IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v229y2018icp1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transition of a South African sugar mill towards a biorefinery. A feasibility assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Pachón, Elia Ruiz
  • Vaskan, Pavel
  • Raman, Jegannathan Kenthorai
  • Gnansounou, Edgard

Abstract

The survival of the sugar industry in South Africa is under threat due to an unstable and low sugar price, high production cost and old infrastructure. At present, coal and sugarcane bagasse are used as fuels in an inefficient boiler to generate the heat and electricity required by the plant. Moreover, the residues produced during the sugarcane agriculture stage are burnt in the field causing serious concerns in the nearby rural areas. The progress in the conversion of lignocellulosic residues to valuable chemicals in the South African sugar mills would bring benefits in sustainability and both rural and industrial economic development. Sugarcane bagasse and green harvesting residues are the largest lignocellulosic wastes in the production of sugar from sugar cane. They are seen as promising feedstock to improve the long-term sustainability of the local sugar mill. Integrated biorefinery-sugar mill scenarios using sugarcane harvesting residues, bagasse and molasses as feedstock to co-produce chemicals and electricity are evaluated in this work for the first time. The integration of plants was designed in a way to provide both economic and environmental benefits. The following lignocellulose biorefineries were simulated in Aspen Plus V8.8: (SM LE) Co-production of sugar and lactic acid, and (SM LF) co-production of sugar, lactic acid, and furfural. Surplus power was produced in both scenarios for export. Both scenarios were simulated based on literature and experiment data presented in this work. Experiments were conducted on the bagasse pretreatment using dilute acid, and the conversion of hemicellulose into furfural product. The results of techno-economic assessment showed that both scenarios are economically feasible under the considered conditions and provide strong economic benefits in comparison with an existing sugar mill. Among the biorefinery scenarios, the SM LF scenario has better economic performance than SM LE. In terms of environmental assessment, both scenarios demonstrate a significant reduction in climate change, fossil fuel depletion, freshwater ecotoxicity and eutrophication and human toxicity impacts in the South African context. In a nutshell, biorefineries demonstrate potential to be a feasible and more sustainable alternative to the existing sugar mills in the South African context.

