IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v172y2019icp232-242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the biochemical and thermochemical routes for bioenergy production: A techno-economic (TEA), energetic and environmental assessment

Author

Listed:
  • García-Velásquez, Carlos A.
  • Cardona, Carlos A.

Abstract

This paper addresses the techno-economic, energetic and environmental assessment of the indirect and direct production of bioenergy using Pinus patula (PP) as raw material. Ethanol and synthesis gas are evaluated as main products through biochemical (fermentation) and thermochemical (gasification) routes, respectively. The complete characterization of the raw material was performed aiming to determine the chemical, proximate and elemental composition of the PP that is used as starting point for the simulation procedure. Mass and energy balances were obtained from the simulation of both processes using the software Aspen Plus v9.0. Different economic criteria such as Net Present Value (NPV) and Payback Period (PBP) were used to determine the profitability of both processes. The overall energy efficiency was calculated considering the relation between the energy content of the products and the energy content of the inputs (raw materials and utilities). The environmental assessment involves an attributional life-cycle assessment (LCA) of different systems such as seedlings production, PP cultivation, harvesting and collection, and the evaluated processes using a cradle-to-gate approach. As a result, the production of ethanol evidenced a low production cost (0.549 USD/L), higher energy efficiency (45.1%) and higher CO2 emissions (0.17 kg per MJ EtOH) in comparison to the biomass gasification.

