IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v75y2018icp336-344.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wind power bidding strategy in the short-term electricity market

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Shaomao
  • Park, Chan S.

Abstract

This paper presents an analytical trading electricity model for wind power producers (WPPs) in the short-term electricity market in the U.S. This model addresses four specific uncertainties: real-time (RT) wind power generation, day-ahead (DA) locational marginal prices (LMPs), RT LMPs, and deviation penalty rates. The model is designed to find the optimal bidding strategy to maximize the expected revenue under these uncertainties. In addition, this paper shows that advanced forecasting techniques could be used with the proposed bidding strategy to help WPPs trade energy in short-term markets. A case study is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of this proposed bidding strategy and advanced forecasting techniques using a set of real data taken from a wind farm in the PJM electricity market.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Shaomao & Park, Chan S., 2018. "Wind power bidding strategy in the short-term electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 336-344.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:336-344
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988318303591
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haifeng Zhang & Feng Gao & Jiang Wu & Kun Liu & Xiaolin Liu, 2012. "Optimal Bidding Strategies for Wind Power Producers in the Day-ahead Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Vilim, Michael & Botterud, Audun, 2014. "Wind power bidding in electricity markets with high wind penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 141-155.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiakai Hu & Chuanwen Jiang & Yangyang Liu, 2019. "Short-Term Bidding Strategy for a Price-Maker Virtual Power Plant Based on Interval Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Shojaabadi, Saeed & Talavat, Vahid & Galvani, Sadjad, 2022. "A game theory-based price bidding strategy for electric vehicle aggregators in the presence of wind power producers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 407-417.
    3. Serafin, Tomasz & Marcjasz, Grzegorz & Weron, Rafał, 2022. "Trading on short-term path forecasts of intraday electricity prices," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Liu, Tingting & Chen, Zhe & Xu, Jiuping, 2022. "Empirical evidence based effectiveness assessment of policy regimes for wind power development in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Endemaño-Ventura, Lázaro & Serrano González, Javier & Roldán Fernández, Juan Manuel & Burgos Payán, Manuel & Riquelme Santos, Jesús Manuel, 2021. "Optimal energy bidding for renewable plants: A practical application to an actual wind farm in Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1111-1126.
    6. Kenis, Michiel & Höschle, Hanspeter & Bruninx, Kenneth, 2022. "Strategic bidding of wind power producers in electricity markets in presence of information sharing," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Shinji Kuno & Kenji Tanaka & Yuji Yamada, 2022. "Effectiveness and Feasibility of Market Makers for P2P Electricity Trading," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    8. Mohammad Nure Alam, 2021. "Accessing the Effect of Renewables on the Wholesale Power Market," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(2), pages 341-360.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mazaher Haji Bashi & Gholamreza Yousefi & Claus Leth Bak & Jayakrishnan Radhakrishna Pillai, 2016. "Long Term Expected Revenue of Wind Farms Considering the Bidding Admission Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Hosseini, Seyyed Ahmad & Toubeau, Jean-François & De Grève, Zacharie & Vallée, François, 2020. "An advanced day-ahead bidding strategy for wind power producers considering confidence level on the real-time reserve provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. Chang-Gi Min & Jong Keun Park & Don Hur & Mun-Kyeom Kim, 2015. "The Economic Viability of Renewable Portfolio Standard Support for Offshore Wind Farm Projects in Korea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Hans Ole Riddervold & Ellen Krohn Aasg{aa}rd & Lisa Haukaas & Magnus Korp{aa}s, 2021. "Internal hydro- and wind portfolio optimisation in real-time market operations," Papers 2102.10098, arXiv.org.
    5. Riddervold, Hans Ole & Aasgård, Ellen Krohn & Haukaas, Lisa & Korpås, Magnus, 2021. "Internal hydro- and wind portfolio optimisation in real-time market operations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 675-687.
    6. Sergey Voronin & Jarmo Partanen, 2013. "Price Forecasting in the Day-Ahead Energy Market by an Iterative Method with Separate Normal Price and Price Spike Frameworks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Suomalainen, Kiti & Pritchard, Geoffrey & Sharp, Basil & Yuan, Ziqi & Zakeri, Golbon, 2015. "Correlation analysis on wind and hydro resources with electricity demand and prices in New Zealand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 445-462.
    8. Huiru Zhao & Yuwei Wang & Mingrui Zhao & Qingkun Tan & Sen Guo, 2017. "Day-Ahead Market Modeling for Strategic Wind Power Producers under Robust Market Clearing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    9. González-Aparicio, I. & Zucker, A., 2015. "Impact of wind power uncertainty forecasting on the market integration of wind energy in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 334-349.
    10. Klyve, Øyvind Sommer & Klæboe, Gro & Nygård, Magnus Moe & Marstein, Erik Stensrud, 2023. "Limiting imbalance settlement costs from variable renewable energy sources in the Nordics: Internal balancing vs. balancing market participation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    11. Ji, Ling & Huang, Guo-He & Huang, Lu-Cheng & Xie, Yu-Lei & Niu, Dong-Xiao, 2016. "Inexact stochastic risk-aversion optimal day-ahead dispatch model for electricity system management with wind power under uncertainty," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 920-932.
    12. Gro Klæboe & Jørgen Braathen & Anders Lund Eriksrud & Stein-Erik Fleten, 2022. "Day-ahead market bidding taking the balancing power market into account," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 683-703, October.
    13. Wang, Di & Zhang, Zhiyuan & Yang, Xiaodi & Zhang, Yanfang & Li, Yuman & Zhao, Yueying, 2021. "Multi-scenario simulation on the impact of China's electricity bidding policy based on complex networks model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    14. Perica Ilak & Slavko Krajcar & Ivan Rajšl & Marko Delimar, 2014. "Pricing Energy and Ancillary Services in a Day-Ahead Market for a Price-Taker Hydro Generating Company Using a Risk-Constrained Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Perica Ilak & Ivan Rajšl & Josip Đaković & Marko Delimar, 2018. "Duality Based Risk Mitigation Method for Construction of Joint Hydro-Wind Coordination Short-Run Marginal Cost Curves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Spodniak, Petr & Ollikka, Kimmo & Honkapuro, Samuli, 2019. "The Relevance of Wholesale Electricity Market Places: The Nordic Case," Working Papers 126, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    17. Meng Xiong & Feng Gao & Kun Liu & Siyun Chen & Jiaojiao Dong, 2015. "Optimal Real-Time Scheduling for Hybrid Energy Storage Systems and Wind Farms Based on Model Predictive Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-32, August.
    18. Xiao, Yunpeng & Wang, Xifan & Wang, Xiuli & Wu, Zechen, 2016. "Trading wind power with barrier option," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 232-242.
    19. Spodniak, Petr & Ollikka, Kimmo & Honkapuro, Samuli, 2021. "The impact of wind power and electricity demand on the relevance of different short-term electricity markets: The Nordic case," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    20. Exizidis, Lazaros & Kazempour, S. Jalal & Pinson, Pierre & de Greve, Zacharie & Vallée, François, 2016. "Sharing wind power forecasts in electricity markets: A numerical analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 65-73.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wind power; Bidding strategy; Forecasting model; Short-term market; Analytical method;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q40 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - General
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q47 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Energy Forecasting
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:336-344. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.