IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v270y2020ics0306261920306310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental benefits of urea production from basic oxygen furnace gas

Author

Listed:
  • de Kleijne, Kiane
  • James, Jebin
  • Hanssen, Steef V.
  • van Zelm, Rosalie

Abstract

Basic oxygen furnace gas (BOFG) is a multi-component residual flow from integrated steel mills composed of CO, CO2, O2, N2 and H2. In this study, we use the life cycle assessment method to quantify the environmental impacts of six applications of BOFG: heat for internal use in the steel mill, heat combined with CO2 storage, electricity production, urea production, urea production combined with CO2 storage and flaring. Urea can be produced from solely BOFG components, making use of the sorption enhanced water–gas shift technology. This application of BOFG is described here for the first time. The environmental impacts of these six applications were compared in light of the impacts of their conventional production (‘counterfactual’). Using BOFG for the production of electricity and urea would result in net greenhouse gas emissions of 0.87 tCO2-eq/tBOFG and 0.69 tCO2-eq/tBOFG, respectively. When excess CO2 is transported and stored, net emission savings could be achieved when producing urea (−0.11 tCO2-eq/tBOFG) and heat (−0.12 tCO2-eq/tBOFG) from BOFG, again as compared to their counterfactual of conventional production. Overall environmental impacts were slightly lower for electricity (5.2E−4 DALY/tBOFG, 1.9E−6 species.yr/tBOFG) compared to urea (6.2E−4 DALY/tBOFG, 1.9E−6 species.yr/tBOFG). Sensitivity analysis showed, however, that when replacing cleaner electricity (e.g. under future power decarbonisation), these relative environmental benefits of electricity production from BOFG are diminished. We conclude that urea production, rather than the current practice of electricity production, is the best investigated option to reduce environmental impacts of BOFG, which can lead to net environmental benefits when combined with CO2 storage.

