IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v230y2012icp34-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fishery policy exploration in the Pearl River Estuary based on an Ecosim model

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Y.
  • Li, S.Y.
  • Duan, L.J.
  • Liu, Y.

Abstract

The Pearl River Estuary (PRE) is a tropical estuary that was an important fishery ground in the South China Sea, where many other fisheries have also experienced substantial declines in productivity. In this study, we develop an ecological model constructed by Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) software to explore the consequences of different fishing policies on the management of the PRE ecosystem. Scenarios are examined that maximise the net profits from the fishing activities, the jobs provided by the fisheries and the measures of ecosystem status. Then the trade-offs due to the ecosystem-scale optimisation of fishery management policies are analysed. The results indicate that optimising short-term economic and social (employment) goals in the PRE creates a depletion of the top predators and losses of biodiversity. Alternatively, focusing on the structure of the ecosystem leads to a reduction in fishing effort for almost all fleets and a corresponding increase in the biomass of most fishes at the expense of reduced profits and jobs provided by the fisheries. An ideal policy compromise is found when equal weight placed on profits, jobs and ecosystem structure, which leads to an overall increase in profits, jobs/catch value, ecosystem maturity and biodiversity. The effects of changing weights placed on profits, jobs/catch value and ecosystem maturity on ecosystem indices are examined and the parameters of vulnerabilities and discount rates are also analysed in this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Y. & Li, S.Y. & Duan, L.J. & Liu, Y., 2012. "Fishery policy exploration in the Pearl River Estuary based on an Ecosim model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 34-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:230:y:2012:i:c:p:34-43
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380012000373
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sumaila, Ussif R. & Walters, Carl, 2005. "Intergenerational discounting: a new intuitive approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 135-142, January.
    2. Cheung, William W.L. & Sumaila, U. Rashid, 2008. "Trade-offs between conservation and socio-economic objectives in managing a tropical marine ecosystem," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 193-210, May.
    3. Martin L. Weitzman, 2001. "Gamma Discounting," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(1), pages 260-271, March.
    4. Arreguin-Sanchez, Francisco & Zetina-Rejón, Manuel & Ramírez-Rodríguez, Mauricio, 2008. "Exploring ecosystem-based harvesting strategies to recover the collapsed pink shrimp (Farfantepenaeus duorarum) fishery in the southern Gulf of Mexico," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 83-94.
    5. Araújo, Júlio N. & Mackinson, Steve & Stanford, Richard J. & Hart, Paul J.B., 2008. "Exploring fisheries strategies for the western English Channel using an ecosystem model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 210(4), pages 465-477.
    6. Duan, L.J. & Li, S.Y. & Liu, Y. & Moreau, J. & Christensen, V., 2009. "Modeling changes in the coastal ecosystem of the Pearl River Estuary from 1981 to 1998," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(20), pages 2802-2818.
    7. Yu, Huiguo & Yu, Yunjun, 2008. "Fishing capacity management in China: Theoretic and practical perspectives," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 351-359, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Ying & Hu, Jianfeng & Pan, Haoran & Li, Shiyu & Failler, Pierre, 2016. "An integrated model for marine fishery management in the Pearl River Estuary: Linking socio-economic systems and ecosystems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 135-147.
    2. Wang, Ying & Duan, Lijie & Li, Shiyu & Zeng, Zeyu & Failler, Pierre, 2015. "Modeling the effect of the seasonal fishing moratorium on the Pearl River Estuary using ecosystem simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 406-416.
    3. Deehr, Rebecca A. & Luczkovich, Joseph J. & Hart, Kevin J. & Clough, Lisa M. & Johnson, Beverly J. & Johnson, Jeffrey C., 2014. "Using stable isotope analysis to validate effective trophic levels from Ecopath models of areas closed and open to shrimp trawling in Core Sound, NC, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 282(C), pages 1-17.
    4. G. B. Sreekanth & S. K. Chakraborty & A. K. Jaiswar & P. U. Zacharia & K. S. Mohamed, 2021. "Modeling the impacts of fishing regulations in a tropical Indian estuary using Ecopath with Ecosim approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 17745-17763, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christensen, Villy & Ferdaña, Zach & Steenbeek, Jeroen, 2009. "Spatial optimization of protected area placement incorporating ecological, social and economical criteria," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(19), pages 2583-2593.
    2. Wang, Ying & Hu, Jianfeng & Pan, Haoran & Li, Shiyu & Failler, Pierre, 2016. "An integrated model for marine fishery management in the Pearl River Estuary: Linking socio-economic systems and ecosystems," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 135-147.
    3. Maroto, Jose M. & Moran, Manuel, 2008. "Increasing marginal returns and the danger of collapse of commercially valuable fish stocks," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 422-428, December.
    4. Iho Antti & Kitti Mitri, 2011. "A Tail-Payoff Puzzle in Dynamic Pollution Control," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-30, May.
    5. Joan Pasqual & Emilio Padilla, 2007. "The Appraisal of Projects with Environmental Impacts. Efficiency and Sustainability," Working Papers wpdea0704, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    6. Andrés M. Cisneros‐Montemayor & F. Gordon Kirkwood & Sarah Harper & Dirk Zeller & U. Rashid Sumaila, 2013. "Economic use value of the Belize marine ecosystem: Potential risks and benefits from offshore oil exploration," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 37(4), pages 221-230, November.
    7. Wang, Ying & Duan, Lijie & Li, Shiyu & Zeng, Zeyu & Failler, Pierre, 2015. "Modeling the effect of the seasonal fishing moratorium on the Pearl River Estuary using ecosystem simulation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 312(C), pages 406-416.
    8. Saez, Carmen Almansa & Requena, Javier Calatrava, 2007. "Reconciling sustainability and discounting in Cost-Benefit Analysis: A methodological proposal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 712-725, February.
    9. Johan Eyckmans & Michael Finus, 2006. "New roads to international environmental agreements: the case of global warming," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 7(4), pages 391-414, December.
    10. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    11. Simon Levin & Anastasios Xepapadeas, 2021. "On the Coevolution of Economic and Ecological Systems," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 13(1), pages 355-377, October.
    12. Steve Newbold & Charles Griffiths & Christopher C. Moore & Ann Wolverton & Elizabeth Kopits, 2010. "The "Social Cost of Carbon" Made Simple," NCEE Working Paper Series 201007, National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, revised Aug 2010.
    13. Pindyck, Robert S., 2019. "The social cost of carbon revisited," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 140-160.
    14. Maria Arvaniti & Chandra K. Krishnamurthy & Anne-Sophie Crépin, 2019. "Time-consistent resource management with regime shifts," CER-ETH Economics working paper series 19/329, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich.
    15. Brias, Antoine & Munch, Stephan B., 2021. "Ecosystem based multi-species management using Empirical Dynamic Programming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    16. Defrancesco, Edi & Gatto, Paola & Rosato, Paolo, 2014. "A ‘component-based’ approach to discounting for natural resource damage assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-9.
    17. Teh, Louise S.L. & Teh, Lydia C.L. & Rashid Sumaila, U., 2014. "Time preference of small-scale fishers in open access and traditionally managed reef fisheries," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 222-231.
    18. Speers, Ann E. & Besedin, Elena Y. & Palardy, James E. & Moore, Chris, 2016. "Impacts of climate change and ocean acidification on coral reef fisheries: An integrated ecological–economic model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 33-43.
    19. Hansen, Anders Chr., 2006. "Do declining discount rates lead to time inconsistent economic advice?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 138-144, November.
    20. Gollier, Christian, 2016. "Gamma discounters are short-termist," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 83-90.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:230:y:2012:i:c:p:34-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.