Suggested Citation

  • Pachón, Elia Ruiz & Vaskan, Pavel & Raman, Jegannathan Kenthorai & Gnansounou, Edgard, 2018. "Transition of a South African sugar mill towards a biorefinery. A feasibility assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:229:y:2018:i:c:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918311413
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ebrahim, Mubarak & Kawari, Al-, 2000. "Pinch technology: an efficient tool for chemical-plant energy and capital-cost saving," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 65(1-4), pages 45-49, April.
    2. Galdos, Marcelo & Cavalett, Otávio & Seabra, Joaquim E.A. & Nogueira, Luiz Augusto Horta & Bonomi, Antonio, 2013. "Trends in global warming and human health impacts related to Brazilian sugarcane ethanol production considering black carbon emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 576-582.
    3. Gnansounou, Edgard & Kenthorai Raman, Jegannathan, 2016. "Life cycle assessment of algae biodiesel and its co-products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 300-308.
    4. Vaskan, Pavel & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo & Jiménez, Laureano, 2012. "Multi-objective design of heat-exchanger networks considering several life cycle impacts using a rigorous MILP-based dimensionality reduction technique," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 149-161.
    5. Haro, Pedro & Aracil, Cristina & Vidal-Barrero, Fernando & Ollero, Pedro, 2015. "Balance and saving of GHG emissions in thermochemical biorefineries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 444-455.
    6. He, Jie & Zhang, Wennan, 2011. "Techno-economic evaluation of thermo-chemical biomass-to-ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1224-1232, April.
    7. Dias, Marina O.S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Cavalett, Otávio & Pavanello, Lucas G. & Cunha, Marcelo P. & Jesus, Charles D.F. & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Bonomi, Antonio, 2013. "Biorefineries for the production of first and second generation ethanol and electricity from sugarcane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 72-78.
    8. Nguyen, Thu Lan T. & Gheewala, Shabbir H. & Garivait, Savitri, 2008. "Full chain energy analysis of fuel ethanol from cane molasses in Thailand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 85(8), pages 722-734, August.
    9. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Ye, Song-Ching & Sheen, Herng-Kuang, 2012. "Hydrolysis characteristics of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by dilute acid solution in a microwave irradiation environment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 237-244.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hiloidhari, Moonmoon & Vijay, Vandit & Banerjee, Rangan & Baruah, D.C. & Rao, Anand B., 2021. "Energy-carbon-water footprint of sugarcane bioenergy: A district-level life cycle assessment in the state of Maharashtra, India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. I.Fazrakhmanov & M. Lukyanova & V. Kovshov & A. Farrakhetdinova & J. Putyatinskaya, 2018. "Economic Assessment and Strategic Potential of Agro Industries: The Case of Sugar Industry," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 239-254.
    3. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Chunilall, Viren & Msele, Kwanele & Buthelezi, Lindiswa & Johakimu, Jonas & Andrew, Jerome & Zungu, Manqoba & Moloantoa, Karabelo & Maningi, Nontuthuko & Habimana, Olivier & Swart, 2023. "Biowaste biorefineries in South Africa: Current status, opportunities, and research and development needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Furtado Júnior, Juarez Corrêa & Palacio, José Carlos Escobar & Leme, Rafael Coradi & Lora, Electo Eduardo Silva & da Costa, José Eduardo Loureiro & Reyes, Arnaldo Martín Martínez & del Olmo, Oscar Alm, 2020. "Biorefineries productive alternatives optimization in the brazilian sugar and alcohol industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    5. repec:ers:journl:v:volumexxi:y:2018:i:issue4:p:239-254 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moraes, Bruna S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Pavanello, Lucas G. & Cavalett, Otávio & Mantelatto, Paulo E. & Bonomi, Antonio & Zaiat, Marcelo, 2014. "Anaerobic digestion of vinasse from sugarcane biorefineries in Brazil from energy, environmental, and economic perspectives: Profit or expense?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 825-835.
    2. Botshekan, Maryam & Moheb, Ahmad & Vatankhah, Fatemeh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Shafiei, Marzieh, 2022. "Energy saving alternatives for renewable ethanol production with the focus on separation/purification units: A techno-economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    3. Peng, Huadong & Chen, Hongzhang & Qu, Yongshui & Li, Hongqiang & Xu, Jian, 2014. "Bioconversion of different sizes of microcrystalline cellulose pretreated by microwave irradiation with/without NaOH," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 142-148.
    4. Zhu, Shengdong & Huang, Wenjing & Huang, Wangxiang & Wang, Ke & Chen, Qiming & Wu, Yuanxin, 2015. "Pretreatment of rice straw for ethanol production by a two-step process using dilute sulfuric acid and sulfomethylation reagent," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 190-196.
    5. Dias, Marina O.S. & Junqueira, Tassia L. & Cavalett, Otávio & Pavanello, Lucas G. & Cunha, Marcelo P. & Jesus, Charles D.F. & Maciel Filho, Rubens & Bonomi, Antonio, 2013. "Biorefineries for the production of first and second generation ethanol and electricity from sugarcane," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 72-78.
    6. Lopes, Verônica dos Santos & Fischer, Janaína & Pinheiro, Tais Magalhães Abrantes & Cabral, Bruna Vieira & Cardoso, Vicelma Luiz & Coutinho Filho, Ubirajara, 2017. "Biosurfactant and ethanol co-production using Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Saccharomyces cerevisiae co-cultures and exploded sugarcane bagasse," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 305-310.
    7. Danilo Arcentales-Bastidas & Carla Silva & Angel D. Ramirez, 2022. "The Environmental Profile of Ethanol Derived from Sugarcane in Ecuador: A Life Cycle Assessment Including the Effect of Cogeneration of Electricity in a Sugar Industrial Complex," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    8. Sánchez-Bayo, Alejandra & López-Chicharro, Daniel & Morales, Victoria & Espada, Juan José & Puyol, Daniel & Martínez, Fernando & Astals, Sergi & Vicente, Gemma & Bautista, Luis Fernando & Rodríguez, R, 2020. "Biodiesel and biogas production from Isochrysis galbana using dry and wet lipid extraction: A biorefinery approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 188-195.
    9. Li, Nianqi & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Sunden, Bengt & Wu, Zan & Wang, Qiuwang & Zeng, Min, 2022. "Heat exchanger network synthesis considering detailed thermal-hydraulic performance: Methods and perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    10. Caspeta, Luis & Caro-Bermúdez, Mario A. & Ponce-Noyola, Teresa & Martinez, Alfredo, 2014. "Enzymatic hydrolysis at high-solids loadings for the conversion of agave bagasse to fuel ethanol," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 277-286.
    11. András Éles & László Halász & István Heckl & Heriberto Cabezas, 2019. "Evaluation of the Energy Supply Options of a Manufacturing Plant by the Application of the P-Graph Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    12. Ma, Jiaze & Chang, Chenglin & Wang, Yufei & Feng, Xiao, 2018. "Multi-objective optimization of multi-period interplant heat integration using steam system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 950-960.
    13. Noel, Michael D. & Roach, Travis, 2017. "Marginal reductions in vehicle emissions under a dual-blend ethanol mandate: Evidence from a natural experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 45-54.
    14. Wennan Zhang & Jie He & Per Engstrand & Olof Björkqvist, 2015. "Economic Evaluation on Bio-Synthetic Natural Gas Production Integrated in a Thermomechanical Pulp Mill," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Arcigni, Francesco & Friso, Riccardo & Collu, Maurizio & Venturini, Mauro, 2019. "Harmonized and systematic assessment of microalgae energy potential for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 614-624.
    16. van der Heijden, Harro & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J., 2012. "Exergy analysis of thermochemical ethanol production via biomass gasification and catalytic synthesis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 200-210.
    17. Pranav Nakhate & Yvonne van der Meer, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Seaweed Functionality: A Sustainable Bio-Based Material," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Rendon-Sagardi, Miguel A. & Sanchez-Ramirez, Cuauhtemoc & Cortes-Robles, Guillermo & Alor-Hernandez, Giner & Cedillo-Campos, Miguel G., 2014. "Dynamic analysis of feasibility in ethanol supply chain for biofuel production in Mexico," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 358-367.
    19. Behera, Shuvashish & Kar, Shaktimay & Mohanty, Rama Chandra & Ray, Ramesh Chandra, 2010. "Comparative study of bio-ethanol production from mahula (Madhuca latifolia L.) flowers by Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells immobilized in agar agar and Ca-alginate matrices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 96-100, January.
    20. Pan, Ming & Bulatov, Igor & Smith, Robin, 2016. "Improving heat recovery in retrofitting heat exchanger networks with heat transfer intensification, pressure drop constraint and fouling mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 611-626.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:229:y:2018:i:c:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.