IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v20y1995i9p915-922.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide by increasing ocean alkalinity

Author

Listed:
  • Kheshgi, Haroon S.

Abstract

We present a preliminary analysis of a geoengineering option based on the intentional increase of ocean alkalinity to enhance marine storage of atmospheric CO2. Like all geoengineering techniques to limit climate change, with today's limited understandig of the climate system, this approach must be regarded as a potential strategic option that requires ongoing assessment to establish its potential benefits and side effecs. CO2 would be absorbed from the atmosphere by the oceans at an increased rate if ocean alkalinity were raised. Ocean alkalinity might be raised by introducing the dissolution products of alkaline minerals into the oceans. The limited deposits of naturally occurring soda ash (Na2CO3) are readily soluble and easily mined. Limestone (CaCO3) is abundant in the Earth's crust but is not readily soluble. This analysis explores the potential feasibility and limits of such approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Kheshgi, Haroon S., 1995. "Sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide by increasing ocean alkalinity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 20(9), pages 915-922.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:20:y:1995:i:9:p:915-922
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(95)00035-F
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/036054429500035F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(95)00035-F?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naomi Vaughan & Timothy Lenton, 2011. "A review of climate geoengineering proposals," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 745-790, December.
    2. Rau, Greg H. & Baird, Jim R., 2018. "Negative-CO2-emissions ocean thermal energy conversion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 265-272.
    3. Renforth, P. & Jenkins, B.G. & Kruger, T., 2013. "Engineering challenges of ocean liming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 442-452.
    4. Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Foo, Dominic C.Y. & Lee, Jui-Yuan & Ubando, Aristotle T., 2019. "Optimal synthesis of negative emissions polygeneration systems with desalination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Sarah Gore & Phil Renforth & Rupert Perkins, 2019. "The potential environmental response to increasing ocean alkalinity for negative emissions," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 1191-1211, October.
    6. Stefano Caserini & Beatriz Barreto & Caterina Lanfredi & Giovanni Cappello & Dennis Ross Morrey & Mario Grosso, 2019. "Affordable CO2 negative emission through hydrogen from biomass, ocean liming, and CO2 storage," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 1231-1248, October.
    7. Guo, Fuxing & Wang, Yanping & Zhu, Haoyong & Zhang, Chuangye & Sun, Haowei & Fang, Zhuling & Yang, Jing & Zhang, Linsen & Mu, Yan & Man, Yu Bon & Wu, Fuyong, 2023. "Crop productivity and soil inorganic carbon change mediated by enhanced rock weathering in farmland: A comparative field analysis of multi-agroclimatic regions in central China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    8. Hanak, Dawid P. & Jenkins, Barrie G. & Kruger, Tim & Manovic, Vasilije, 2017. "High-efficiency negative-carbon emission power generation from integrated solid-oxide fuel cell and calciner," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 1189-1201.
    9. Rob Swart & Natasha Marinova, 2010. "Policy options in a worst case climate change world," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(6), pages 531-549, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:20:y:1995:i:9:p:915-922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.