IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eejocm/v43y2022ics1755534522000136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the subscribing behavior of customized bus passengers: Active users versus inactive users

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Jiangbo
  • Yamamoto, Toshiyuki
  • Liu, Kai

Abstract

Understanding the mechanism of continuous subscribing behavior is vital to the operation and even survival of customized bus (CB) systems. Capturing the differences in subscribing behavior of active and inactive users and developing targeted and differentiated marketing strategies accordingly will help to improve the user retention rate. The results of this study revealed differences in the subscribing behavior between active and inactive users and the influence of a wide range of factors on the subscription behavior between the two groups, such as area-related and individual characteristics. Travel distance presents an inverted “U” shape effect on the propensity to use CB with the vertex at around 16 km for active users and 28 km for inactive users, which is a further finding of the monotonic positive effect indicated by the existing studies. For every RMB 10 cheaper CB trip, the likelihood that an active user holds a higher “propensity” to use CB services will increase by 8%. The cost advantage will attract novelty-seeking travelers to try CB services occasionally, but cannot convert them into high-frequency users. The passengers who started to subscribe to the CB service in winter are more likely to travel by CB frequently no matter in active and inactive user groups. The findings of this empirical study lay a theoretical foundation for ridership retention and marketing orientation of the customized and demand-responsive transit services.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Jiangbo & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Liu, Kai, 2022. "Exploring the subscribing behavior of customized bus passengers: Active users versus inactive users," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:43:y:2022:i:c:s1755534522000136
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755534522000136
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. dell'Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Angel & Cecin, Patricia, 2011. "The quality of service desired by public transport users," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 217-227, January.
    2. Yang, Shuo & Fan, Yingling & Deng, Wei & Cheng, Long, 2019. "Do built environment effects on travel behavior differ between household members? A case study of Nanjing, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 360-370.
    3. Wang, Jiangbo & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Liu, Kai, 2021. "Spatial dependence and spillover effects in customized bus demand: Empirical evidence using spatial dynamic panel models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 166-180.
    4. Ding, Chuan & Wang, Donggen & Liu, Chao & Zhang, Yi & Yang, Jiawen, 2017. "Exploring the influence of built environment on travel mode choice considering the mediating effects of car ownership and travel distance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 65-80.
    5. Xinyu Cao & Susan Handy & Patricia Mokhtarian, 2006. "The Influences of the Built Environment and Residential Self-Selection on Pedestrian Behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Liu, Tao & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2015. "Analysis of a new public-transport-service concept: Customized bus in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 63-76.
    7. Mulley, Corinne & Nelson, John D., 2009. "Flexible transport services: A new market opportunity for public transport," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 39-45.
    8. Richard Williams, 2006. "Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 6(1), pages 58-82, March.
    9. Xinyu Cao & Patricia Mokhtarian & Susan Handy, 2007. "Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 535-556, September.
    10. Luca Quadrifoglio & Randolph W. Hall & Maged M. Dessouky, 2006. "Performance and Design of Mobility Allowance Shuttle Transit Services: Bounds on the Maximum Longitudinal Velocity," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(3), pages 351-363, August.
    11. Redman, Lauren & Friman, Margareta & Gärling, Tommy & Hartig, Terry, 2013. "Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 119-127.
    12. Chao Wang & Mohammed Quddus & Marcus Enoch & Tim Ryley & Lisa Davison, 2014. "Multilevel modelling of Demand Responsive Transport (DRT) trips in Greater Manchester based on area-wide socio-economic data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 589-610, May.
    13. Loo, Leanne Yong Le & Corcoran, Jonathan & Mateo-Babiano, Derlie & Zahnow, Renee, 2015. "Transport mode choice in South East Asia: Investigating the relationship between transport users’ perception and travel behaviour in Johor Bahru, Malaysia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 99-111.
    14. Davison, Lisa & Enoch, Marcus & Ryley, Tim & Quddus, Mohammed & Wang, Chao, 2014. "A survey of Demand Responsive Transport in Great Britain," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 47-54.
    15. Murad H. & Fleischman A. & Sadetzki S. & Geyer O. & Freedman L.S., 2003. "Small Samples and Ordered Logistic Regression: Does it Help to Collapse Categories of Outcome?," The American Statistician, American Statistical Association, vol. 57, pages 155-160, August.
