IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v148y2018icp1181-1190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction and verification of risk loss cost for improved natural gas network layout optimization

Author

Listed:
  • An, Jinyu
  • Peng, Shini

Abstract

Natural gas pipelines play a key role in the transmission and distribution of natural gas, and reliable optimization of the pipeline network can lead to safe and guaranteed gas transmission to individuals with minimum risk loss and effective cost. Therefore, we developed an improved layout optimization procedure and applied a new prediction method, the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method, which is based on entropy weight and backpropagation (BP) neural network (NN). We used it to comprehensively calculate risk loss cost to achieve improved layout during the planning stage and used it to determine the initial risk loss cost. We verified the procedure using a genetic algorithm (GA) for two different layouts, one of which is the improved optimum layout and the other the conventional optimal layout. Finally, the optimized results of four different layouts were determined and the total cost of the new layout is 9.79% and 8.49% less than that of the two conventional layouts. This shows that the new prediction method of risk loss cost provides an efficient and effective means of synchronizing risk loss cost and total cost during the layout planning stage for natural gas transmission network.

Suggested Citation

  • An, Jinyu & Peng, Shini, 2018. "Prediction and verification of risk loss cost for improved natural gas network layout optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1181-1190.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:148:y:2018:i:c:p:1181-1190
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218301713
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.143?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Mohd Shariq & Lee, Moonyong, 2013. "Design optimization of single mixed refrigerant natural gas liquefaction process using the particle swarm paradigm with nonlinear constraints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 146-155.
    2. Sanchez-Ubeda, Eugenio Fco. & Berzosa, Ana, 2007. "Modeling and forecasting industrial end-use natural gas consumption," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 710-742, July.
    3. Ríos-Mercado, Roger Z. & Borraz-Sánchez, Conrado, 2015. "Optimization problems in natural gas transportation systems: A state-of-the-art review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 536-555.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mihai Daniel Roman & Diana Mihaela Stanculescu, 2021. "An Analysis of Countries’ Bargaining Power Derived from the Natural Gas Transportation System Using a Cooperative Game Theory Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Ghorbani, Bahram & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ghasemzadeh, Hossein, 2018. "Investigation of a hybrid water desalination, oxy-fuel power generation and CO2 liquefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1105-1119.
    3. Daniel de Wolf, 2017. "Mathematical Properties of Formulations of the Gas Transmission Problem," Post-Print halshs-02396747, HAL.
    4. Robertas Alzbutas & Tomas Iešmantas, 2022. "Stochastic Simulation of Flow Rate and Power Consumption Considering the Uncertainty of Pipeline Cracking Rate and Time-Dependent Topology of a Natural Gas Transmission Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Meira, Erick & Cyrino Oliveira, Fernando Luiz & de Menezes, Lilian M., 2022. "Forecasting natural gas consumption using Bagging and modified regularization techniques," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Yu, Taejong & Kim, Donghoi & Gundersen, Truls & Lim, Youngsub, 2023. "A feasibility study of HFO refrigerants for onboard BOG liquefaction processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    7. Xu, Xiongwen & Liu, Jinping & Cao, Le & Pang, Weiqiang, 2014. "Automatically varying the composition of a mixed refrigerant solution for single mixed refrigerant LNG (liquefied natural gas) process at changing working conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 931-941.
    8. Li, Wei & Lu, Can, 2019. "The multiple effectiveness of state natural gas consumption constraint policies for achieving sustainable development targets in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 685-698.
    9. Szoplik, Jolanta, 2015. "Forecasting of natural gas consumption with artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 208-220.
    10. Beyca, Omer Faruk & Ervural, Beyzanur Cayir & Tatoglu, Ekrem & Ozuyar, Pinar Gokcin & Zaim, Selim, 2019. "Using machine learning tools for forecasting natural gas consumption in the province of Istanbul," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 937-949.
    11. Askarzadeh, Alireza, 2014. "Comparison of particle swarm optimization and other metaheuristics on electricity demand estimation: A case study of Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 484-491.
    12. Peñasco, Cristina & del Río, Pablo & Romero-Jordán, Desiderio, 2017. "Gas and electricity demand in Spanish manufacturing industries: An analysis using homogeneous and heterogeneous estimators," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 45-60.
    13. Potočnik, Primož & Soldo, Božidar & Šimunović, Goran & Šarić, Tomislav & Jeromen, Andrej & Govekar, Edvard, 2014. "Comparison of static and adaptive models for short-term residential natural gas forecasting in Croatia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 94-103.
    14. Ahmet Goncu & Mehmet Oguz Karahan & Tolga Umut Kuzubas, 2019. "Forecasting Daily Residential Natural Gas Consumption: A Dynamic Temperature Modelling Approach," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22.
    15. Fazlollahi, Farhad & Bown, Alex & Ebrahimzadeh, Edris & Baxter, Larry L., 2015. "Design and analysis of the natural gas liquefaction optimization process- CCC-ES (energy storage of cryogenic carbon capture)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 244-257.
    16. Mustafa Akpinar & Nejat Yumusak, 2016. "Year Ahead Demand Forecast of City Natural Gas Using Seasonal Time Series Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Muhammad Abdul Qyyum & Yus Donald Chaniago & Wahid Ali & Hammad Saulat & Moonyong Lee, 2020. "Membrane-Assisted Removal of Hydrogen and Nitrogen from Synthetic Natural Gas for Energy-Efficient Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Brabec, Marek & Konár, Ondrej & Pelikán, Emil & Malý, Marek, 2008. "A nonlinear mixed effects model for the prediction of natural gas consumption by individual customers," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 659-678.
    19. Santos, Lucas F. & Costa, Caliane B.B. & Caballero, José A. & Ravagnani, Mauro A.S.S., 2022. "Framework for embedding black-box simulation into mathematical programming via kriging surrogate model applied to natural gas liquefaction process optimization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    20. Bartłomiej Gaweł & Andrzej Paliński, 2021. "Long-Term Natural Gas Consumption Forecasting Based on Analog Method and Fuzzy Decision Tree," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:148:y:2018:i:c:p:1181-1190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.