IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v282y2020i3p1025-1037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fuzzy cooperative game theoretic approach for multinational water resource spatiotemporal allocation

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Dehai
  • Ji, Xiaoxian
  • Tang, Jiafu
  • Li, Hongyi

Abstract

Water resource allocation in multinational river basins has been a major concern for all riparian countries. From the perspective of cooperative and sustainable water resource development, considering the spatiotemporal characteristics of the water demand, namely, the priority of water use due to the geographic location of each riparian country, the seasonality of water demand, and the differences in the net utility of water utilization, this paper constructs a fuzzy coalition game model for multinational water resource allocation and provides the optimal allocation strategy using the example of the Lancang-Mekong River. The study indicates that considering the geographic locations and the differences in the water utility of each country compared with the initial allocation strategy based on agricultural water demand, the cooperative strategy increases the allocated water resources in high-utility countries (expect countries near the estuary) and the overall water utility in the entire basin. Then, considering the seasonality of the water resource reallocation, the fuzzy coalition among riparian countries further increases the net water utility of each country and achieves the optimal allocation. As the preconditions for the establishment of cooperative relationships, upstream countries need to transfer partial water rights to downstream countries in certain seasons. The basic idea that is presented in this paper, the fuzzy coalition model of water resource allocation with spaciotemporal constraints, can be applied to the water allocation of other multinational rivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Dehai & Ji, Xiaoxian & Tang, Jiafu & Li, Hongyi, 2020. "A fuzzy cooperative game theoretic approach for multinational water resource spatiotemporal allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1025-1037.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:282:y:2020:i:3:p:1025-1037
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221719308537
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.10.018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mingming Leng & Mahmut Parlar, 2009. "Allocation of Cost Savings in a Three-Level Supply Chain with Demand Information Sharing: A Cooperative-Game Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 200-213, February.
    2. Casajus, André & Huettner, Frank, 2014. "On a class of solidarity values," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 583-591.
    3. Tsurumi, Masayo & Tanino, Tetsuzo & Inuiguchi, Masahiro, 2001. "A Shapley function on a class of cooperative fuzzy games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 596-618, March.
    4. Wang, Lizhong & Fang, Liping & Hipel, Keith W., 2008. "Basin-wide cooperative water resources allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(3), pages 798-817, November.
    5. Xin Chen & Jiawei Zhang, 2009. "A Stochastic Programming Duality Approach to Inventory Centralization Games," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 840-851, August.
    6. Undp, 2006. "HDR 2006 - Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis," Human Development Report (1990 to present), Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), number hdr2006, September.
    7. Kamijo, Yoshio & Kongo, Takumi, 2012. "Whose deletion does not affect your payoff? The difference between the Shapley value, the egalitarian value, the solidarity value, and the Banzhaf value," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(3), pages 638-646.
    8. Yoshio Kamijo & Takumi Kongo, 2010. "Axiomatization of the Shapley value using the balanced cycle contributions property," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 39(4), pages 563-571, October.
    9. Karl Michael Ortmann, 2016. "Fair allocation of capital growth," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 181-196, July.
    10. Li, Shujin & Zhang, Qiang, 2009. "A simplified expression of the Shapley function for fuzzy game," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 234-245, July.
    11. Guillermo Owen, 1975. "Multilinear extensions and the banzhaf value," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 741-750, December.
    12. Dagmawi Mulugeta Degefu & Weijun He, 2016. "Allocating Water under Bankruptcy Scenario," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(11), pages 3949-3964, September.
    13. Mehmet Kucukmehmetoglu & Abdurrahman Geymen, 2014. "Transboundary Water Resources Allocation under Various Parametric Conditions: The Case of the Euphrates & Tigris River Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(11), pages 3515-3538, September.
    14. Nowak, Andrzej S & Radzik, Tadeusz, 1994. "A Solidarity Value for n-Person Transferable Utility Games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 23(1), pages 43-48.
    15. Özlem Ergun & Luyi Gui & Jessica L. Heier Stamm & Pinar Keskinocak & Julie Swann, 2014. "Improving Humanitarian Operations through Technology-Enabled Collaboration," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(6), pages 1002-1014, June.
    16. Butnariu, Dan & Kroupa, Tomas, 2008. "Shapley mappings and the cumulative value for n-person games with fuzzy coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 288-299, April.
    17. Mojtaba Sadegh & Najmeh Mahjouri & Reza Kerachian, 2010. "Optimal Inter-Basin Water Allocation Using Crisp and Fuzzy Shapley Games," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(10), pages 2291-2310, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiting Zuo & Yixuan Diao & Lingang Hao & Chunhui Han, 2020. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the Human-Water Harmony Relationship in Countries Along the “Belt and Road”," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(13), pages 4019-4035, October.
