IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v239y2022ipbs0360544221023471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reducing forecasting error by optimally pooling wind energy generation sources through portfolio optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Han, Chanok
  • Vinel, Alexander

Abstract

Generation variability is generally accepted as one of the key challenges in enabling wider penetration of renewable energy sources in general, and wind energy in particular. It is widely documented that it is often possible to reduce the severity of generation intermittency by pooling together generation from geographically (or technologically) diverse sources. This paper aims at evaluating the potential for a similar approach targeted at addressing the related issue of limited predictability of wind energy generation. Specifically, a portfolio optimization model for intelligently constructing a wind energy portfolio for a given harvesting region with the goal of reducing the prediction error is proposed. The mathematical model, based on Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) optimization methodology, is used to evaluate potential improvement in (day ahead) generation predictability for a collection of locations in the USA. The study concludes that pooling indeed can significantly reduce wind energy generation forecasting error, with the effect largely dependent on the size of the harvesting region. Further, if advanced optimization techniques are used, it is possible to balance this reduction with average generation output. Consequently, the results imply that the positive effect of pooling diverse wind resources can be an important factor in planning for generation expansion projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Han, Chanok & Vinel, Alexander, 2022. "Reducing forecasting error by optimally pooling wind energy generation sources through portfolio optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544221023471
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221023471
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ren, Guorui & Liu, Jinfu & Wan, Jie & Guo, Yufeng & Yu, Daren & Liu, Jizhen, 2017. "Measurement and statistical analysis of wind speed intermittency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 632-643.
    2. Gersema, Gerke & Wozabal, David, 2018. "Risk-optimized pooling of intermittent renewable energy sources," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 217-230.
    3. Bianchi, Robert J. & Bornholt, Graham & Drew, Michael E. & Howard, Michael F., 2014. "Long-term U.S. infrastructure returns and portfolio selection," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 314-325.
    4. Shahriari, Mehdi & Blumsack, Seth, 2017. "Scaling of wind energy variability over space and time," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 572-585.
    5. Tan, Zhongfu & Wang, Guan & Ju, Liwei & Tan, Qingkun & Yang, Wenhai, 2017. "Application of CVaR risk aversion approach in the dynamical scheduling optimization model for virtual power plant connected with wind-photovoltaic-energy storage system with uncertainties and demand r," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 198-213.
    6. Moreno, Blanca & Díaz, Guzmán, 2019. "The impact of virtual power plant technology composition on wholesale electricity prices: A comparative study of some European Union electricity markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 100-108.
    7. Vinel, Alexander & Mortaz, Ebrahim, 2019. "Optimal pooling of renewable energy sources with a risk-averse approach: Implications for US energy portfolio," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 928-939.
    8. Handschy, Mark A. & Rose, Stephen & Apt, Jay, 2017. "Is it always windy somewhere? Occurrence of low-wind-power events over large areas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 1124-1130.
    9. Draxl, Caroline & Clifton, Andrew & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & McCaa, Jim, 2015. "The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 355-366.
    10. Katzenstein, Warren & Fertig, Emily & Apt, Jay, 2010. "The variability of interconnected wind plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4400-4410, August.
    11. Shahriari, Mehdi & Blumsack, Seth, 2018. "The capacity value of optimal wind and solar portfolios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 992-1005.
    12. Mauleón, Ignacio & Hamoudi, Hamid, 2017. "Photovoltaic and wind cost decrease estimation: Implications for investment analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1054-1065.
    13. Bett, Philip E. & Thornton, Hazel E., 2016. "The climatological relationships between wind and solar energy supply in Britain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 96-110.
    14. Larson, David P. & Nonnenmacher, Lukas & Coimbra, Carlos F.M., 2016. "Day-ahead forecasting of solar power output from photovoltaic plants in the American Southwest," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 11-20.
    15. Conor Sweeney & Ricardo J. Bessa & Jethro Browell & Pierre Pinson, 2020. "The future of forecasting for renewable energy," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(2), March.
    16. Rombauts, Yannick & Delarue, Erik & D’haeseleer, William, 2011. "Optimal portfolio-theory-based allocation of wind power: Taking into account cross-border transmission-capacity constraints," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2374-2387.
    17. Foley, Aoife M. & Leahy, Paul G. & Marvuglia, Antonino & McKeogh, Eamon J., 2012. "Current methods and advances in forecasting of wind power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-8.
    18. Huang, Junling & Lu, Xi & McElroy, Michael B., 2014. "Meteorologically defined limits to reduction in the variability of outputs from a coupled wind farm system in the Central US," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 331-340.
    19. Boomsma, Trine Krogh & Meade, Nigel & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2012. "Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 225-237.
    20. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    21. Sahin, Cem & Shahidehpour, Mohammad & Erkmen, Ismet, 2012. "Generation risk assessment in volatile conditions with wind, hydro, and natural gas units," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 4-11.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Asim Kumar Sarker & Abul Kalam Azad & Mohammad G. Rasul & Arun Teja Doppalapudi, 2023. "Prospect of Green Hydrogen Generation from Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Gyeongmin Kim & Jin Hur, 2021. "A Short-Term Power Output Forecasting Based on Augmented Naïve Bayes Classifiers for High Wind Power Penetrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-12, November.
