IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v108y2013icp194-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An evaluation of different bioreactor configurations for continuous bio-ethanol production

Author

Listed:
  • Ntihuga, Jean Nepomuscene
  • Senn, Thomas
  • Gschwind, Peter
  • Kohlus, Reinhard

Abstract

In this preliminary investigation, a so-called Blenke cascade and plate heat exchanger bioreactor configuration were compared in terms of mixing characteristics, contamination free process, operational power costs and overall performance. At room temperature, fermentation was initially started as batch run and switched to continuous operation, when the residual sugars within the reactor were detected to be C⩽1% (g/L). Samples from both configurations were taken and analyzed for ethanol and residual sugar content, as well as for any infection of the fermentation and lactic acid content, respectively. Mixing characteristics were studied by the residence time distribution method. Both geometries behaved as a finite number n of continuous stirred tanks in series, behaving as a plug flow with superimposed axial dispersion. The number of tanks in series n obtained in the plate heat exchanger configuration was 1.5–3 times larger than those in the Blenke cascade. The average ethanol productivity was Qp=3.07 (g/Lh) and Qp=2.31 (g/Lh) for cascade and plate exchanger configuration, respectively. The analysis of operational power costs indicates relevant differences between the two reactors at laboratory scale; however, systems with different types of pumps and viscosities are compared. From an industrial scale point of view, specific operational costs decrease with scale-up, as no mechanical mixing is needed in the fermenters.