    16. Dea van Lierop & Madhav G. Badami & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2018. "What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 52-72, January.
    17. Bass, Pablo & Donoso, Pedro & Munizaga, Marcela, 2011. "A model to assess public transport demand stability," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 755-764, October.
    18. Tao, Tao & Wang, Jueyu & Cao, Xinyu, 2020. "Exploring the non-linear associations between spatial attributes and walking distance to transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Greene,William H. & Hensher,David A., 2010. "Modeling Ordered Choices," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521142373.
    20. Greene,William H. & Hensher,David A., 2010. "Modeling Ordered Choices," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521194204.
    21. Yunfeng Hu & Yueqi Han, 2019. "Identification of Urban Functional Areas Based on POI Data: A Case Study of the Guangzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magalhães, David José Ahouagi Vaz de & Rivera-Gonzalez, Carlos, 2021. "Car users’ attitudes towards an enhanced bus system to mitigate urban congestion in a developing country," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 452-464.
    2. Muhammad Ashraf Javid & Nazam Ali & Syed Arif Hussain Shah & Muhammad Abdullah, 2021. "Travelers’ Attitudes Toward Mobile Application–Based Public Transport Services in Lahore," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    3. Rubén Cordera & Soledad Nogués & Esther González-González & Luigi dell’Olio, 2019. "Intra-Urban Spatial Disparities in User Satisfaction with Public Transport Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Hanna Dudek & Joanna Landmesser, 2012. "Income satisfaction and relative deprivation," Statistics in Transition new series, Główny Urząd Statystyczny (Polska), vol. 13(2), pages 321-334, June.
    5. Charlie Tchinda & Marcus Dejardin, 2021. "Are Business Policy Measures in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic to Be Equally Valued? An Exploration According to SMEs Owners’ Business Expectations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-42, October.
    6. Patricia H. Born & E. Tice Sirmans, 2019. "Regret in health insurance post‐purchase behavior," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 22(2), pages 207-219, July.
    7. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Rosell, Jordi, 2019. "Effect of a major network reform on bus transit satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 310-333.
    8. Tirachini, Alejandro & del Río, Mariana, 2019. "Ride-hailing in Santiago de Chile: Users’ characterisation and effects on travel behaviour," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 46-57.
    9. Carolina Ortega Londoño & Daniel Gómez Mesa & Lina Cardona-Sosa & Catalina Gómez Toro, 2019. "Happiness and Victimization in Latin America," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 935-954, March.
    10. De Vos, Jonas, 2018. "Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 261-274.
    11. Mnasri, Mohamed & Dionne, Georges & Gueyie, Jean-Pierre, 2013. "How do firms hedge risks? Empirical evidence from U.S. oil and gas producers," Working Papers 13-3, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    12. Roger, Muriel & Arrondel, Luc & Savignac, Frédérique, 2014. "Wealth and income in the euro area: Heterogeneity in households' behaviours?," Working Paper Series 1709, European Central Bank.
    13. Sohani Liyanage & Hussein Dia & Rusul Abduljabbar & Saeed Asadi Bagloee, 2019. "Flexible Mobility On-Demand: An Environmental Scan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-39, February.
    14. Kaiser, Caspar, 2022. "Using memories to assess the intrapersonal comparability of wellbeing reports," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 410-442.
    15. Laetitia Duval & François-Charles Wolff, 2016. "“I even met happy gypsies”," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 24(4), pages 727-764, October.
    16. Philippe Cyrenne & Alan Chan, 2019. "The Determinants of Student Success in University: A Generalized Ordered Logit Approach," Departmental Working Papers 2019-03, The University of Winnipeg, Department of Economics.
    17. De Vos, Jonas & Mouratidis, Kostas & Cheng, Long & Kamruzzaman, Md., 2021. "Does a residential relocation enable satisfying travel?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 188-201.
    18. Loa, Patrick & Hossain, Sanjana & Liu, Yicong & Nurul Habib, Khandker, 2022. "How has the COVID-19 pandemic affected the use of ride-sourcing services? An empirical evidence-based investigation for the Greater Toronto Area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 46-62.
    19. Andrew S. Fullerton & Jun Xu, 2018. "Constrained and Unconstrained Partial Adjacent Category Logit Models for Ordinal Response Variables," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 47(2), pages 169-206, March.
    20. Udo Schneider & Christian Pfarr & Brit Schneider & Volker Ulrich, 2012. "I feel good! Gender differences and reporting heterogeneity in self-assessed health," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(3), pages 251-265, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eejocm:v:43:y:2022:i:c:s1755534522000136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-choice-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.