This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Corporate ownership and the value of a vote in an emerging market

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Chung, Kee H.
Kim, Jeong-Kuk
Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VFK-3VTSD54-2/2/bb88de2bc684ab881f3bd9c6b7e976a6
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Journal of Corporate Finance.

Volume (Year): 5 (1999)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
Pages: 35-54
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:corfin:v:5:y:1999:i:1:p:35-54

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcorpfin

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Michael S. Gibson, 1999. "Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging markets?," Finance and Economics Discussion Series 1999-63, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.). [Downloadable!]
  2. Goergen, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2000. "Investment policy, internal financing and ownership concentration in the UK," Discussion Paper 116, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Koke, J. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2003. "Do corporate control and product market competition lead to stronger productivity growth? : Evidence from market-oriented and blockholder-based governance regimes," Discussion Paper 78, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Pawlina, Grzegorz & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2005. "Is investment-cash flow sensitivity caused by the agency costs or asymmetric information? Evidence from the UK," Discussion Paper 23, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Crespi-Cladera, R. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2000. "United we stand : corporate monitoring by shareholder coalitions in the UK," Discussion Paper 18, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  6. Alexander Muravyev, 2007. "Dual Class Stock in Russia: What Explains the Price Differential between Common and Preferred Shares?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 680, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  7. Jangkoo Kang & Joon-Seok Kim, 2006. "Private benefits of control and firm leverage: An analysis of Korean firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 439-463, December. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. MArc Levy, 2007. "Control in Pyramidal Structures," Working Papers DULBEA 07-08.RS, Université libre de Bruxelles, Department of Applied Economics (DULBEA). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. Muravyev Alexander, 2004. "The Puzzle of Dual Class Stock in Russia. Explaining the Price Differential between Common and Preferred Shares," EERC Working Paper Series 04-07e, EERC Research Network, Russia and CIS. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Citation analysis on IDEAS includes online papers that are freely accessible and whose text could be automatically analyzed, currently about 210000 papers.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-30.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.