Suggested Citation

  • Ntihuga, Jean Nepomuscene & Senn, Thomas & Gschwind, Peter & Kohlus, Reinhard, 2013. "An evaluation of different bioreactor configurations for continuous bio-ethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 194-201.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:108:y:2013:i:c:p:194-201
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261913002031
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Behera, Shuvashish & Mohanty, Rama Chandra & Ray, Ramesh Chandra, 2010. "Comparative study of bio-ethanol production from mahula (Madhuca latifolia L.) flowers by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Zymomonas mobilis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2352-2355, July.
    2. Wirawan, Ferdian & Cheng, Chieh-Lun & Kao, Wei-Chen & Lee, Duu-Jong & Chang, Jo-Shu, 2012. "Cellulosic ethanol production performance with SSF and SHF processes using immobilized Zymomonas mobilis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 19-26.
    3. Behera, Shuvashish & Kar, Shaktimay & Mohanty, Rama Chandra & Ray, Ramesh Chandra, 2010. "Comparative study of bio-ethanol production from mahula (Madhuca latifolia L.) flowers by Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells immobilized in agar agar and Ca-alginate matrices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 96-100, January.
    4. Li, Shizhong & Li, Guangming & Zhang, Lei & Zhou, Zhixing & Han, Bing & Hou, Wenhui & Wang, Jingbing & Li, Tiancheng, 2013. "A demonstration study of ethanol production from sweet sorghum stems with advanced solid state fermentation technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 260-265.
    5. Dias, M.O.S. & Junqueira, T.L. & Jesus, C.D.F. & Rossell, C.E.V. & Maciel Filho, R. & Bonomi, A., 2012. "Improving bioethanol production – Comparison between extractive and low temperature fermentation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 548-555.
    6. Americano da Costa, Marcus V. & Pasamontes, Manuel & Normey-Rico, Julio E. & Guzmán, José L. & Berenguel, Manuel, 2013. "Viability and application of ethanol production coupled with solar cooling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 501-509.
    7. Rattanapan, Anuchit & Limtong, Savitree & Phisalaphong, Muenduen, 2011. "Ethanol production by repeated batch and continuous fermentations of blackstrap molasses using immobilized yeast cells on thin-shell silk cocoons," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4400-4404.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dodić, Jelena M. & Vučurović, Damjan G. & Dodić, Siniša N. & Grahovac, Jovana A. & Popov, Stevan D. & Nedeljković, Nataša M., 2012. "Kinetic modelling of batch ethanol production from sugar beet raw juice," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 192-197.
    2. Wirawan, Ferdian & Cheng, Chieh-Lun & Lo, Yung-Chung & Chen, Chun-Yen & Chang, Jo-Shu & Leu, Shao-Yuan & Lee, Duu-Jong, 2020. "Continuous cellulosic bioethanol co-fermentation by immobilized Zymomonas mobilis and suspended Pichia stipitis in a two-stage process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    3. Karagoz, Pınar & Bill, Roslyn M. & Ozkan, Melek, 2019. "Lignocellulosic ethanol production: Evaluation of new approaches, cell immobilization and reactor configurations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 741-752.
    4. Kyriakou, Maria & Chatziiona, Vasiliki K. & Costa, Costas N. & Kallis, Michalis & Koutsokeras, Loukas & Constantinides, Georgios & Koutinas, Michalis, 2019. "Biowaste-based biochar: A new strategy for fermentative bioethanol overproduction via whole-cell immobilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 480-491.
    5. Wirawan, Ferdian & Cheng, Chieh-Lun & Kao, Wei-Chen & Lee, Duu-Jong & Chang, Jo-Shu, 2012. "Cellulosic ethanol production performance with SSF and SHF processes using immobilized Zymomonas mobilis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 19-26.
    6. Tripti Agrawal & Afaque Quraishi & Shailesh Kumar Jadhav, 2019. "Bioethanol production from Madhuca latifolia L. flowers by a newly isolated strain of Pichia kudriavzevii," Energy & Environment, , vol. 30(8), pages 1477-1490, December.
    7. Behera, Shuvashish & Arora, Richa & Nandhagopal, N. & Kumar, Sachin, 2014. "Importance of chemical pretreatment for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 91-106.
    8. Mishra, Abhishek & Sharma, Ajay K. & Sharma, Sumit & Bagai, Rashmi & Mathur, Anshu S. & Gupta, Ravi P. & Tuli, Deepak K., 2016. "Lignocellulosic ethanol production employing immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae in packed bed reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 57-63.
    9. Zabed, H. & Sahu, J.N. & Suely, A. & Boyce, A.N. & Faruq, G., 2017. "Bioethanol production from renewable sources: Current perspectives and technological progress," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 475-501.
    10. Rattanapan, Anuchit & Limtong, Savitree & Phisalaphong, Muenduen, 2011. "Ethanol production by repeated batch and continuous fermentations of blackstrap molasses using immobilized yeast cells on thin-shell silk cocoons," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 4400-4404.
    11. Lou, Rui & Wu, Shu-bin, 2011. "Products properties from fast pyrolysis of enzymatic/mild acidolysis lignin," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 316-322, January.
    12. Leon, Juan A. & Palacios-Bereche, Reynaldo & Nebra, Silvia A., 2016. "Batch pervaporative fermentation with coupled membrane and its influence on energy consumption in permeate recovery and distillation stage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 77-91.
    13. Schneider, Willian Daniel Hahn & Fontana, Roselei Claudete & Baudel, Henrique Macedo & de Siqueira, Félix Gonçalves & Rencoret, Jorge & Gutiérrez, Ana & de Eugenio, Laura Isabel & Prieto, Alicia & Mar, 2020. "Lignin degradation and detoxification of eucalyptus wastes by on-site manufacturing fungal enzymes to enhance second-generation ethanol yield," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    14. Singh, Shuchi & Khanna, Swati & Moholkar, Vijayanand S. & Goyal, Arun, 2014. "Screening and optimization of pretreatments for Parthenium hysterophorus as feedstock for alcoholic biofuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 195-206.
    15. Wang, Pixiang & Chen, Yong Mei & Wang, Yifen & Lee, Yoon Y. & Zong, Wenming & Taylor, Steven & McDonald, Timothy & Wang, Yi, 2019. "Towards comprehensive lignocellulosic biomass utilization for bioenergy production: Efficient biobutanol production from acetic acid pretreated switchgrass with Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum ," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 551-559.
    16. Chen, Wei-Cheng & Sheng, Chung-Teh & Liu, Yu-Cheng & Chen, Wei-Jen & Huang, Wen-Luh & Chang, Shih-Hsien & Chang, Wei-Che, 2014. "Optimizing the efficiency of anhydrous ethanol purification via regenerable molecular sieve," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 483-489.
    17. Kim, Jieun & Kim, Ki-Hyun & Kwon, Eilhann E., 2016. "Enhanced thermal cracking of VOCs evolved from the thermal degradation of lignin using CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 51-57.
    18. Gianluca Cavalaglio & Mattia Gelosia & Silvia D’Antonio & Andrea Nicolini & Anna Laura Pisello & Marco Barbanera & Franco Cotana, 2016. "Lignocellulosic Ethanol Production from the Recovery of Stranded Driftwood Residues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-10, August.
    19. Hongshen Li & Hongrui Liu & Yufang Li & Jilin Nan & Chen Shi & Shizhong Li, 2021. "Combined Vapor Permeation and Continuous Solid-State Distillation for Energy-Efficient Bioethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Singh, Anita & Sharma, Punita & Saran, Alok Kumar & Singh, Namita & Bishnoi, Narsi R., 2013. "Comparative study on ethanol production from pretreated sugarcane bagasse using immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae on various matrices," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 488-493.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:108:y:2013:i:c:p:194-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.