IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v26y2001i11p991-1013.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potentials for electricity production from wood in Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • van den Broek, R
  • Teeuwisse, S
  • Healion, K
  • Kent, T
  • van Wijk, A
  • Faaij, A
  • Turkenburg, W

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emissions in Ireland are expected to be 25% higher in 2010 as compared to 1990, whereas Ireland's Kyoto commitment is a maximum rise of 13%. One of the measure taken to reduce this gap (about 7Mtonne CO2-eq.) could be the development of biomass based electricity production. This study focusses on various biomass resources and a range of conversion technologies, in order to select promising routes for biomass based electricity in the short term. This article extends previous analyses by: (i) including the use of forest residues and sawmill residues as potential biofuels; (ii) considering both co-firing in retrofitted existing peat stations and co-firing in the new to be built Europeat power plant; and (iii) including other promising conversion technologies to generate electricity from biomass. Although the potential for energy crops in Ireland could be large, their cost is relatively high, 4.7–8.2 GJ−1, dependent on the type of land used. Lower cost biomass can be obtained from currently unutilised forest residues. It was estimated that about 3.4PJ could be extracted from the forests at a cost of 2–3 GJ−1. The present market price of sawmill residues (in total about 7PJ) is 1.4–3.5 GJ−1. Three promising routes for electricity generation were selected: co-firing with peat in the new to be built Europeat power plant, small scale CHP generation with fixed bed gasifiers, and co-firing in the Moneypoint coal fired plant. Co-firing in the Europeat plant is the most attractive. The electricity production costs are 0.033–0.053 kW−1h−1 as compared to 0.041 kW−1h−1 for peat based electricity. Costs per avoided tonne of CO2 are between −7 and 12 . Electricity generation from wood could fill about 14% (about 1.0Mtonne CO2-eq.) of the Irish ‘Kyoto gap’.

Suggested Citation

  • van den Broek, R & Teeuwisse, S & Healion, K & Kent, T & van Wijk, A & Faaij, A & Turkenburg, W, 2001. "Potentials for electricity production from wood in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(11), pages 991-1013.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:26:y:2001:i:11:p:991-1013
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00050-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544201000500
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(01)00050-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastián, F. & Royo, J. & Gómez, M., 2011. "Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2029-2037.
    2. Takeshita, Takayuki, 2011. "Competitiveness, role, and impact of microalgal biodiesel in the global energy future," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(10), pages 3481-3491.
    3. Maung, Thein A. & McCarl, Bruce A., 2013. "Economic factors influencing potential use of cellulosic crop residues for electricity generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 81-91.
    4. Evans, Annette & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2010. "Sustainability considerations for electricity generation from biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(5), pages 1419-1427, June.
    5. Styles, David & Jones, Michael B., 2007. "Current and future financial competitiveness of electricity and heat from energy crops: A case study from Ireland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 4355-4367, August.
    6. Ćosić, Boris & Stanić, Zoran & Duić, Neven, 2011. "Geographic distribution of economic potential of agricultural and forest biomass residual for energy use: Case study Croatia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2017-2028.
    7. Sena, Kenton & Ochuodho, Thomas O. & Agyeman, Domena A. & Contreras, Marco & Niman, Chad & Eaton, Dan & Yang, Jian, 2022. "Wood bioenergy for rural energy resilience: Suitable site selection and potential economic impacts in Appalachian Kentucky," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Antar, Mohammed & Lyu, Dongmei & Nazari, Mahtab & Shah, Ateeq & Zhou, Xiaomin & Smith, Donald L., 2021. "Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    9. Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh & Day, Ken, 2014. "The effects of variations in supply accessibility and amount on the economics of using regional forest biomass for generating district heat," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 631-640.
    10. Styles, David & Jones, Michael B., 2008. "Miscanthus and willow heat production--An effective land-use strategy for greenhouse gas emission avoidance in Ireland?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 97-107, January.
    11. Everard, Colm D. & Finnan, John & McDonnell, Kevin P. & Schmidt, Martin, 2013. "Evaluation of self-heating in Miscanthus x giganteus energy crop clamps and the implications for harvesting time," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 350-356.
    12. Shabani, Nazanin & Akhtari, Shaghaygh & Sowlati, Taraneh, 2013. "Value chain optimization of forest biomass for bioenergy production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 299-311.
    13. Ren, Hongbo & Zhou, Weisheng & Nakagami, Ken'ichi & Gao, Weijun, 2010. "Integrated design and evaluation of biomass energy system taking into consideration demand side characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2210-2222.
    14. Andrée, Bo Pieter Johannes & Diogo, Vasco & Koomen, Eric, 2017. "Efficiency of second-generation biofuel crop subsidy schemes: Spatial heterogeneity and policy design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 848-862.
    15. Ignaciuk, Adriana M. & Dellink, Rob B., 2006. "Biomass and multi-product crops for agricultural and energy production--an AGE analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 308-325, May.
    16. van der Hilst, F. & Dornburg, V. & Sanders, J.P.M. & Elbersen, B. & Graves, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Elbersen, H.W. & van Dam, J.M.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2010. "Potential, spatial distribution and economic performance of regional biomass chains: The North of the Netherlands as example," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 403-417, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:26:y:2001:i:11:p:991-1013. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.