IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v25y2000i11p1119-1138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influence of the instantaneous fuel mix for electricity generation on the corresponding emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Voorspools, Kris R
  • D'haeseleer, William D

Abstract

Since it would be unwise to apply an environmental measure before its impact is estimated, tools are needed to simulate the system to which the measure is applied. In this paper, a tool and a methodology are discussed in order to simulate scenarios for demand and supply side options and to quantify the emissions and the energy use related to electricity generation. To supply the electricity demand, the composition of the active power system evidently changes with the variations in demand. The instantaneous composition of the power system is determined by the activation order (set by a chosen criterion) of all power plants. Because of their specific nature, some problems are dealt with separately in the model. Pumping plants are both customer (pump-mode) and provider (turbine-mode) of electric power. Therefore, they are not modeled as other plants, but as an adaptation in the demand pattern for other plants. Outages are mostly unpredictable but very important for the instantaneous energy use and emissions. Therefore, the model contains a component in which an average outage schedule can be calculated. The possible deviation of this average result is dealt with in the calculation of the uncertainties. Also, other parameters, like accidental unavailability of plants, human decisions in activation and deactivation of plants and the unpredictable availability of cogeneration units, are included in the calculation of the uncertainties.

Suggested Citation

  • Voorspools, Kris R & D'haeseleer, William D, 2000. "The influence of the instantaneous fuel mix for electricity generation on the corresponding emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 25(11), pages 1119-1138.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:25:y:2000:i:11:p:1119-1138
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00029-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544200000293
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(00)00029-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Voorspools, Kris R. & Brouwers, Els A. & D'haeseleer, William D., 2000. "Energy content and indirect greenhouse gas emissions embedded in [`]emission-free' power plants: results for the Low Countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 307-330, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Voorspools, Kris R. & D'haeseleer, William D., 2000. "An evaluation method for calculating the emission responsibility of specific electric applications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(13), pages 967-980, November.
    2. Dios, M. & Souto, J.A. & Casares, J.J., 2013. "Experimental development of CO2, SO2 and NOx emission factors for mixed lignite and subbituminous coal-fired power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 40-51.
    3. Haeseldonckx, Dries & Peeters, Leen & Helsen, Lieve & D'haeseleer, William, 2007. "The impact of thermal storage on the operational behaviour of residential CHP facilities and the overall CO2 emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(6), pages 1227-1243, August.
    4. Biéron, M. & Le Dréau, J. & Haas, B., 2023. "Assessment of the marginal technologies reacting to demand response events: A French case-study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    5. Psomopoulos, C.S. & Skoula, I. & Karras, C. & Chatzimpiros, A. & Chionidis, M., 2010. "Electricity savings and CO2 emissions reduction in buildings sector: How important the network losses are in the calculation?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 485-490.
    6. Hawkes, A.D., 2010. "Estimating marginal CO2 emissions rates for national electricity systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 5977-5987, October.
    7. Hasanuzzaman, M. & Rahim, N.A. & Saidur, R. & Kazi, S.N., 2011. "Energy savings and emissions reductions for rewinding and replacement of industrial motor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 233-240.
    8. Hawkes, A.D., 2014. "Long-run marginal CO2 emissions factors in national electricity systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 197-205.
    9. Luickx, Patrick J. & Helsen, Lieve M. & D'haeseleer, William D., 2008. "Influence of massive heat-pump introduction on the electricity-generation mix and the GHG effect: Comparison between Belgium, France, Germany and The Netherlands," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(8), pages 2140-2158, October.
    10. Howard, B. & Waite, M. & Modi, V., 2017. "Current and near-term GHG emissions factors from electricity production for New York State and New York City," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 255-271.
    11. Haeseldonckx, Dries & D'haeseleer, William, 2008. "The environmental impact of decentralised generation in an overall system context," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 437-454, February.
