IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v104y2016icp10-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power computation for hypothesis testing with high-dimensional covariance matrices

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Ruitao
  • Liu, Zhongying
  • Zheng, Shurong
  • Yin, Guosheng

Abstract

Based on the random matrix theory, a unified numerical approach is developed for power calculation in the general framework of hypothesis testing with high-dimensional covariance matrices. In the central limit theorem of linear spectral statistics for sample covariance matrices, the theoretical mean and covariance are computed numerically. Based on these numerical values, the power of the hypothesis test can be evaluated, and furthermore the confidence interval for the unknown parameters in the high-dimensional covariance matrix can be constructed. The validity of the proposed algorithms is well supported by a convergence theorem. Our numerical method is assessed by extensive simulation studies, and a real data example of the S&P 100 index data is analyzed to illustrate the proposed algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Ruitao & Liu, Zhongying & Zheng, Shurong & Yin, Guosheng, 2016. "Power computation for hypothesis testing with high-dimensional covariance matrices," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 10-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:104:y:2016:i:c:p:10-23
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.05.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947316301104
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2016.05.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2004. "A well-conditioned estimator for large-dimensional covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 365-411, February.
    2. repec:taf:jnlbes:v:30:y:2012:i:2:p:212-228 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Wang, Cheng, 2014. "Asymptotic power of likelihood ratio tests for high dimensional data," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 184-189.
    4. Ledoit, Olivier & Wolf, Michael, 2003. "Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(5), pages 603-621, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hannart, Alexis & Naveau, Philippe, 2014. "Estimating high dimensional covariance matrices: A new look at the Gaussian conjugate framework," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 149-162.
    2. Candelon, B. & Hurlin, C. & Tokpavi, S., 2012. "Sampling error and double shrinkage estimation of minimum variance portfolios," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 511-527.
    3. Mishra, Anil V., 2016. "Foreign bias in Australian-domiciled mutual fund holdings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-123.
    4. McDowell, Shaun, 2018. "An empirical evaluation of estimation error reduction strategies applied to international diversification," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 1-13.
    5. Olivier Ledoit & Michael Wolf, 2003. "Honey, I shrunk the sample covariance matrix," Economics Working Papers 691, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    6. Hafner, Christian M. & Linton, Oliver B. & Tang, Haihan, 2020. "Estimation of a multiplicative correlation structure in the large dimensional case," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 431-470.
    7. Füss, Roland & Miebs, Felix & Trübenbach, Fabian, 2014. "A jackknife-type estimator for portfolio revision," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-28.
    8. Tatsuya Kubokawa & Muni S. Srivastava, 2013. "Optimal Ridge-type Estimators of Covariance Matrix in High Dimension," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-906, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    9. Tae-Hwy Lee & Ekaterina Seregina, 2020. "Learning from Forecast Errors: A New Approach to Forecast Combination," Working Papers 202024, University of California at Riverside, Department of Economics.
    10. Mahsa Ghorbani & Edwin K. P. Chong, 2018. "Stock Price Prediction using Principle Components," Papers 1803.05075, arXiv.org.
    11. Paolella, Marc S. & Polak, Paweł & Walker, Patrick S., 2021. "A non-elliptical orthogonal GARCH model for portfolio selection under transaction costs," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    12. Yan Zhang & Jiyuan Tao & Zhixiang Yin & Guoqiang Wang, 2022. "Improved Large Covariance Matrix Estimation Based on Efficient Convex Combination and Its Application in Portfolio Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Andersen, Torben G. & Bollerslev, Tim & Christoffersen, Peter F. & Diebold, Francis X., 2013. "Financial Risk Measurement for Financial Risk Management," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1127-1220, Elsevier.
    14. Istvan Varga-Haszonits & Fabio Caccioli & Imre Kondor, 2016. "Replica approach to mean-variance portfolio optimization," Papers 1606.08679, arXiv.org.
    15. Mishra, Anil V., 2015. "Measures of equity home bias puzzle," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 293-312.
    16. Emmanuel Jurczenko & Bertrand Maillet & Paul Merlin, 2008. "Efficient Frontier for Robust Higher-order Moment Portfolio Selection," Post-Print halshs-00336475, HAL.
    17. Thomas Trier Bjerring & Omri Ross & Alex Weissensteiner, 2017. "Feature selection for portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 256(1), pages 21-40, September.
    18. Bollerslev, Tim & Patton, Andrew J. & Quaedvlieg, Rogier, 2018. "Modeling and forecasting (un)reliable realized covariances for more reliable financial decisions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 71-91.
    19. Roccazzella, Francesco & Gambetti, Paolo & Vrins, Frédéric, 2022. "Optimal and robust combination of forecasts via constrained optimization and shrinkage," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 97-116.
    20. Fabio Caccioli & Imre Kondor & Matteo Marsili & Susanne Still, 2014. "$L_p$ regularized portfolio optimization," Papers 1404.4040, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:104:y:2016:i:c:p:10-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.