages 100-107, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:14:y:1990:i:1:p:100-107
    DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9001400107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0193841X9001400107
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0193841X9001400107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Morris & Robin Cohn, 1993. "Program Evaluators and Ethical Challenges," Evaluation Review, , vol. 17(6), pages 621-642, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:evarev:v:14:y:1990:i:1:p:100-107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.