    12. Voorspools, Kris R. & D'haeseleer, William D., 2003. "Long-term Unit Commitment optimisation for large power systems: unit decommitment versus advanced priority listing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-3), pages 157-167, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioannidis, Romanos & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris, 2020. "A review of land use, visibility and public perception of renewable energy in the context of landscape impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    2. Savino, Matteo M. & Manzini, Riccardo & Della Selva, Vincenzo & Accorsi, Riccardo, 2017. "A new model for environmental and economic evaluation of renewable energy systems: The case of wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 739-752.
    3. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2008. "Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2940-2953, August.
    4. Turconi, Roberto & Boldrin, Alessio & Astrup, Thomas, 2013. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 555-565.
    5. Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus & Siu, Yim Ling & Li, Xin, 2014. "The energy and water nexus in Chinese electricity production: A hybrid life cycle analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 342-355.
    6. Evans, Annette & Strezov, Vladimir & Evans, Tim J., 2009. "Assessment of sustainability indicators for renewable energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 1082-1088, June.
    7. Pepermans, G. & Driesen, J. & Haeseldonckx, D. & Belmans, R. & D'haeseleer, W., 2005. "Distributed generation: definition, benefits and issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 787-798, April.
    8. Modahl, Ingunn Saur & Raadal, Hanne Lerche & Gagnon, Luc & Bakken, Tor Haakon, 2013. "How methodological issues affect the energy indicator results for different electricity generation technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 283-299.
    9. Carless, Travis S. & Griffin, W. Michael & Fischbeck, Paul S., 2016. "The environmental competitiveness of small modular reactors: A life cycle study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 84-99.
    10. Mohamed R. Gomaa & Hegazy Rezk & Ramadan J. Mustafa & Mujahed Al-Dhaifallah, 2019. "Evaluating the Environmental Impacts and Energy Performance of a Wind Farm System Utilizing the Life-Cycle Assessment Method: A Practical Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Osmani, Atif & Zhang, Jun & Gonela, Vinay & Awudu, Iddrisu, 2013. "Electricity generation from renewables in the United States: Resource potential, current usage, technical status, challenges, strategies, policies, and future directions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 454-472.
    12. Limmeechokchai, Bundit & Suksuntornsiri, Pawinee, 2007. "Embedded energy and total greenhouse gas emissions in final consumptions within Thailand," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 259-281, February.
    13. Mancarella, Pierluigi & Chicco, Gianfranco, 2009. "Global and local emission impact assessment of distributed cogeneration systems with partial-load models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(10), pages 2096-2106, October.
    14. Nicolas Sanchez & David Mays, 2015. "Effect of methane leakage on the greenhouse gas footprint of electricity generation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 169-178, November.
    15. Zhang, Yan & Zheng, Hongmei & Fath, Brian D., 2014. "Analysis of the energy metabolism of urban socioeconomic sectors and the associated carbon footprints: Model development and a case study for Beijing," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 540-551.
    16. Chan, Chien Aun & Gygax, André F. & Leckie, Christopher & Wong, Elaine & Nirmalathas, Ampalavanapillai & Hinton, Kerry, 2016. "Telecommunications energy and greenhouse gas emissions management for future network growth," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 174-185.
    17. Bishop, Justin D.K. & Amaratunga, Gehan A.J. & Rodriguez, Cuauhtemoc, 2008. "Using strong sustainability to optimize electricity generation fuel mixes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 971-980, March.
    18. Shahsavari, Amir & Akbari, Morteza, 2018. "Potential of solar energy in developing countries for reducing energy-related emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 275-291.
    19. Huaimo You & Hong Fang & Xu Wang & Siran Fang, 2018. "Environmental Efficiency of Photovoltaic Power Plants in China—A Comparative Study of Different Economic Zones and Plant Types," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Carla Oliveira Henriques & Dulce Helena Coelho & Maria Elisabete Duarte Neves, 2022. "Investment planning in energy efficiency programs: a portfolio based approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 615-649, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:25:y:2000:i:11:p:1119-1138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.