IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v259y2020ics0306261919318033.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flashback, burning velocities and hydrogen admixture: Domestic appliance approval, gas regulation and appliance development

Author

Listed:
  • de Vries, Harmen
  • Levinsky, Howard B.

Abstract

Introducing natural gas/hydrogen mixtures to an installed population of domestic natural gas appliances necessarily implies considering the risk of flashback. Previously, we quantified this risk via an interchangeability analysis using calculated laminar burning velocities. With an increasing contribution of renewable energy, still higher hydrogen fractions will become of interest to improve the economic viability in power-to-gas chains. To extend the possibilities for hydrogen admixture beyond the limits given by extant ranges of Wobbe Index and burning velocity, appliance approval standards and gas regulations must be examined to assess the degree to which higher hydrogen fractions are, or can be, justified. However, the current standards and regulations do not consider the risk of flashback in terms of the laminar burning velocity explicitly, leaving the justification of higher hydrogen fractions to empirical observations followed when the approval standards were codified. Here, we reframe the approval and regulation standards in terms of the calculated laminar burning velocity, which quantifies the notion of a ‘safety margin’ to safeguard appliance performance with respect to flashback, for a group of natural gases that is commonplace in the European Union (EU) but representative for many international situations. The method presented can be applied for any local regulatory area. In plots of burning velocity vs. equivalence ratio, ranges of regulated gas qualities are represented as a curve for natural gases, while for natural gas/hydrogen mixtures they appear as areas indicating the variations in hydrogen fraction for different gas compositions that do not increase the risk of flashback. To quantify the safety margin, the approval gas used in the EU for flashback (G222) is taken as an example, because of the many decades of experience in using this gas to safeguard appliance performance. Using the assumed range of gas quality and approval gas as an example, for appliances whose primary equivalence ratio is fuel rich (at greatest risk for flashback), a safety margin of 11.5 cm/s is determined and used in analyses for determining the composition of flashback limit gases in approval standards for a situation in which higher hydrogen fractions are desired. Situations considering both variable and constant fractions of hydrogen in natural gas are examined. The end-use demand for a minimum degree of thermal comfort, by having a minimum Wobbe Index in the regulated range of gas quality, automatically complicates grid management schemes for hydrogen addition: the maximum hydrogen admixture is necessarily coupled to the composition of the natural gas to which it is added. The only solution for having a constant hydrogen fraction without regard to the gas composition is by relaxing this demand on thermal comfort; in the example used here, 20% hydrogen admixture reduces the thermal comfort in the worst case by 4.7%. Fuel suppliers, grid operators and end users must agree to this loss of fitness for purpose to maximize the decarbonization of the gas supply by hydrogen admixture.

