IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v149y2003i1p17-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of two reference point methods in multiple objective mathematical programming

Author

Listed:
  • Buchanan, John
  • Gardiner, Lorraine

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Buchanan, John & Gardiner, Lorraine, 2003. "A comparison of two reference point methods in multiple objective mathematical programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 17-34, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:149:y:2003:i:1:p:17-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(02)00487-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buchanan, J. T. & Daellenbach, H. G., 1987. "A comparative evaluation of interactive solution methods for multiple objective decision models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 353-359, June.
    2. Wojtek Michalowski & Tomek Szapiro, 1992. "A Bi-Reference Procedure for Interactive Multiple Criteria Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 247-258, April.
    3. Ralph E. Steuer & Joe Silverman & Alan W. Whisman, 1993. "A Combined Tchebycheff/Aspiration Criterion Vector Interactive Multiobjective Programming Procedure," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(10), pages 1255-1260, October.
    4. Pekka Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 1988. "A pareto race," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 615-623, December.
    5. Downing, C. E. & Ringuest, J. L., 1998. "An experimental evaluation of the efficacy of four multi-objective linear programming algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 549-558, February.
    6. Lai, Young-Jou & Liu, Ting-Yun & Hwang, Ching-Lai, 1994. "TOPSIS for MODM," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(3), pages 486-500, August.
    7. Corner, J. L. & Buchanan, J. T., 1997. "Capturing decision maker preference: Experimental comparison of decision analysis and MCDM techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 85-97, April.
    8. Stanley Zionts & Jyrki Wallenius, 1976. "An Interactive Programming Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 652-663, February.
    9. Seymour Kaplan, 1974. "Application of Programs with Maximin Objective Functions to Problems of Optimal Resource Allocation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 802-807, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Refail Kasimbeyli, 2013. "A conic scalarization method in multi-objective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 279-297, June.
    2. Luque, M. & Marcenaro-Gutiérrez, O.D. & López-Agudo, L.A., 2015. "On the potential balance among compulsory education outcomes through econometric and multiobjective programming analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(2), pages 527-540.
    3. Despotis, Dimitris K. & Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris, 2016. "The “weak-link” approach to network DEA for two-stage processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 481-492.
    4. Pinto, F.S. & Figueira, J.R. & Marques, R.C., 2015. "A multi-objective approach with soft constraints for water supply and wastewater coverage improvements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 609-618.
    5. Ustun, Ozden & DemI[dot above]rtas, Ezgi Aktar, 2008. "An integrated multi-objective decision-making process for multi-period lot-sizing with supplier selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 509-521, August.
    6. Miettinen, Kaisa & Makela, Marko M. & Kaario, Katja, 2006. "Experiments with classification-based scalarizing functions in interactive multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 931-947, December.
    7. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 373-386, August.
    8. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K., 2019. "Reformulation of Network Data Envelopment Analysis models using a common modelling framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 472-480.
    9. Luigi Di Puglia Pugliese & Francesca Guerriero, 2013. "A Reference Point Approach for the Resource Constrained Shortest Path Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 247-265, May.
    10. F Ruiz & M Luque & J M Cabello, 2009. "A classification of the weighting schemes in reference point procedures for multiobjective programming," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(4), pages 544-553, April.
    11. Miettinen, Kaisa & Makela, Marko M., 2006. "Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(3), pages 909-922, May.
    12. Miao, Huiying & Yu, Yadong & Kharrazi, Ali & Ma, Tieju, 2023. "Multi-criteria decision analysis for the planning of island microgrid system: A case study of Yongxing island, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    13. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Minghe, 2005. "Some issues in measuring and reporting solution quality of interactive multiple objective programming procedures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 468-483, April.
    2. M Köksalan & E Karasakal, 2006. "An interactive approach for multiobjective decision making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(5), pages 532-540, May.
    3. Aksoy, Yasemin & Butler, Timothy W. & Minor, Elliott D., 1996. "Comparative studies in interactive multiple objective mathematical programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 408-422, March.
    4. Thomas L. Saaty, 2013. "The Modern Science of Multicriteria Decision Making and Its Practical Applications: The AHP/ANP Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1101-1118, October.
    5. Nowak, Maciej, 2007. "Aspiration level approach in stochastic MCDM problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 1626-1640, March.
    6. Behnam Malakooti, 2015. "Double Helix Value Functions, Ordinal/Cardinal Approach, Additive Utility Functions, Multiple Criteria, Decision Paradigm, Process, and Types (Z Theory I)," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(06), pages 1353-1400, November.
    7. Kaliszewski, Ignacy, 2004. "Out of the mist--towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 293-307, October.
    8. Aloysius, John A. & Davis, Fred D. & Wilson, Darryl D. & Ross Taylor, A. & Kottemann, Jeffrey E., 2006. "User acceptance of multi-criteria decision support systems: The impact of preference elicitation techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 273-285, February.
    9. Sun, Minghe & Steuer, Ralph E., 1996. "InterQuad: An interactive quad tree based procedure for solving the discrete alternative multiple criteria problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 462-472, March.
    10. Bilge Bozkurt & John W. Fowler & Esma S. Gel & Bosun Kim & Murat Köksalan & Jyrki Wallenius, 2010. "Quantitative Comparison of Approximate Solution Sets for Multicriteria Optimization Problems with Weighted Tchebycheff Preference Function," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 650-659, June.
    11. Rafael Lazimy, 2013. "Interactive Polyhedral Outer Approximation (IPOA) strategy for general multiobjective optimization problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 73-99, November.
    12. Alves, Maria Joao & Climaco, Joao, 2007. "A review of interactive methods for multiobjective integer and mixed-integer programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(1), pages 99-115, July.
    13. Korhonen, Pekka J. & Wallenius, Jyrki & Genc, Tolga & Xu, Peng, 2021. "On rational behavior in multi-attribute riskless choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 331-342.
    14. Klimberg, Ronald & Cohen, Robert M., 1999. "Experimental evaluation of a graphical display system to visualizing multiple criteria solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 191-208, November.
    15. Luque, Mariano & Ruiz, Francisco & Steuer, Ralph E., 2010. "Modified interactive Chebyshev algorithm (MICA) for convex multiobjective programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 557-564, August.
    16. Caballero, Rafael & Ruiz, Francisco & Uria, M. Victoria Rodriguez & Romero, Carlos, 2006. "Interactive meta-goal programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 135-154, November.
    17. P. Korhonen, 1998. "Multiple Objective Programming Support," Working Papers ir98010, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    18. Jaszkiewicz, Andrzej & Slowinski, Roman, 1999. "The `Light Beam Search' approach - an overview of methodology and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 300-314, March.
    19. Banu Lokman & Murat Köksalan & Pekka J. Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 2016. "An interactive algorithm to find the most preferred solution of multi-objective integer programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 67-95, October.
    20. Marmol, Amparo M. & Puerto, Justo & Fernandez, Francisco R., 2002. "Sequential incorporation of imprecise information in multiple criteria decision processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 123-133, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:149:y:2003:i:1:p:17-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.