    2. Sedakov, Artem & Qiao, Han & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "A model of river pollution as a dynamic game with network externalities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(3), pages 1136-1153.
    3. Danyang Di & Qi Shi & Zening Wu & Huiliang Wang, 2023. "Sustainable Management and Environmental Protection for Basin Water Allocation: Differential Game-based Multiobjective Programming," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Wenyuan Jiang & Zhenxiang Zeng & Zhengyun Zhang & Yichen Zhao, 2022. "Regulation and Optimization of Urban Water and Land Resources Utilization for Low Carbon Development: A Case Study of Tianjin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Gusev, Vasily V., 2021. "Nash-stable coalition partition and potential functions in games with coalition structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1180-1188.
    6. Davila-Pena, Laura & García-Jurado, Ignacio & Casas-Méndez, Balbina, 2022. "Assessment of the influence of features on a classification problem: An application to COVID-19 patients," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 631-641.
    7. Sebastian Cano-Berlanga & María-José Solís-Baltodano & Cori Vilella, 2023. "The Art of Sharing Resources: How to Distribute Water during a Drought Period," Games, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Boyang Dai & Xiangfeng Yang & Xiaoyue Liu, 2022. "Shapley Value of Uncertain Coalitional Game based on Hurwicz Criterion with Application to Water Resource Allocation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 241-260, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mojtaba Sadegh & Najmeh Mahjouri & Reza Kerachian, 2010. "Optimal Inter-Basin Water Allocation Using Crisp and Fuzzy Shapley Games," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(10), pages 2291-2310, August.
    2. Mojtaba Sadegh & Reza Kerachian, 2011. "Water Resources Allocation Using Solution Concepts of Fuzzy Cooperative Games: Fuzzy Least Core and Fuzzy Weak Least Core," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(10), pages 2543-2573, August.
    3. Béal, Sylvain & Rémila, Eric & Solal, Philippe, 2015. "Preserving or removing special players: What keeps your payoff unchanged in TU-games?," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 23-31.
    4. Casajus, André & Huettner, Frank, 2014. "On a class of solidarity values," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(2), pages 583-591.
    5. Fanyong Meng & Qiang Zhang & Xiaohong Chen, 2017. "Fuzzy Multichoice Games with Fuzzy Characteristic Functions," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 565-595, May.
    6. van den Brink, René & González-Arangüena, Enrique & Manuel, Conrado & del Pozo, Mónica, 2014. "Order monotonic solutions for generalized characteristic functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(3), pages 786-796.
    7. Borkotokey, Surajit & Choudhury, Dhrubajit & Gogoi, Loyimee & Kumar, Rajnish, 2020. "Group contributions in TU-games: A class of k-lateral Shapley values," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(2), pages 637-648.
    8. Yokote, Koji & Kongo, Takumi & Funaki, Yukihiko, 2018. "The balanced contributions property for equal contributors," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 113-124.
    9. Casajus, André & Huettner, Frank, 2014. "Null, nullifying, or dummifying players: The difference between the Shapley value, the equal division value, and the equal surplus division value," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 167-169.
    10. Koji Yokote & Takumi Kongo & Yukihiko Funaki, 2019. "Relationally equal treatment of equals and affine combinations of values for TU games," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(2), pages 197-212, August.
    11. Armaghan Abed-Elmdoust & Reza Kerachian, 2012. "Water Resources Allocation Using a Cooperative Game with Fuzzy Payoffs and Fuzzy Coalitions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(13), pages 3961-3976, October.
    12. Fanyong Meng & Xiaohong Chen & Chunqiao Tan, 2016. "Cooperative fuzzy games with interval characteristic functions," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Gutiérrez-López, Esther, 2020. "Axiomatic characterizations of the egalitarian solidarity values," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 109-115.
    14. Hsien-Chung Wu, 2019. "Cores and dominance cores of cooperative games endowed with fuzzy payoffs," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 219-257, June.
    15. Casajus, André & Huettner, Frank, 2014. "Weakly monotonic solutions for cooperative games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 162-172.
    16. Béal, Sylvain & Ferrières, Sylvain & Rémila, Eric & Solal, Philippe, 2016. "Axiomatic characterizations under players nullification," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 47-57.
    17. Calvo, Emilio & Gutiérrez-López, Esther, 2021. "Recursive and bargaining values," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 97-106.
    18. Sylvain Béal & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2017. "Axiomatization and implementation of a class of solidarity values for TU-games," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 61-94, June.
    19. Lee, Joosung & Driessen, Theo S.H., 2012. "Sequentially two-leveled egalitarianism for TU games: Characterization and application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 736-743.
    20. Sylvain Béal & Eric Rémila & Philippe Solal, 2015. "A Class of Solidarity Allocation Rules for TU-games," Working Papers 2015-03, CRESE.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:282:y:2020:i:3:p:1025-1037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.