Suggested Citation

  • de Vries, Harmen & Levinsky, Howard B., 2020. "Flashback, burning velocities and hydrogen admixture: Domestic appliance approval, gas regulation and appliance development," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:259:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919318033
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261919318033
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lo Basso, Gianluigi & Nastasi, Benedetto & Astiaso Garcia, Davide & Cumo, Fabrizio, 2017. "How to handle the Hydrogen enriched Natural Gas blends in combustion efficiency measurement procedure of conventional and condensing boilers," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 615-636.
    2. Abeysekera, M. & Wu, J. & Jenkins, N. & Rees, M., 2016. "Steady state analysis of gas networks with distributed injection of alternative gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 991-1002.
    3. Olfa Tlili & Christine Mansilla & David Frimat & Yannick Perez, 2019. "Hydrogen market penetration feasibility assessment: Mobility and natural gas markets in the US, Europe, China and Japan," Post-Print hal-02265824, HAL.
    4. Guandalini, Giulio & Colbertaldo, Paolo & Campanari, Stefano, 2017. "Dynamic modeling of natural gas quality within transport pipelines in presence of hydrogen injections," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1712-1723.
    5. Speirs, Jamie & Balcombe, Paul & Johnson, Erin & Martin, Jeanne & Brandon, Nigel & Hawkes, Adam, 2018. "A greener gas grid: What are the options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 291-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Wojtowicz & Jacek Jaworski, 2021. "Operation Analysis of Selected Domestic Appliances Supplied with Mixture of Nitrogen-Rich Natural Gas with Hydrogen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Sun, Mengxiao & Huang, Xiaomei & Hu, Yelong & Lyu, Shan, 2022. "Effects on the performance of domestic gas appliances operated on natural gas mixed with hydrogen," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    3. Cristian Nicolae Eparu & Doru Bogdan Stoica & Adrian Neacsa & Renata Radulescu & Dragos Chiritescu & Alina Petronela Prundurel & Bogdan Ionete, 2024. "Dynamic of H 2 NG in Distribution Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    4. Park, Yeseul & Choi, Minsung & Choi, Gyungmin, 2023. "Thermodynamic performance study of large-scale industrial gas turbine with methane/ammonia/hydrogen blended fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Lopez-Ruiz, G. & Alava, I. & Urresti, I. & Blanco, J.M. & Naud, B., 2021. "Experimental and numerical study of NOx formation in a domestic H2/air coaxial burner at low Reynolds number," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Park, Yeseul & Choi, Minsung & Kim, Dongmin & Lee, Joongsung & Choi, Gyungmin, 2021. "Performance analysis of large-scale industrial gas turbine considering stable combustor operation using novel blended fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    7. Mulako D. Mukelabai & K. G. U. Wijayantha & Richard E. Blanchard, 2022. "Hydrogen for Cooking: A Review of Cooking Technologies, Renewable Hydrogen Systems and Techno-Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-30, December.
    8. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Socio-technical barriers to domestic hydrogen futures: Repurposing pipelines, policies, and public perceptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    9. Mingmin Kong & Shuaiming Feng & Qi Xia & Chen Chen & Zhouxin Pan & Zengliang Gao, 2021. "Investigation of Mixing Behavior of Hydrogen Blended to Natural Gas in Gas Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Danieli, Piero & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Al-Zaili, Jafar & Sayma, Abdulnaser & Masi, Massimo & Carraro, Gianluca, 2022. "The potential of the natural gas grid to accommodate hydrogen as an energy vector in transition towards a fully renewable energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keogh, Niamh & Corr, D. & Monaghan, R.F.D, 2022. "Biogenic renewable gas injection into natural gas grids: A review of technical and economic modelling studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Kolb, Sebastian & Plankenbühler, Thomas & Frank, Jonas & Dettelbacher, Johannes & Ludwig, Ralf & Karl, Jürgen & Dillig, Marius, 2021. "Scenarios for the integration of renewable gases into the German natural gas market – A simulation-based optimisation approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Romeo, Luis M. & Cavana, Marco & Bailera, Manuel & Leone, Pierluigi & Peña, Begoña & Lisbona, Pilar, 2022. "Non-stoichiometric methanation as strategy to overcome the limitations of green hydrogen injection into the natural gas grid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    4. Kouchachvili, Lia & Entchev, Evgueniy, 2018. "Power to gas and H2/NG blend in SMART energy networks concept," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 456-464.
    5. Bermúdez, Alfredo & Shabani, Mohsen, 2022. "Numerical simulation of gas composition tracking in a gas transportation network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    6. Cavana, Marco & Mazza, Andrea & Chicco, Gianfranco & Leone, Pierluigi, 2021. "Electrical and gas networks coupling through hydrogen blending under increasing distributed photovoltaic generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    7. Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Ebrahimi-Moghadam, Amir & Pishbin, Seyyed Iman & Pourramezan, Mahdi, 2019. "Investigating the effect of hydrogen injection on natural gas thermo-physical properties with various compositions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 235-245.
    8. Gu, Chenghong & Tang, Can & Xiang, Yue & Xie, Da, 2019. "Power-to-gas management using robust optimisation in integrated energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 681-689.
    9. Cinti, G. & Bidini, G. & Hemmes, K., 2019. "Comparison of the solid oxide fuel cell system for micro CHP using natural gas with a system using a mixture of natural gas and hydrogen," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 69-77.
    10. Dancker, Jonte & Wolter, Martin, 2022. "A coupled transient gas flow calculation with a simultaneous calorific-value-gradient improved hydrogen tracking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    11. Chaczykowski, Maciej & Zarodkiewicz, Paweł, 2017. "Simulation of natural gas quality distribution for pipeline systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 681-698.
    12. Szoplik, Jolanta & Stelmasińska, Paulina, 2019. "Analysis of gas network storage capacity for alternative fuels in Poland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 343-353.
    13. Christina Ingo & Jessica Tuuf & Margareta Björklund-Sänkiaho, 2022. "Impact of Hydrogen on Natural Gas Compositions to Meet Engine Gas Quality Requirements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-13, October.
    14. Saedi, Isam & Mhanna, Sleiman & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2021. "Integrated electricity and gas system modelling with hydrogen injections and gas composition tracking," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    15. Danieli, Piero & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Al-Zaili, Jafar & Sayma, Abdulnaser & Masi, Massimo & Carraro, Gianluca, 2022. "The potential of the natural gas grid to accommodate hydrogen as an energy vector in transition towards a fully renewable energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    16. Besagni, Giorgio & Premoli Vilà, Lidia & Borgarello, Marco & Trabucchi, Andrea & Merlo, Marco & Rodeschini, Jacopo & Finazzi, Francesco, 2021. "Electrification pathways of the Italian residential sector under socio-demographic constrains: Looking towards 2040," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    17. Chunyi Wang & Fengzhang Luo & Zheng Jiao & Xiaolei Zhang & Zhipeng Lu & Yanshuo Wang & Ren Zhao & Yang Yang, 2022. "An Enhanced Second-Order Cone Programming-Based Evaluation Method on Maximum Hosting Capacity of Solar Energy in Distribution Systems with Integrated Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Beatrice Castellani & Alberto Maria Gambelli & Elena Morini & Benedetto Nastasi & Andrea Presciutti & Mirko Filipponi & Andrea Nicolini & Federico Rossi, 2017. "Experimental Investigation on CO 2 Methanation Process for Solar Energy Storage Compared to CO 2 -Based Methanol Synthesis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Al-Qahtani, Amjad & Parkinson, Brett & Hellgardt, Klaus & Shah, Nilay & Guillen-Gosalbez, Gonzalo, 2021. "Uncovering the true cost of hydrogen production routes using life cycle monetisation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    20. Vadim Fetisov & Aleksey V. Shalygin & Svetlana A. Modestova & Vladimir K. Tyan & Changjin Shao, 2022. "Development of a Numerical Method for Calculating a Gas Supply System during a Period of Change in Thermal Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:259:y:2020:i:c:s0306261919318033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.