Suggested Citation

  • García-Velásquez, Carlos A. & Cardona, Carlos A., 2019. "Comparison of the biochemical and thermochemical routes for bioenergy production: A techno-economic (TEA), energetic and environmental assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 232-242.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:232-242
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219300751
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.073?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parascanu, M.M. & Sandoval-Salas, F. & Soreanu, G. & Valverde, J.L. & Sanchez-Silva, L., 2017. "Valorization of Mexican biomasses through pyrolysis, combustion and gasification processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 509-522.
    2. Udomsirichakorn, Jakkapong & Salam, P. Abdul, 2014. "Review of hydrogen-enriched gas production from steam gasification of biomass: The prospect of CaO-based chemical looping gasification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 565-579.
    3. Pellegrini, Luiz Felipe & de Oliveira, Silvio, 2007. "Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 314-327.
    4. Alauddin, Zainal Alimuddin Bin Zainal & Lahijani, Pooya & Mohammadi, Maedeh & Mohamed, Abdul Rahman, 2010. "Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass in fluidized beds for renewable energy development: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2852-2862, December.
    5. Morales, Marjorie & Quintero, Julián & Conejeros, Raúl & Aroca, Germán, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic bioethanol: Environmental impacts and energy balance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1349-1361.
    6. Sudiro, Maria & Bertucco, Alberto, 2009. "Production of synthetic gasoline and diesel fuel by alternative processes using natural gas and coal: Process simulation and optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 2206-2214.
    7. Ruiz, J.A. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & Muñoz, P. & Mendívil, M.A., 2013. "Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 174-183.
    8. Ajaree Suwatthikul & Siripong Limprachaya & Paisan Kittisupakorn & Iqbal Mohammed Mujtaba, 2017. "Simulation of Steam Gasification in a Fluidized Bed Reactor with Energy Self-Sufficient Condition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    9. Carolan Joseph E. & Joshi Satish V. & Dale Bruce E., 2007. "Technical and Financial Feasibility Analysis of Distributed Bioprocessing Using Regional Biomass Pre-Processing Centers," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-29, December.
    10. Baruah, Dipal & Baruah, D.C., 2014. "Modeling of biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 806-815.
    11. Monteiro, Eliseu & Ismail, Tamer M. & Ramos, Ana & Abd El-Salam, M. & Brito, Paulo & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Experimental and modeling studies of Portuguese peach stone gasification on an autothermal bubbling fluidized bed pilot plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 862-877.
    12. García, Carlos A. & Morales, Marjorie & Quintero, Julian & Aroca, Germán & Cardona, Carlos A., 2017. "Environmental assessment of hydrogen production based on Pinus patula plantations in Colombia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 606-616.
    13. Yılmaz Balaman, Şebnem & Wright, Daniel G. & Scott, James & Matopoulos, Aristides, 2018. "Network design and technology management for waste to energy production: An integrated optimization framework under the principles of circular economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 911-933.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Grzegórska & Piotr Rybarczyk & Valdas Lukoševičius & Joanna Sobczak & Andrzej Rogala, 2021. "Smart Asset Management for District Heating Systems in the Baltic Sea Region," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Salameh, Tareq & Tawalbeh, Muhammad & Al-Shannag, Mohammad & Saidan, Motasem & Melhem, Khalid Bani & Alkasrawi, Malek, 2020. "Energy saving in the process of bioethanol production from renewable paper mill sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Kargbo, Hannah & Harris, Jonathan Stuart & Phan, Anh N., 2021. "“Drop-in” fuel production from biomass: Critical review on techno-economic feasibility and sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Remston Martis & Amani Al-Othman & Muhammad Tawalbeh & Malek Alkasrawi, 2020. "Energy and Economic Analysis of Date Palm Biomass Feedstock for Biofuel Production in UAE: Pyrolysis, Gasification and Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-34, November.
    5. Lak Kamari, Mojtaba & Maleki, Akbar & Daneshpour, Raheleh & Rosen, Marc A. & Pourfayaz, Fathollah & Alhuyi Nazari, Mohammad, 2023. "Exergy, energy and environmental evaluation of a biomass-assisted integrated plant for multigeneration fed by various biomass sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PB).
    6. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Bagnato, Giuseppe & Boulet, Florent & Sanna, Aimaro, 2019. "Effect of Li-LSX zeolite, NiCe/Al2O3 and NiCe/ZrO2 on the production of drop-in bio-fuels by pyrolysis and hydrotreating of Nannochloropsis and isochrysis microalgae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 199-213.
    8. Li, Junjie & Zhang, Yueling & Yang, Yanli & Zhang, Xiaomei & Zheng, Yonghong & Qian, Qi & Tian, Yajun & Xie, Kechang, 2022. "Comparative resource-environment-economy assessment of coal- and oil-based aromatics production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    9. Li, Junjie & Zhang, Yueling & Yang, Yanli & Zhang, Xiaomei & Wang, Nana & Zheng, Yonghong & Tian, Yajun & Xie, Kechang, 2022. "Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of ethanol production via coal and its competitors: A comparative study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    10. Li, Junjie & Cheng, Wanjing, 2020. "Comparison of life-cycle energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic costs of coal to ethanol and bioethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    11. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & Chacón-Pérez, Yessica & Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Sara & Poveda Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro & Teixeira, José António & Moustakas, Konstantinos & Alzate, Carlos Ariel Cardona, 2020. "Effect of dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment on the physicochemical properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of coffee cut-stems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Poveda-Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro & Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & Cardona Alzate, Carlos Ariel, 2021. "The potential use of lignin as a platform product in biorefineries: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    13. Solarte-Toro, Juan Camilo & González-Aguirre, Jose Andrés & Poveda Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro & Cardona Alzate, Carlos A., 2021. "Thermochemical processing of woody biomass: A review focused on energy-driven applications and catalytic upgrading," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    2. Guan, Guoqing & Kaewpanha, Malinee & Hao, Xiaogang & Abudula, Abuliti, 2016. "Catalytic steam reforming of biomass tar: Prospects and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 450-461.
    3. Qitai Eri & Wenzhen Wu & Xinjun Zhao, 2017. "Numerical Investigation of the Air-Steam Biomass Gasification Process Based on Thermodynamic Equilibrium Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Silva, Valter & Rouboa, Abel, 2018. "Co-gasification and recent developments on waste-to-energy conversion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 380-398.
    5. Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Khalili, Maryam & Sharifzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Moftakhari, 2018. "Model development and energy and exergy analysis of the biomass gasification process (Based on the various biomass sources)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 869-887.
    6. Santa Margarida Santos & Ana Carolina Assis & Leandro Gomes & Catarina Nobre & Paulo Brito, 2022. "Waste Gasification Technologies: A Brief Overview," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Samiran, Nor Afzanizam & Jaafar, Mohammad Nazri Mohd & Ng, Jo-Han & Lam, Su Shiung & Chong, Cheng Tung, 2016. "Progress in biomass gasification technique – With focus on Malaysian palm biomass for syngas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1047-1062.
    8. Adnan, Muflih A. & Hossain, Mohammad M., 2018. "Gasification of various biomasses including microalgae using CO2 – A thermodynamic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 598-607.
    9. Copa Rey, José Ramón & Tamayo Pacheco, Jorge Jadid & António da Cruz Tarelho, Luís & Silva, Valter & Cardoso, João Sousa & Silveira, José Luz & Tuna, Celso Eduardo, 2021. "Evaluation of cogeneration alternative systems integrating biomass gasification applied to a Brazilian sugar industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 318-333.
    10. Liu, Haolin & Ye, Chao & Xu, Yousheng & Wang, Qisong, 2022. "Effect of activation conditions and iron loading content on the catalytic cracking of toluene by biochar," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    11. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    12. Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Kurnia, Jundika Candra & Shahbaz, Muhammad, 2019. "Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 252-267.
    13. Cortazar, M. & Lopez, G. & Alvarez, J. & Amutio, M. & Bilbao, J. & Olazar, M., 2018. "Advantages of confining the fountain in a conical spouted bed reactor for biomass steam gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 455-463.
    14. Ud Din, Zia & Zainal, Z.A., 2016. "Biomass integrated gasification–SOFC systems: Technology overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1356-1376.
    15. Rukshan Jayathilake & Souman Rudra, 2017. "Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Equivalence Ratio (ER) and Feedstock Particle Size on Birchwood Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    16. Susastriawan, A.A.P. & Saptoadi, Harwin & Purnomo,, 2017. "Small-scale downdraft gasifiers for biomass gasification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 989-1003.
    17. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, R.G. & Matos, M.A.A. & Frade, J.R. & Yaremchenko, A. & Mishra, G.S. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2018. "Low-cost catalysts for in-situ improvement of producer gas quality during direct gasification of biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 442-454.
    18. Kang, Shimin & Fu, Jinxia & Zhang, Gang, 2018. "From lignocellulosic biomass to levulinic acid: A review on acid-catalyzed hydrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 340-362.
    19. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Al-Ansari, Tareq & Inayat, Muddasser & Sulaiman, Shaharin A. & Parthasarathy, Prakash & McKay, Gordon, 2020. "A critical review on the influence of process parameters in catalytic co-gasification: Current performance and challenges for a future prospectus," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    20. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C., 2020. "Empirical and chemical equilibrium modelling for prediction of biomass gasification products in bubbling fluidized beds," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:172:y:2019:i:c:p:232-242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.