IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v158y2018icp383-395.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An interval-based stochastic dominance approach for decision making in forward contracts of electricity market

Author

Listed:
  • Jamshidi, Movahed
  • Kebriaei, Hamed
  • Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad-Kazem

Abstract

virtually, all decisions in financial markets are made in the presence of uncertainty. Stochastic dominance is a well-known concept that is broadly implemented for decision making under uncertainty. Thanks to the advantages of this approach, a decision maker is able to exploit available information related to uncertainties with stochastic nature. In this paper, to cope with the uncertainties in the procedure of decision making for forward contracts in an electricity market, a modified stochastic dominance approach is proposed. In the suggested framework, instead of considering a single value for desirable goal in each scenario of benchmark, a profit interval has been allocated to reflect the economic targets of decision maker. In the next step, the allocated profit interval is utilized for decision making problem in the stochastic dominance framework. In order to find the optimal profit profile in such a setting, a two level optimization structure is suggested. To this end, at the lower level of optimization, three different methods namely the prospect stochastic dominance, conditional value at risk (CvaR) and hypothesis testing are applied to find the optimal profit profiles for a number of benchmarks, those are stochastically generated in an interval around a pre-specified profit benchmark. In the upper level, the optimal profit profile is computed by using the Mean-CvaR method. To show the practical aspects and generalizability of our proposed approach, the methods are applied to two different cases, including a retailer and an electricity producer’s decision making problems to determine their involvement in the futures market by maximizing their expected profit over a given planning horizon, while controlling the risk of profit volatility in the electricity market, raised from the uncertainties in the spot market price and the consumer demand. The performance of suggested framework is evaluated through simulation results and relevant conclusions are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamshidi, Movahed & Kebriaei, Hamed & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohammad-Kazem, 2018. "An interval-based stochastic dominance approach for decision making in forward contracts of electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 383-395.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:158:y:2018:i:c:p:383-395
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218311150
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Escudero, Laureano F. & Garín, María Araceli & Merino, María & Pérez, Gloria, 2016. "On time stochastic dominance induced by mixed integer-linear recourse in multistage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 164-176.
    2. Tajeddini, Mohammad Amin & Rahimi-Kian, Ashkan & Soroudi, Alireza, 2014. "Risk averse optimal operation of a virtual power plant using two stage stochastic programming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 958-967.
    3. Conejo, Antonio J. & Contreras, Javier & Espinola, Rosa & Plazas, Miguel A., 2005. "Forecasting electricity prices for a day-ahead pool-based electric energy market," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 435-462.
    4. Charwand, Mansour & Gitizadeh, Mohsen & Siano, Pierluigi, 2017. "A new active portfolio risk management for an electricity retailer based on a drawdown risk preference," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 387-398.
    5. Dentcheva, Darinka & Martinez, Gabriela, 2012. "Two-stage stochastic optimization problems with stochastic ordering constraints on the recourse," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 1-8.
    6. Maria Teresa Vespucci & Marida Bertocchi & Laureano F. Escudero & Stefano Zigrino, 2013. "A risk averse stochastic optimization model for power generation capacity expansion," Working Papers (2013-) 1305_qum, University of Bergamo, Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative Methods.
    7. Feng, Zhen-Hua & Wei, Yi-Ming & Wang, Kai, 2012. "Estimating risk for the carbon market via extreme value theory: An empirical analysis of the EU ETS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 97-108.
    8. Alipour, Manijeh & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam & Zare, Kazem, 2014. "Stochastic risk-constrained short-term scheduling of industrial cogeneration systems in the presence of demand response programs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 393-404.
    9. Jammazi, Rania & Reboredo, Juan C., 2016. "Dependence and risk management in oil and stock markets. A wavelet-copula analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 866-888.
    10. Benjamin Armbruster & James Luedtke, 2015. "Models and formulations for multivariate dominance-constrained stochastic programs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 1-14, January.
    11. Kajal Chatterjee & Samarjit Kar, 2016. "Multi-criteria analysis of supply chain risk management using interval valued fuzzy TOPSIS," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(3), pages 474-499, September.
    12. Deng, Shi-Jie & Xu, Li, 2009. "Mean-risk efficient portfolio analysis of demand response and supply resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1523-1529.
    13. Levy, Haim & Wiener, Zvi, 1998. "Stochastic Dominance and Prospect Dominance with Subjective Weighting Functions," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 147-163, May-June.
