IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v120y2000i1p144-161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations

Author

Listed:
  • Herrera, F.
  • Herrera-Viedma, E.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Herrera, F. & Herrera-Viedma, E., 2000. "Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 144-161, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:120:y:2000:i:1:p:144-161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(98)00383-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nurmi, Hannu & Kacprzyk, Janusz, 1991. "On fuzzy tournaments and their solution concepts in group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 223-232, March.
    2. Bordes, Georges, 1983. "On the possibility of reasonable consistent majoritarian choice: Some positive results," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 122-132, October.
    3. Roubens, M., 1989. "Some properties of choice functions based on valued binary relations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 309-321, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Zeshui, 2005. "Deviation measures of linguistic preference relations in group decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 249-254, June.
    2. Yu-Jie Zheng & Yu Yang & Na Zhang & Yao Jiao, 2016. "A Supernetwork-Based Model for Design Processes of Complex Mechanical Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-25, October.
    3. Jie Tang & Fanyong Meng & Yongliang Zhang, 2022. "Common probability-based interactive algorithms for group decision making with normalized probability linguistic preference relations," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 99-136, March.
    4. Meng Fanyong & Tan Chunqiao, 2017. "Distance Measures for Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguistic Sets," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(4), pages 207-224.
    5. Wang, Jue & Xu, Wei & Ma, Jian & Wang, Shouyang, 2013. "A vague set based decision support approach for evaluating research funding programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 656-665.
    6. Wang, Tien-Chin & Chang, Tsung-Han, 2007. "Application of consistent fuzzy preference relations in predicting the success of knowledge management implementation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1313-1329, November.
    7. Dong, Yucheng & Xu, Yinfeng & Li, Hongyi & Dai, Min, 2008. "A comparative study of the numerical scales and the prioritization methods in AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 229-242, April.
    8. Fanyong Meng & Qingxian An & Xiaohong Chen, 2016. "A consistency and consensus-based method to group decision making with interval linguistic preference relations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(11), pages 1419-1437, November.
    9. Li, Yanhong & Kou, Gang & Li, Guangxu & Peng, Yi, 2022. "Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 790-802.
    10. Yang Li & Jia Liu & Liqun Gao & Zhi Kong, 2008. "Peak Load Shifting Distribution by Fuzzy Method Based on Weight Compromise Coefficient," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(2), pages 1-12, March.
    11. Chai, Junyi & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2015. "Multi-perspective strategic supplier selection in uncertain environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 215-225.
    12. Ming Tang & Huchang Liao, 2022. "A graph model for conflict resolution with inconsistent preferences among large-scale participants," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 455-478, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleskerov, Fuad & Karabekyan, Daniel & Sanver, M. Remzi & Yakuba, Vyacheslav, 2012. "On the manipulability of voting rules: The case of 4 and 5 alternatives," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 67-73.
    2. Hellendoorn, Hans, 1997. "After the fuzzy wave reached Europe," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 58-71, May.
    3. Greco, Salvatore, 1997. "A new PCCA method: IDRA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 587-601, May.
    4. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2023. "Stable Voting," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 421-433, September.
    5. Brandt, Felix, 2011. "Minimal stable sets in tournaments," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(4), pages 1481-1499, July.
    6. Fuad Aleskerov & Andrey Subochev, 2013. "Modeling optimal social choice: matrix-vector representation of various solution concepts based on majority rule," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 737-756, June.
    7. John Duggan, 2019. "Weak rationalizability and Arrovian impossibility theorems for responsive social choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 7-40, April.
    8. Wesley H. Holliday & Chase Norman & Eric Pacuit & Saam Zahedian, 2022. "Impossibility theorems involving weakenings of expansion consistency and resoluteness in voting," Papers 2208.06907, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    9. Anindya Bhattacharya & Victoria Brosi & Francesco Ciardiello, 2018. "The uncovered set and the core: Cox's (1987) result revisited," Discussion Papers 18/13, Department of Economics, University of York.
    10. Montero, J. & Tejada, J. & Cutello, C., 1997. "A general model for deriving preference structures from data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 98-110, April.
    11. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2021. "Stable Voting," Papers 2108.00542, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    12. Herrera, F. & Martinez, L. & Sanchez, P. J., 2005. "Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(1), pages 115-132, October.
    13. Ling-Zhong Lin, 2010. "Fuzzy multi-linguistic preferences model of service innovations at wholesale service delivery," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 217-237, February.
    14. Felix Brandt, 2015. "Set-monotonicity implies Kelly-strategyproofness," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(4), pages 793-804, December.
    15. Anindya Bhattacharya & Victoria Brosi & Francesco Ciardiello, 2018. "The Uncovered Set and the Core: Cox's Result Revisited," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Wesley H. Holliday & Eric Pacuit, 2023. "Split Cycle: a new Condorcet-consistent voting method independent of clones and immune to spoilers," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 197(1), pages 1-62, October.
    17. Hanna Borzęcka, 2012. "Multi-criteria decision making using fuzzy preference relations," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 22(3), pages 5-21.
    18. John Duggan, 2011. "Uncovered Sets," Wallis Working Papers WP63, University of Rochester - Wallis Institute of Political Economy.
    19. Nurmi, Hannu & Kacprzyk, Janusz & Fedrizzi, Mario, 1996. "Probabilistic, fuzzy and rough concepts in social choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 264-277, December.
    20. Brandt, Felix & Fischer, Felix, 2008. "Computing the minimal covering set," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 254-268, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:120:y:2000:i:1:p:144-161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.