    3. Kim, Gyeongmin & Hur, Jin, 2023. "A probabilistic approach to potential estimation of renewable energy resources based on augmented spatial interpolation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vinel, Alexander & Mortaz, Ebrahim, 2019. "Optimal pooling of renewable energy sources with a risk-averse approach: Implications for US energy portfolio," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 928-939.
    2. Shahriari, Mehdi & Blumsack, Seth, 2018. "The capacity value of optimal wind and solar portfolios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 992-1005.
    3. Lobato, E. & Doenges, K. & Egido, I. & Sigrist, L., 2020. "Limits to wind aggregation: Empirical assessment in the Spanish electricity system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1321-1330.
    4. Álvarez-García, Francisco J. & Fresno-Schmolk, Gonzalo & OrtizBevia, María J. & Cabos, William & RuizdeElvira, Antonio, 2020. "Reduction of aggregate wind power variability using Empirical Orthogonal Teleconnections: An application in the Iberian Peninsula," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 151-161.
    5. Yuan, Qiheng & Zhou, Keliang & Yao, Jing, 2020. "A new measure of wind power variability with implications for the optimal sizing of standalone wind power systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 538-549.
    6. Zhang, Chongyu & Lu, Xi & Ren, Guo & Chen, Shi & Hu, Chengyu & Kong, Zhaoyang & Zhang, Ning & Foley, Aoife M., 2021. "Optimal allocation of onshore wind power in China based on cluster analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    7. Pedro, Hugo T.C. & Lim, Edwin & Coimbra, Carlos F.M., 2018. "A database infrastructure to implement real-time solar and wind power generation intra-hour forecasts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 513-525.
    8. Yang, Mao & Wang, Da & Xu, Chuanyu & Dai, Bozhi & Ma, Miaomiao & Su, Xin, 2023. "Power transfer characteristics in fluctuation partition algorithm for wind speed and its application to wind power forecasting," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 582-594.
    9. Kroniger, Daniel & Madlener, Reinhard, 2014. "Hydrogen storage for wind parks: A real options evaluation for an optimal investment in more flexibility," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 931-946.
    10. Böhme, Gustavo S. & Fadigas, Eliane A. & Soares, Dorel & Gimenes, André L.V. & Macedo, Bruno C., 2020. "Wind speed variability and portfolio effect – A case study in the Brazilian market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    11. Hu, Jing & Harmsen, Robert & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Worrell, Ernst, 2019. "Geographical optimization of variable renewable energy capacity in China using modern portfolio theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    12. To, Thanh & Heleno, Miguel & Valenzuela, Alan, 2022. "Risk-constrained multi-period investment model for Distributed Energy Resources considering technology costs and regulatory uncertainties," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).
    13. Ian M. Trotter & Torjus F. Bolkesj{o} & Eirik O. J{aa}stad & Jon Gustav Kirkerud, 2021. "Increased Electrification of Heating and Weather Risk in the Nordic Power System," Papers 2112.02893, arXiv.org.
    14. Shahriari, M. & Cervone, G. & Clemente-Harding, L. & Delle Monache, L., 2020. "Using the analog ensemble method as a proxy measurement for wind power predictability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 789-801.
    15. Pérez Odeh, Rodrigo & Watts, David & Negrete-Pincetic, Matías, 2018. "Portfolio applications in electricity markets review: Private investor and manager perspective trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 192-204.
    16. Gu, Bo & Zhang, Tianren & Meng, Hang & Zhang, Jinhua, 2021. "Short-term forecasting and uncertainty analysis of wind power based on long short-term memory, cloud model and non-parametric kernel density estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 687-708.
    17. González-Sopeña, J.M. & Pakrashi, V. & Ghosh, B., 2021. "An overview of performance evaluation metrics for short-term statistical wind power forecasting," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Yu, Guangzheng & Liu, Chengquan & Tang, Bo & Chen, Rusi & Lu, Liu & Cui, Chaoyue & Hu, Yue & Shen, Lingxu & Muyeen, S.M., 2022. "Short term wind power prediction for regional wind farms based on spatial-temporal characteristic distribution," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 599-612.
    19. Alexis Tantet & Marc Stéfanon & Philippe Drobinski & Jordi Badosa & Silvia Concettini & Anna Cretì & Claudia D’Ambrosio & Dimitri Thomopulos & Peter Tankov, 2019. "e 4 clim 1.0: The Energy for a Climate Integrated Model: Description and Application to Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-37, November.
    20. Feng, Cong & Sun, Mucun & Cui, Mingjian & Chartan, Erol Kevin & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Zhang, Jie, 2019. "Characterizing forecastability of wind sites in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1352-1365.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:239:y:2022:i:pb:s0360544221023471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.