Suggested Citation

  • de Kleijne, Kiane & James, Jebin & Hanssen, Steef V. & van Zelm, Rosalie, 2020. "Environmental benefits of urea production from basic oxygen furnace gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:270:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920306310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261920306310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chauvy, Remi & Meunier, Nicolas & Thomas, Diane & De Weireld, Guy, 2019. "Selecting emerging CO2 utilization products for short- to mid-term deployment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 662-680.
    2. Kleijn, René & van der Voet, Ester & Kramer, Gert Jan & van Oers, Lauran & van der Giesen, Coen, 2011. "Metal requirements of low-carbon power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 5640-5648.
    3. Ben-Mansour, R. & Habib, M.A. & Bamidele, O.E. & Basha, M. & Qasem, N.A.A. & Peedikakkal, A. & Laoui, T. & Ali, M., 2016. "Carbon capture by physical adsorption: Materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 225-255.
    4. Mohamed Amine Boutabba & Sandrine Lardic, 2017. "EU Emissions Trading Scheme, competitiveness and carbon leakage: new evidence from cement and steel industries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 255(1), pages 47-61, August.
    5. Letitia Petrescu & Dora-Andreea Chisalita & Calin-Cristian Cormos & Giampaolo Manzolini & Paul Cobden & H. A. J. van Dijk, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of SEWGS Technology Applied to Integrated Steel Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, March.
    6. Mohamed Amine Boutabba & Sandrine Lardic, 2017. "EU Emissions Trading Scheme, competitiveness and carbon leakage: new evidence from cement and steel industries," Post-Print hal-02877954, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaojian Su & Chao Deng, 2019. "The heterogeneous effects of exchange rate and stock market on CO2 emission allowance price in China: A panel quantile regression approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Chenhao Fang & Tieju Ma, 2021. "Technology adoption with carbon emission trading mechanism: modeling with heterogeneous agents and uncertain carbon price," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 577-600, May.
    3. Lin, Weiming & Chen, Jianling & Zheng, Yi & Dai, Yongwu, 2019. "Effects of the EU Emission Trading Scheme on the international competitiveness of pulp-and-paper industry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Sean Healy & Katja Schumacher & Wolfgang Eichhammer, 2018. "Analysis of Carbon Leakage under Phase III of the EU Emissions Trading System: Trading Patterns in the Cement and Aluminium Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Di Li & Qianbin Di & Hailin Mu & Zenglin Han & Hongye Wang & Ye Duan, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Output Adjustment Strategy and Carbon Trading Policy on the Response, Stability and Complexity of Steel Market under the Dynamic Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-40, September.
    6. Jianhui Cong & Huimin Wang & Xiaoxiao Hu & Yongbin Zhao & Yingying Wang & Weiqiang Zhang & Ling Zhang, 2023. "Does China’s Pilot Carbon Market Cause Carbon Leakage? New Evidence from the Chemical, Building Material, and Metal Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-27, January.
    7. Jiasen Sun & Guo Li, 2020. "Designing a double auction mechanism for the re-allocation of emission permits," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 847-874, August.
    8. Zaman, Qamar uz & Zhao, Yuhuan & Zaman, Shah & Shah, Aadil Hameed, 2023. "Examining the symmetrical effect of traditional energy resources, industrial production, and poverty lessening on ecological sustainability: Policy track in the milieu of five neighboring Asian econom," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Yan, Shuren & Zhu, Ding & Zhang, Zhiyong & Li, Hai & Chen, Guangjin & Liu, Bei, 2019. "A pilot-scale experimental study on CO2 capture using Zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 slurry under normal pressure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 104-114.
    10. Tajbakhsh, Alireza & Hassini, Elkafi, 2022. "A game-theoretic approach for pollution control initiatives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    11. Ren, Kaipeng & Tang, Xu & Wang, Peng & Willerström, Jakob & Höök, Mikael, 2021. "Bridging energy and metal sustainability: Insights from China’s wind power development up to 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. Zhang, Fengyuan & Wang, Xiaolin & Lou, Xia & Lipiński, Wojciech, 2021. "The effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate and dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride on the kinetics of CO2 hydrate formation in the presence of tetra-n-butyl ammonium bromide for carbon capture applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    13. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & González-Garay, Andrés & Bernardi, Andrea & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Pozo, Carlos & Dowell, Niall Mac & Chachuat, Benoit & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "Electricity grid decarbonisation or green methanol fuel? A life-cycle modelling and analysis of today′s transportation-power nexus," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    14. Jens Teubler & Sebastian Kiefer & Christa Liedtke, 2018. "Metals for Fuels? The Raw Material Shift by Energy-Efficient Transport Systems in Europe," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    15. Kim, Dongin & Han, Jeehoon, 2020. "Comprehensive analysis of two catalytic processes to produce formic acid from carbon dioxide," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    16. Hache, Emmanuel & Simoën, Marine & Seck, Gondia Sokhna & Bonnet, Clément & Jabberi, Aymen & Carcanague, Samuel, 2020. "The impact of future power generation on cement demand: An international and regional assessment based on climate scenarios," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 114-133.
    17. Chu, Genyun & Fan, Yingjie & Zhang, Dawei & Gao, Minglin & Yu, Jianhua & Xie, Jianhui & Yang, Qingchun, 2022. "A highly efficient and environmentally friendly approach for in-situ utilization of CO2 from coal to ethylene glycol plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    18. Chu, Fengming & Yang, Lijun & Du, Xiaoze & Yang, Yongping, 2017. "Mass transfer and energy consumption for CO2 absorption by ammonia solution in bubble column," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1068-1080.
    19. Wei, Wei & Liu, Feng & Wang, Jianhui & Chen, Laijun & Mei, Shengwei & Yuan, Tiejiang, 2016. "Robust environmental-economic dispatch incorporating wind power generation and carbon capture plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 674-684.
    20. Liang, Yanan & Kleijn, René & Tukker, Arnold & van der Voet, Ester, 2022. "Material requirements for low-carbon energy technologies: A quantitative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:270:y:2020:i:c:s0306261920306310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.