IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecosta/v27y2023icp16-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multivariate Randomized Response Model for Sensitive Binary Data

Author

Listed:
  • Chu, Amanda M.Y.
  • Omori, Yasuhiro
  • So, Hing-yu
  • So, Mike K.P.

Abstract

A new statistical method is proposed to combine the randomized response technique, probit modeling, and Bayesian analysis to analyze large-scale online surveys of multiple binary randomized responses. The proposed method is illustrated by analyzing sensitive dichotomous randomized responses on different types of drug administration error from nurses in a hospital cluster. A statistical challenge is that nurses’ true sensitive responses are unobservable because of a randomization scheme that protects their data privacy to answer the sensitive questions. Four main contributions of the paper are highlighted. The first is the construction of a generic statistical approach in modeling multivariate sensitive binary data collected from the randomized response technique. The second is studying the dependence of multivariate sensitive responses via statistical measures. The third is the calculation of an overall attitude score using sensitive responses. The last one is an illustration of the proposed statistical method for analyzing administration policies that potentially involve sensitive topics which are important to study but are not easily investigated via empirical studies. The particular healthcare example on drug administration policies demonstrated in this paper also presents a scientific way to elicit managerial strategies while protecting data privacy through analytics.

Suggested Citation

  • Chu, Amanda M.Y. & Omori, Yasuhiro & So, Hing-yu & So, Mike K.P., 2023. "A Multivariate Randomized Response Model for Sensitive Binary Data," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 16-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:27:y:2023:i:c:p:16-35
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecosta.2022.01.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452306222000041
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Contains open access articles
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecosta.2022.01.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vivekananda Roy & James P. Hobert, 2007. "Convergence rates and asymptotic standard errors for Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for Bayesian probit regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 69(4), pages 607-623, September.
    2. Samuel S. K. Kwan & Mike K. P. So & Kar Yan Tam, 2010. "Research Note ---Applying the Randomized Response Technique to Elicit Truthful Responses to Sensitive Questions in IS Research: The Case of Software Piracy Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 941-959, December.
    3. Nicholas G. Polson & James G. Scott & Jesse Windle, 2013. "Bayesian Inference for Logistic Models Using Pólya--Gamma Latent Variables," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(504), pages 1339-1349, December.
    4. McFadden, Daniel, 1980. "Econometric Models for Probabilistic Choice among Products," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 53(3), pages 13-29, July.
    5. Doyle, Peter, 1977. "The application of probit, logit, and tobit in marketing: A review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 235-248, September.
    6. Imai, Kosuke & van Dyk, David A., 2005. "A Bayesian analysis of the multinomial probit model using marginal data augmentation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 311-334, February.
    7. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1981. "Qualitative Response Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1483-1536, December.
    8. Jeongeun Kim & David W Bates, 2013. "Medication administration errors by nurses: adherence to guidelines," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(3-4), pages 590-598, February.
    9. Celine Marielle Laffont & Marc Vandemeulebroecke & Didier Concordet, 2014. "Multivariate Analysis of Longitudinal Ordinal Data With Mixed Effects Models, With Application to Clinical Outcomes in Osteoarthritis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(507), pages 955-966, September.
    10. Daniele Durante, 2019. "Conjugate Bayes for probit regression via unified skew-normal distributions," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 106(4), pages 765-779.
    11. Sean M. O'Brien & David B. Dunson, 2004. "Bayesian Multivariate Logistic Regression," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(3), pages 739-746, September.
    12. William Barcella & Maria De Iorio & James Malone‐Lee, 2018. "Modelling correlated binary variables: an application to lower urinary tract symptoms," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(4), pages 1083-1100, August.
    13. Graeme Blair & Kosuke Imai & Yang-Yang Zhou, 2015. "Design and Analysis of the Randomized Response Technique," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(511), pages 1304-1319, September.
    14. Berrett, Candace & Calder, Catherine A., 2012. "Data augmentation strategies for the Bayesian spatial probit regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(3), pages 478-490.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haoying Wang & Guohui Wu, 2022. "Modeling discrete choices with large fine-scale spatial data: opportunities and challenges," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 325-351, July.
    2. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    3. Jakusch, Sven Thorsten, 2017. "On the applicability of maximum likelihood methods: From experimental to financial data," SAFE Working Paper Series 148, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE, revised 2017.
    4. Uddin, Md Nazir & Gaskins, Jeremy T., 2023. "Shared Bayesian variable shrinkage in multinomial logistic regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    5. Wang, Xin & Roy, Vivekananda, 2018. "Analysis of the Pólya-Gamma block Gibbs sampler for Bayesian logistic linear mixed models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 251-256.
    6. Schliep, Erin M. & Hoeting, Jennifer A., 2015. "Data augmentation and parameter expansion for independent or spatially correlated ordinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Reem Aljarallah & Samer A Kharroubi, 2021. "Use of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods to Model Kuwait Medical Genetic Center Data: An Application to Down Syndrome and Mental Retardation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Zhehan Jiang & Jonathan Templin, 2019. "Gibbs Samplers for Logistic Item Response Models via the Pólya–Gamma Distribution: A Computationally Efficient Data-Augmentation Strategy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(2), pages 358-374, June.
    9. Måns Magnusson & Leif Jonsson & Mattias Villani, 2020. "DOLDA: a regularized supervised topic model for high-dimensional multi-class regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 175-201, March.
    10. Amanda M. Y. Chu & Mike K. P. So & Ray S. W. Chung, 2018. "Applying the Randomized Response Technique in Business Ethics Research: The Misuse of Information Systems Resources in the Workplace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 195-212, August.
    11. Andy C. Y. Chong & Amanda M. Y. Chu & Mike K. P. So & Ray S. W. Chung, 2019. "Asking Sensitive Questions Using the Randomized Response Approach in Public Health Research: An Empirical Study on the Factors of Illegal Waste Disposal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Mahmud, Asif & Gayah, Vikash V. & Paleti, Rajesh, 2022. "A latent choice model to analyze the role of preliminary preferences in shaping observed choices," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 95-108.
    13. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    14. Arturo Estrella & Anthony P. Rodrigues, 1998. "Consistent covariance matrix estimation in probit models with autocorrelated errors," Staff Reports 39, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    15. T.R.L. Fry & R.D. Brooks & Br. Comley & J. Zhang, 1993. "Economic Motivations for Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variable Models," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 69(2), pages 193-205, June.
    16. Niko Hauzenberger & Florian Huber, 2020. "Model instability in predictive exchange rate regressions," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 168-186, March.
    17. Gómez Ramos, Almudena & Bardají Azcaráte, Isabel & Atance Muñiz, Ignacio, 2006. "The role of geographical labelling in inserting extensive cattle systems into beef marketing channels. Evidence from three Spanish case studies," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 78.
    18. Maria Iacovou, 2002. "Class Size in the Early Years: Is Smaller Really Better?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 261-290.
    19. Erik Stam & Roy Thurik & Peter van der Zwan, 2010. "Entrepreneurial exit in real and imagined markets," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(4), pages 1109-1139, August.
    20. Rub'en Loaiza-Maya & Didier Nibbering, 2022. "Fast variational Bayes methods for multinomial probit models," Papers 2202.12495, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecosta:v:27:y:2023:i:c:p:16-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/econometrics-and-statistics .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.