    14. Rockafellar, R. Tyrrell & Uryasev, Stanislav, 2002. "Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1443-1471, July.
    15. Miguel Carrión & Uwe Gotzes & Rüdiger Schultz, 2009. "Risk aversion for an electricity retailer with second-order stochastic dominance constraints," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 233-250, May.
    16. Jitka Dupačová & Miloš Kopa, 2012. "Robustness in stochastic programs with risk constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 200(1), pages 55-74, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Domínguez, Ruth & Vitali, Sebastiano & Carrión, Miguel & Moriggia, Vittorio, 2021. "Analysing decarbonizing strategies in the European power system applying stochastic dominance constraints," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. O'Connell, Sarah & Reynders, Glenn & Keane, Marcus M., 2021. "Impact of source variability on flexibility for demand response," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojia Guo & Alexandros Beskos & Afzal Siddiqui, 2016. "The natural hedge of a gas-fired power plant," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 63-86, January.
    2. Miloš Kopa & Vittorio Moriggia & Sebastiano Vitali, 2018. "Individual optimal pension allocation under stochastic dominance constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 260(1), pages 255-291, January.
    3. Giovanni Masala & Filippo Petroni, 2023. "Drawdown risk measures for asset portfolios with high frequency data," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 265-289, June.
    4. Darinka Dentcheva & Gabriela Martinez & Eli Wolfhagen, 2016. "Augmented Lagrangian Methods for Solving Optimization Problems with Stochastic-Order Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1451-1465, December.
    5. Adam Krzemienowski, 2009. "Risk preference modeling with conditional average: an application to portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 67-95, January.
    6. Jing Qiu & Junhua Zhao & Dongxiao Wang & Yu Zheng, 2017. "Two-Stage Coordinated Operational Strategy for Distributed Energy Resources Considering Wind Power Curtailment Penalty Cost," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Paulino Martinez-Fernandez & Fernando deLlano-Paz & Anxo Calvo-Silvosa & Isabel Soares, 2019. "Assessing Renewable Energy Sources for Electricity (RES-E) Potential Using a CAPM-Analogous Multi-Stage Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Dimitris Andriosopoulos & Michalis Doumpos & Panos M. Pardalos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2019. "Computational approaches and data analytics in financial services: A literature review," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(10), pages 1581-1599, October.
    9. Alipour, Manijeh & Zare, Kazem & Seyedi, Heresh & Jalali, Mehdi, 2019. "Real-time price-based demand response model for combined heat and power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1119-1127.
    10. Yu Mei & Zhiping Chen & Jia Liu & Bingbing Ji, 2022. "Multi-stage portfolio selection problem with dynamic stochastic dominance constraints," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 83(3), pages 585-613, July.
    11. Escudero Bueno, Laureano F. & Garín Martín, María Araceli & Merino Maestre, María & Pérez Sainz de Rozas, Gloria, 2015. "Some experiments on solving multistage stochastic mixed 0-1 programs with time stochastic dominance constraints," BILTOKI 1134-8984, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística).
    12. Herrera, Rodrigo & González, Nicolás, 2014. "The modeling and forecasting of extreme events in electricity spot markets," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 477-490.
    13. František Zapletal & Martin Šmíd & Miloš Kopa, 2020. "Multi-stage emissions management of a steel company," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 292(2), pages 735-751, September.
    14. Chai, Shanglei & Zhou, P., 2018. "The Minimum-CVaR strategy with semi-parametric estimation in carbon market hedging problems," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 64-75.
    15. Miloš Kopa & Tomáš Rusý, 2021. "A decision-dependent randomness stochastic program for asset–liability management model with a pricing decision," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 299(1), pages 241-271, April.
    16. Domínguez, Ruth & Vitali, Sebastiano & Carrión, Miguel & Moriggia, Vittorio, 2021. "Analysing decarbonizing strategies in the European power system applying stochastic dominance constraints," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Laureano F. Escudero & Juan F. Monge, 2018. "On capacity expansion planning under strategic and operational uncertainties based on stochastic dominance risk averse management," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 479-500, October.
    18. Escudero, Laureano F. & Garín, María Araceli & Merino, María & Pérez, Gloria, 2016. "On time stochastic dominance induced by mixed integer-linear recourse in multistage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 164-176.
    19. Ma, Yilin & Wang, Yudong & Wang, Weizhong & Zhang, Chong, 2023. "Portfolios with return and volatility prediction for the energy stock market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    20. Mena, Rodrigo & Hennebel, Martin & Li, Yan-Fu & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "A multi-objective optimization framework for risk-controlled integration of renewable generation into electric power systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 712-727.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:158:y:2018:i:c:p:383-395. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.