IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2009i12p4073-4082.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Semiparametric Bayesian approaches to joinpoint regression for population-based cancer survival data

Author

Listed:
  • Ghosh, Pulak
  • Huang, Lan
  • Yu, Binbing
  • Tiwari, Ram C.

Abstract

According to the American Cancer Society report (1999), cancer surpasses heart disease as the leading cause of death in the United States of America (USA) for people of age less than 85. Thus, medical research in cancer is an important public health interest. Understanding how medical improvements are affecting cancer incidence, mortality and survival is critical for effective cancer control. In this paper, we study the cancer survival trend on the population level cancer data. In particular, we develop a parametric Bayesian joinpoint regression model based on a Poisson distribution for the relative survival. To avoid identifying the cause of death, we only conduct analysis based on the relative survival. The method is further extended to the semiparametric Bayesian joinpoint regression models wherein the parametric distributional assumptions of the joinpoint regression models are relaxed by modeling the distribution of regression slopes using Dirichlet process mixtures. We also consider the effect of adding covariates of interest in the joinpoint model. Three model selection criteria, namely, the conditional predictive ordinate (CPO), the expected predictive deviance (EPD), and the deviance information criteria (DIC), are used to select the number of joinpoints. We analyze the grouped survival data for distant testicular cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program using these Bayesian models.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghosh, Pulak & Huang, Lan & Yu, Binbing & Tiwari, Ram C., 2009. "Semiparametric Bayesian approaches to joinpoint regression for population-based cancer survival data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4073-4082, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:12:p:4073-4082
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(09)00143-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. G. T. Denison & B. K. Mallick & A. F. M. Smith, 1998. "Automatic Bayesian curve fitting," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 60(2), pages 333-350.
    2. David J. Spiegelhalter & Nicola G. Best & Bradley P. Carlin & Angelika Van Der Linde, 2002. "Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(4), pages 583-639, October.
    3. Ram C. Tiwari & Kathleen A. Cronin & William Davis & Eric J. Feuer & Binbing Yu & Siddhartha Chib, 2005. "Bayesian model selection for join point regression with application to age‐adjusted cancer rates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 54(5), pages 919-939, November.
    4. Ghosh, Pulak & Basu, Sanjib & Tiwari, Ram C., 2009. "Bayesian Analysis of Cancer Rates From SEER Program Using Parametric and Semiparametric Joinpoint Regression Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 104(486), pages 439-452.
    5. P. M. Lerman, 1980. "Fitting Segmented Regression Models by Grid Search," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 29(1), pages 77-84, March.
    6. Bradley P. Carlin & Alan E. Gelfand & Adrian F. M. Smith, 1992. "Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis of Changepoint Problems," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 41(2), pages 389-405, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Binbing & Barrett, Michael J. & Kim, Hyune-Ju & Feuer, Eric J., 2007. "Estimating joinpoints in continuous time scale for multiple change-point models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 2420-2427, February.
    2. Eric F. Lock & Nidhi Kohli & Maitreyee Bose, 2018. "Detecting Multiple Random Changepoints in Bayesian Piecewise Growth Mixture Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(3), pages 733-750, September.
    3. Erjia Ge & Yee Leung, 2013. "Detection of crossover time scales in multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 115-147, April.
    4. Chen, Cathy W.S. & Chan, Jennifer S.K. & So, Mike K.P. & Lee, Kevin K.M., 2011. "Classification in segmented regression problems," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 2276-2287, July.
    5. Johnson, Matthew S., 2007. "Modeling dichotomous item responses with free-knot splines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4178-4192, May.
    6. Scheipl, Fabian & Kneib, Thomas, 2009. "Locally adaptive Bayesian P-splines with a Normal-Exponential-Gamma prior," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(10), pages 3533-3552, August.
    7. Chiara Lattanzi & Manuele Leonelli, 2019. "A changepoint approach for the identification of financial extreme regimes," Papers 1902.09205, arXiv.org.
    8. Ausín, M. Concepción & Galeano, Pedro & Ghosh, Pulak, 2014. "A semiparametric Bayesian approach to the analysis of financial time series with applications to value at risk estimation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 350-358.
    9. Erengul Dodd & Jonathan J. Forster & Jakub Bijak & Peter W. F. Smith, 2018. "Smoothing mortality data: the English Life Tables, 2010–2012," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(3), pages 717-735, June.
    10. Matúš Maciak & Ivan Mizera, 2016. "Regularization techniques in joinpoint regression," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 939-955, December.
    11. Chan, J.S.K. & Lam, C.P.Y. & Yu, P.L.H. & Choy, S.T.B. & Chen, C.W.S., 2012. "A Bayesian conditional autoregressive geometric process model for range data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3006-3019.
    12. Voleti, Sudhir & Srinivasan, V. & Ghosh, Pulak, 2017. "An approach to improve the predictive power of choice-based conjoint analysis," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 325-335.
    13. Kenji Hatakenaka & Kosuke Oya, 2021. "Bayesian inference for time varying partial adjustment model with application to intraday price discovery," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 21-19, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    14. Binbing Yu & Lan Huang & Ram C. Tiwari & Eric J. Feuer & Karen A. Johnson, 2009. "Modelling population‐based cancer survival trends by using join point models for grouped survival data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(2), pages 405-425, April.
    15. Brezger, Andreas & Lang, Stefan, 2006. "Generalized structured additive regression based on Bayesian P-splines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 967-991, February.
    16. DAVID E. ALLEN & MICHAEL McALEER & ROBERT J. POWELL & ABHAY K. SINGH, 2018. "Non-Parametric Multiple Change Point Analysis Of The Global Financial Crisis," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(02), pages 1-23, June.
    17. Buddhavarapu, Prasad & Bansal, Prateek & Prozzi, Jorge A., 2021. "A new spatial count data model with time-varying parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 566-586.
    18. Mumtaz, Haroon & Theodoridis, Konstantinos, 2017. "Common and country specific economic uncertainty," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 205-216.
    19. Jesse Elliott & Zemin Bai & Shu-Ching Hsieh & Shannon E Kelly & Li Chen & Becky Skidmore & Said Yousef & Carine Zheng & David J Stewart & George A Wells, 2020. "ALK inhibitors for non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, February.
    20. Christina Leuker & Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig & Timothy J. Pleskac, 2019. "Do people exploit risk–reward structures to simplify information processing in risky choice?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 5(1), pages 76-94, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:12:p:4073-4082. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.